Instead, the ridiculous prosecution "suggested" three " possible crimes" , that the judge said they do not have to agree on to convict..
OUTRAGEOUS PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT.
OUTRAGEOUS PROSECUTORIAL AND JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT.
Isn't that up to the jury to decide?
Bragg Prosecution Still Fails to Show and Prove the "Underlying Crime"
It is a fact.Isn't that up to the jury to decide?
That it's up to the jury to decide.It is a fact.
...
To convict Trump, Merchan told the jury they will have to find unanimously — that is, all 12 jurors must agree — that the former president created a fraudulent entry in his company’s records or caused someone else to do so, and that he did so with the intent of committing or concealing another crime.
What’s being distorted by some online is the judge’s instruction about how to reach a verdict about that second element.
Prosecutors say the crime Trump committed or hid is a violation of a New York election law making it illegal for two or more conspirators “to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means.”
Merchan gave the jurors three possible “unlawful means”: falsifying other business records, breaking the Federal Election Campaign Act or submitting false information on a tax return.
For a conviction, each juror would have to find that at least one of those three things happened, but they don’t have to agree unanimously which it was....
.
cite
To MAGA, nah, to them, Trump is incapable of breaking any law, any jury to say otherwise hates Trump and is prejudicial against himIsn't that up to the jury to decide?
isn't it up to a prosecutor to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.......or, at the very least to indict?.......this crap pile didn't do either......Isn't that up to the jury to decide?
sorry, but you overlook the part where it is required by the 6th amendment.....I'll keep repeating because you Magats are stupid that it is NOT required by NYS law.
I can repeat how Trespass, a misdemeanor, becomes Felony Trespass if you need that example repeated.
The Sixth Amendment guarantees the rights of criminal defendants, including the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the right to a lawyer, the right to an impartial jury, and the right to know who your accusers are and the nature of the charges and evidence against you.
6th Amendment:I'll keep repeating because you Magats are stupid that it is NOT required by NYS law.
I can repeat how Trespass, a misdemeanor, becomes Felony Trespass if you need that example repeated.
This is 2024....and NY.I'm sure the jury will be polled no matter what they decide. Any hesitation from any one of them is grounds for a mistrial.
Yep. It's a clown show in an attempt to subvert a free and fair election by removing a candidate chosen by the people.This is 2024....and NY.
Its abuse...and we are the victims.Yep. It's a clown show in an attempt to subvert a free and fair election by removing a candidate chosen by the people.
6th Amendment:
For the jury's composition, the Sixth Amendment grants citizens the right to a jury composed of impartial members drawn from the local community. Convictions in these trials are also forbidden unless every element of the crime has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt by the same impartial jury.sorry, but you overlook the part where it is required by the 6th amendment.....
I'm sorry, but you DO realize how totally irrelevant your comment is, right.....the 6th amendment requires the prosecutor to notify the defendant he is on trial for felony trespass and to prove the charge beyond a reasonable doubt as well.....And yet laws like Felony Trespass have existed for decades with the underlying crime (was he there to kidnap, murder, rob, etc) never needing to be proven or even isolated to one offense.
I know, I know, you two are so stupid you say 'we can see what you are saying and KNOW historically that is true, but we still disagree'.
You disagree because you are stupid.
Are you back commenting on law despite your history of NEVER getting it right? Really?I'm sorry, but you DO realize how totally irrelevant your comment is, right.....the 6th amendment requires the prosecutor to notify the defendant he is on trial for felony trespass and to prove the charge beyond a reasonable doubt as well.....
shucks, when you pump gas your boss requires you to tell the customer whether you're charging him for regular or premium doesn't he.......
...
To convict Trump, Merchan told the jury they will have to find unanimously — that is, all 12 jurors must agree — that the former president created a fraudulent entry in his company’s records or caused someone else to do so, and that he did so with the intent of committing or concealing another crime.
What’s being distorted by some online is the judge’s instruction about how to reach a verdict about that second element.
Prosecutors say the crime Trump committed or hid is a violation of a New York election law making it illegal for two or more conspirators “to promote or prevent the election of any person to a public office by unlawful means.”
Merchan gave the jurors three possible “unlawful means”: falsifying other business records, breaking the Federal Election Campaign Act or submitting false information on a tax return.
For a conviction, each juror would have to find that at least one of those three things happened, but they don’t have to agree unanimously which it was....
.
cite
lol....gas station clerks posing as armchair lawyers should switch to premium fuel........the prosecutor IS required to charge lesser included offenses and to prove them beyond a reasonable doubt......it is required by the US constitution......Are you back commenting on law despite your history of NEVER getting it right? Really?
The 6th Amendment requires they identify the TOP crime of Felony Trespass, BUT NOT, the underlying crimes that allowed misdemeanor Trespass be escalated to a felony.