blah blah blah
Side note... the initial vote just failed to pass this bill in the house.
nice.
blah blah blah
Side note... the initial vote just failed to pass this bill in the house.
Assmunch continues to ignore the problem in his line of 'thinking' (by the way... you just agreed with asshat... that should tell you something).... the Treasury has the TIME and RESOURCES to unwind this debt. Most private firms do not. Those that do... will participate in the auctions.
Just because the ability to make money exists doesn't mean it isn't without great risk. That risk is reduced by the Treasury holding it because they have the TIME to ride it out should they need to. Very few investors are going to wait 10-20 years for this to payoff.
Side note... the initial vote just failed to pass this bill in the house.
Yes, in a perfect - but impossible - Libertarian world we could always say that people will behave rationally. That's not human nature.
The fact that you can even conceptualize rational behavior proves that it is well within human nature. We would not be at the top of the food chain if not for our rational capacity.
Right it had nothing to do with the fact that they were irresponsibly giving away mortgages.
It must be the fact that we require them to accurately value and report their assets.
Human beings don't always act rationally. It is a mistake in economic equations and Austrian pseodo-scientific oral arguments to assume a rational actor.
LOL at "oral arguments", you can always tell when someone is trying to sound smart.Human beings don't always act rationally. It is a mistake in economic equations and Austrian pseodo-scientific oral arguments to assume a rational actor.
They are not being accurately valued.
LOL at "oral arguments", you can always tell when someone is trying to sound smart.
They don't act "rationally" as defined by water. It might not even seem "rational" to most people. But that is due to forcing some external value judgment upon them.
LOL at "oral arguments", you can always tell when someone is trying to sound smart.
Had you actually bothered to read any Hayek or Von Mises, you'll know that they do not assume people always act rationally, they do warn about government taking responsibility for people and where it can lead:
"once government has embarked upon planning for the sake of justice, it cannot refuse responsibility for anybody's fate or position" - Hayek
Are human beings going to act MORE rationally and responsible by this bailout plan with government taking responsibility for them? You are only going to make it worse going down this road.
And leaving assets artifically high is a a better approach?
Unwind? YOu keep saying unwind like it means something in relation to eliminating debt. It's not bubble tape, you shithead.Treasury has the TIME and RESOURCES to unwind this debt. .
RS, you simple have to accept the fact that if everyone act in their own best interest the best mutual result will not always happen.
This can be proved mathematically, with the "liberal paradox". There are many situations in which if everyone acts in their own best interest a mutually destructive situation will occur.
There was one sole cause of the current crisis and that was deregulation.
It's rich white people selectively "helping".Political pressure to give loans to people who couldn't afford them was another cause. Affimative Action is similar to that kind of thinking. It's not brown people's fault; it's the fault of PC idiocy.
It's rich white people selectively "helping".
More rich white people. It's always their fault.do not forget the mortgage people that schemed and lied to get people loans that they did not understand and could not pay
So? That makes it irrational?
You cannot determine the best mutual result without a means to establish the self interest of the individuals. Without free market prices your goal of achieving the best mutual result is not even possible.