Capitalism Is EVIL!

zymurgy said:
why would they be in a court of law if they agree?

and if they do not agree, why are you still calling it a contract? you said a contract required agreement

this is your circular logic at play. it makes me laugh fallacy boy
Click to expand...
Contextomy fallacy. Maintain consistent tense.
Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame your fallacies on me or anybody else.
 
Into the Night said:
Contextomy fallacy. Maintain consistent tense.
Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame your fallacies on me or anybody else.
Click to expand...
and there he goes. presented wit his own conflicting words, fallacy boy derps out

again - if they agree, they would not be in court, and if they don't agree - you said it isn't a contract. so which is it?

must be nice taking both sides of a debate to protect your obvious insecurities
 
zymurgy said:
and there he goes. presented wit his own conflicting words, fallacy boy derps out

again - if they agree, they would not be in court, and if they don't agree - you said it isn't a contract. so which is it?

must be nice taking both sides of a debate to protect your obvious insecurities
Click to expand...
Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame your fallacies on me or anybody else, dipshit.
Contextomy fallacy. Maintain consistent tense.
Fallacy fallacy. False authority fallacy. Debates do not define words. There is no debate here. Only conversations. Apparently you don't know what 'debate' means either.
 
Into the Night said:
You don't get to speak for everyone. Omniscience fallacy.
Verbal contracts can be legally enforced. Contracts need not even be written.
Click to expand...
one of the defintions does explicitly mean written and more likely to be legally enforce.

are you trying to downplay the importance of legal protection for the common man?

I think you are.
 
Blackwater Lunchbreak said:
one of the defintions does explicitly mean written and more likely to be legally enforce.

are you trying to downplay the importance of legal protection for the common man?

I think you are.
Click to expand...
False authority fallacy. Fixation. Repetition fallacy (chanting). Non-sequitur fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Elitism. Redefinition fallacy.

Who are YOU to claim an elite? Verbal contracts can be legally enforced.
You do not get to redefine words. Stop playing word games.
 
Into the Night said:
False authority fallacy. Fixation. Repetition fallacy (chanting). Non-sequitur fallacy. Buzzword fallacy. Argument of the Stone fallacy. Elitism. Redefinition fallacy.

Who are YOU to claim an elite? Verbal contracts can be legally enforced.
You do not get to redefine words. Stop playing word games.
Click to expand...

blah blah. words mean things dipshit.

ok verbal contracts can be legally enforced.

you used verbal contracts when specifying verbal contracts. good for you.

perfectly fine usage.
 
Into the Night said:
Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame your fallacies on me or anybody else, dipshit.
Contextomy fallacy. Maintain consistent tense.
Fallacy fallacy. False authority fallacy. Debates do not define words. There is no debate here. Only conversations. Apparently you don't know what 'debate' means either.
Click to expand...
I am quoting you directly dipshit

if they agree, why are they in court? start with that one. you said it - now explain it
 
Yakuda said:
Same thing. Two parties voluntarily entering to an agreement to trade goods and services. Cry if you must but that's what all contracts essentially are whether formal or informal.
Click to expand...
All trees are plants, but not all plants are trees. Except you want to call all plants trees as well.

All contracts are agreements, but not all agreements are contracts. Except that you want to call all agreements contracts as well.

Question: Why does contract law exist? After all, people don't need lawyers to reach agreements.
 
IBDaMann said:
All trees are plants, but not all plants are trees. Except you want to call all plants trees as well.

All contracts are agreements, but not all agreements are contracts. Except that you want to call all agreements contracts as well.

Question: Why does contract law exist? After all, people don't need lawyers to reach agreements.
Click to expand...
All agreements over time are contracts.
Redefinition fallacy.
 
Into the Night said:
All agreements over time are contracts. Redefinition fallacy.
Click to expand...
I'll acknowledge that you and I are using different defintions, but mine is the standard that you are redefining.

We could do the same thing with "speed limit." I'll refer to what's posted. If you want to use the term to mean the upper limit reachable by your vehicle, then great, but you would be the one using your own cusomt definition.

Officially, I don't think there's anything wrong with you using your definition of "contract" as long as you specify that that is what you mean. However, you err if you tell others that they are wrong for referring to only those agreeements that meet the requirements for being contracts as being contracts.
 
IBDaMann said:
I'll acknowledge that you and I are using different defintions, but mine is the standard that you are redefining.
Click to expand...
Redefinition fallacy. You cannot change the definition of 'contract' that way!
IBDaMann said:
We could do the same thing with "speed limit." I'll refer to what's posted. If you want to use the term to mean the upper limit reachable by your vehicle, then great, but you would be the one using your own cusomt definition.
Click to expand...
False equivalence fallacy.
IBDaMann said:
Officially, I don't think there's anything wrong with you using your definition of "contract" as long as you specify that that is what you mean. However, you err if you tell others that they are wrong for referring to only those agreeements that meet the requirements for being contracts as being contracts.
Click to expand...
Verbal agreements are contracts. It IS within the definition of a contract. I am not defining any word here. YOU are. Redefinition fallacy. Inversion fallacy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top