Conspiracy Theories Debunked

christiefan915 said:
[SUB][FONT=&](As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.[/FONT] )[/SUB]

Next sentence:

"Despite this promise [these dummies mean premise], the antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven in vivo. While ivermectin's activity against SARS-CoV-2 is currently under investigation in patients, insufficient emphasis has been placed on formulation challenges."
Click to expand...

but the first sentence is also there.

and your big sentence is full of weasel words. not consistently proven, but inconsistently proven?

this is why you people are losing.

you're compulsive gaslighters, resistant to all truth, apparently.
 
Blackwater Lunchbreak said:
but the first sentence is also there.

and your big sentence is full of weasel words. not consistently proven, but inconsistently proven?

this is why you people are losing.

you're compulsive gaslighters, resistant to all truth, apparently.
Click to expand...

My "big sentence" contains the actual words written by the six scientists named in the paper. You're criticizing the wrong person here.

Abstract

Ivermectin is an FDA-approved broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent with demonstrated antiviral activity against a number of DNA and RNA viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Despite this promise, the antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven in vivo. While ivermectin's activity against SARS-CoV-2 is currently under investigation in patients, insufficient emphasis has been placed on formulation challenges. Here, we discuss challenges surrounding the use of ivermectin in the context of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and how novel formulations employing micro- and nanotechnologies may address these concerns.
 
christiefan915 said:
Yet you had the 2nd largest number of covid deaths after the US. How did that happen when ivermectin was so freely and cheaply available?

US deaths 1,219,487

Brazil deaths 711,380

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries
Click to expand...

Absolutely..... it is because the Brazilian people enmass DID NOT use Ivermectin. It was likewise demonized here.

The government of Brazil made a devil's deal with Pfizer. However they did have other vaccines as well.

Brazilians are very familiar with the use of Ivermectin for the elimination of parasites but the government and the media propaganda did not condone the use for Covid-19.


VACCINES THAT WERE USED IN BRAZIL DURING THE PLANDEMIC

AstraZeneca/Oxford vaccine (manufactured by SK Bioscience, South Korea)

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (two bivalent versions against the Omicron BA.1 and BA.4/BA.5 subvariants)

Sinovac vaccine (CoronaVac) ..... made in China

These vaccines were approved and distributed by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (Anvisa).

AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.
Click to expand...
 
christiefan915 said:
Five of the six scientists named are from Brazil, the country that supported ivermectin but also had the second-highest number of covid deaths in the world.
Click to expand...

Show me your data with regard to how much Ivermectin was used in Brazil for treatment of Covid-19.
I traveled here every year during the Plandemic and the VACCINE was KING here.
 
Blackwater Lunchbreak said:
Abstract
Ivermectin is an FDA-approved broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent with demonstrated antiviral activity against a number of DNA and RNA viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539925/
Click to expand...

DemonRats, leftists, progs and Marxists remain Mass Formated and blinded by an unwillingess to embrace new information as it comes out.

Conservative are far more willing to engage in the scientific method of inquiry and investigation.

Conservatives are questioning authority and allowing free speech.

Isn't it interesting how the traditional attitudes in society have reversed in the West ...... once called the Free World.
 
QuaseMarco said:
DemonRats, leftists, progs and Marxists remain Mass Formated and blinded by an unwillingess to embrace new information as it comes out.

Conservative are far more willing to engage in the scientific method of inquiry and investigation.

Conservatives are questioning authority and allowing free speech.

Isn't it interesting how the traditional attitudes in society have reversed in the West ...... once called the Free World.
Click to expand...

very interesting indeed.
 
Blackwater Lunchbreak said:
Abstract
Ivermectin is an FDA-approved broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent with demonstrated antiviral activity against a number of DNA and RNA viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539925/
Click to expand...
It’s easy to see why you stopped reading the rest of the abstract.

Here’s the rest:

Despite this promise, the antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven in vivo. While ivermectin's activity against SARS-CoV-2 is currently under investigation in patients, insufficient emphasis has been placed on formulation challenges. Here, we discuss challenges surrounding the use of ivermectin in the context of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and how novel formulations employing micro- and nanotechnologies may address these concerns.
 
QuaseMarco said:
DemonRats, leftists, progs and Marxists remain Mass Formated and blinded by an unwillingess to embrace new information as it comes out.

Conservative are far more willing to engage in the scientific method of inquiry and investigation.

Conservatives are questioning authority and allowing free speech.

Isn't it interesting how the traditional attitudes in society have reversed in the West ...... once called the Free World.
Click to expand...
Such are doing their medical research on Facebook? Injecting bleach? Accepting that the entire Earth was flooded during Noah’s time?
 
Doc Dutch said:
It’s easy to see why you stopped reading the rest of the abstract.

Here’s the rest:

Despite this promise, the antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven in vivo. While ivermectin's activity against SARS-CoV-2 is currently under investigation in patients, insufficient emphasis has been placed on formulation challenges. Here, we discuss challenges surrounding the use of ivermectin in the context of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) and how novel formulations employing micro- and nanotechnologies may address these concerns.
Click to expand...

but the previous sentence still exists. Ivermectin is a known anti-viral for human use.

and your testamentary sentence contains weasel words.

what does 'inconsistently proven' mean? (ya fucking idiot)

it was added for anti-reality shills like you.
 
Last edited:
Doc Dutch said:
As does the latter part, Tard Thoughts.

You’re free to cherry-pick your facts, but it only makes you look like a Tard.
Click to expand...

what does inconsistently proven mean, dipshit?

it's still proof of some effectiveness.

how much?

nobody knows.

regardless, it's a known human anti-viral of some effectiveness.

that's not what the media said.

they lied and said it was only for horses.

and you're still here saying it like a retarded thought.
:tardthoughts:
 
Blackwater Lunchbreak said:
what does inconsistently proven mean, dipshit?

it's still proof of some effectiveness.

Tard thoughts:
Click to expand...
Not quite, Tard. It means some cases reported effectiveness, but since the reports are inconsistent, there may be other factors in play.

That said, I fully support your right to inject yourself with Ivermectin, shove HCQ suppositories up your ass and drink bleach. :thup:
 
Doc Dutch said:
Not quite, Tard. It means some cases reported effectiveness, but since the reports are inconsistent, there may be other factors in play.
Click to expand...

so some cases reporting effectiveness is not some effectiveness?

see.

you only have idiotic weasel-wording.

you're not smart.

you're a semi-coherent idiot who argues in bad faith for horrible things.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top