Do you think the people involved in mass shootings are going to be pro gun control?

Responding to public opinion, states have loosened gun laws to allow citizens to carry weapons with them almost anywhere they go.


In Georgia, Arizona, Tennessee and Virginia, it's legal to carry a gun into a bar.


Guns and booze: What could go wrong?



But here's the odd thing: At the same time as Americans have become more enthusiastic about gun rights, fewer and fewer Americans actually want to own a gun themselves.



http://edition.cnn.com/2012/07/23/opinion/frum-guns/index.html
 
Actually the voice of the "guns rights" has been politically amplified by the right and money.
Not more people just louder people.

And guns have no rights only people have rights.
 
violent people chose violent solutions.


non violent people are more willing to chose nonviolent solutions
 
There are laws against killing and yet the shooter didn't seem to care about those

The school was a "gun free zone" brought to you by liberals, how did that work out?

Texas lets teachers arm themselves. No school shootings
 
I Love America said:
There are laws against killing and yet the shooter didn't seem to care about those
Click to expand...

So if people break a law, the law shouldn't exist?

I Love America said:
The school was a "gun free zone" brought to you by liberals, how did that work out?
Click to expand...

Cite your evidence that "the school was a "gun free zone" brought to you by liberals".

I Love America said:
Texas lets teachers arm themselves. No school shootings
Click to expand...

Really?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_shootings_in_the_United_States
 
I Love America said:
There are laws against killing and yet the shooter didn't seem to care about those

The school was a "gun free zone" brought to you by liberals, how did that work out?

Texas lets teachers arm themselves. No school shootings
Click to expand...

Yeah arm everybody, let's take the easy way out.

Instead, how about educating people that you don't solve problems with violence?
 
christiefan915 said:
Yeah arm everybody, let's take the easy way out. Instead, how about educating people that you don't solve problems with violence?
Click to expand...

Does the Second Amendment allow the government to force all citizens to carry guns at all times?
 
Hot Young Girls said:
So if people break a law, the law shouldn't exist?



Cite your evidence that "the school was a "gun free zone" brought to you by liberals".



Really?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_shootings_in_the_United_States
Click to expand...

For the sake of argument, let's say everyone was armed in that school.

The gunman come in and begins firing, there is STILL going to be panic and chaos...the only difference is now you've got God knows how many weekend warriors trying to get the guy and instead of one guy firing indiscriminately you've got DOZENS doing the same.

The INSTANT one child/bystander is killed by some Johnny Law wannabe with a gun and out to get the bad guy, your "more guns makes us safer" argument goes right out the window.

When that day happens, REAL gun control can begin taking place.
 
I'm surprised the panty-pissing hoplomaniacs haven't promoted the idea of arming kids in the classroom yet.
 
ZappasGuitar said:
For the sake of argument, let's say everyone was armed in that school.

The gunman come in and begins firing, there is STILL going to be panic and chaos...the only difference is now you've got God knows how many weekend warriors trying to get the guy and instead of one guy firing indiscriminately you've got DOZENS doing the same.

The INSTANT one child/bystander is killed by some Johnny Law wannabe with a gun and out to get the bad guy, your "more guns makes us safer" argument goes right out the window.

When that day happens, REAL gun control can begin taking place.
Click to expand...



So ONE dead child is no different than 20 dead ones to you....one killed by accident saves 10 others and thats not a good thing, huh ?......by extension, if a cop kills an innocent bystander in a shootout with a bad guy threatening to kill 20 unarmed hostages, then cops shouldn't have weapons......
same thing ain't it.....
do you ever actually THINK
 
ZappasGuitar said:
For the sake of argument, let's say everyone was armed in that school.

The gunman come in and begins firing, there is STILL going to be panic and chaos...the only difference is now you've got God knows how many weekend warriors trying to get the guy and instead of one guy firing indiscriminately you've got DOZENS doing the same.

The INSTANT one child/bystander is killed by some Johnny Law wannabe with a gun and out to get the bad guy, your "more guns makes us safer" argument goes right out the window.

When that day happens, REAL gun control can begin taking place.
Click to expand...

And since the vast majority of teachers are liberals they will be less likely to want to carry a gun.
 
christiefan915 said:
No, but you would think so from the way these people interpret it.
Click to expand...

Acts of terror like this, committed by the mentally ill, the users acting on drugs, or just plain psychopathic criminals, etc. are now in control of everyones rights....affecting everyone freedoms....and we're letting them by imposing limits on the law abiding assuming that will stop the others....

Is that good logic.....does it make sense....is that thinking reasonable ?
 
bravo said:
Acts of terror like this, committed by the mentally ill, the users acting on drugs, or just plain psychopathic criminals, etc. are now in control of everyones rights....affecting everyone freedoms....and we're letting them by imposing limits on the law abiding assuming that will stop the others....Is that good logic.....does it make sense....is that thinking reasonable ?
Click to expand...

Gee, if we allow access to killing machines, some "unfortunate incidents" are bound to happen, huh?

No reason to try to reasonably control that access, is there?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top