Do you think the people involved in mass shootings are going to be pro gun control?
- Thread starter Banned
- Start date
cancel2 2022
Canceled
Hold on there, the principal of that kindergarten was reported to have tried to stop the gunman. Was she dumb?
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
I'm sure the conservatives think she was a liberal and deserved to die.
yup, gun rights are more important than the lives of children. It's not even a tough decision honestly.
i didn't say I wouldn't care... I said if I had to choose between one or the other I would choose guns.
Which translates into caring less about children's lives than about guns.
correct.
As if that's different than not caring. LOL
no... you can still care a lot about both. But at the end of the day, gun rights are sacred, right up there next to freedom of speech and the press and the right to assemble.
At the 'end of the day', if your choice results in lost lives, then what was sacrificed permanently was of little value to the chooser. Your hair-splitting regarding 'care' is ludicrous.
apple0154
MEOW
Wasn't it "Ohio" poster that had a note under his avatar saying, "Are you looking at my pint?" :lol:
When you're in the bar watch where you look or BANG!
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
No, that was Charver, a Yorkshireman.
no... you are just coming from the perspective of not giving a shit about guns... so naturally in your mind to put guns above kids would imply that you don't care about kids. But that's just your own failure at self awareness for your position.
P.S. unless you favor banning cars, you prefer to own a car over the 40k people that die every year in the U.S. due to auto accidents. Simple cost benefit analysis. That's 13 9/11's of death each year.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
i like you USC...but this is really a dumb thread
do you really expect someone who is crazy enough to commit mass murder, especially after killing his mom, then driving to the school to specifically kill his mother's students.....to care about rights?
you're trying to draw a distinction and it fails horribly. that you would politicize this tragedy at this low level speaks volumes about you.
do you really expect someone who is crazy enough to commit mass murder, especially after killing his mom, then driving to the school to specifically kill his mother's students.....to care about rights?
you're trying to draw a distinction and it fails horribly. that you would politicize this tragedy at this low level speaks volumes about you.
G
Guns Guns Guns
Guest
Are you claiming that accidental deaths are the same as murders?
I guess you aren't a Christian or think Jesus was dumb...
There are people who put their lives on the line daily for criminals and thugs. People forget about those people, but I don't. I think about them on a daily basis. I am grateful for their service.
the end result is the same. You've made a cost benefit analysis that it's worth 40,000 deaths each year to own a car. Most people make that choice. Society could restructure itself to not commute as far for work, live closer to stores, etc... but that's an inconvenience.. and any way you slice it, we've decided that 40k deaths in auto accidents each year is worth it. You yourself have made that decision, and you are perfectly fine with that. It could probably double, triple, or even be increased 10 fold and you would still be fine with it. You care more about your right to commute and own a car than the 40k people that die each year.
We do this everyday for all things.
I remember the words of a gentle men at the Gabby Gifford shooting, and he said it was chaos and he was armed and he nearly killed an innocent person.
