Does monotheism cause violence? New book says, yes.

BidenPresident

Verified User
Kim is critical of much of traditional Christian theology — and of monotheism in general. He endorses the critique of the so-called “Mosaic distinction” between true and false religion, which was proposed by Jan Assmann. The famous Egyptologist accused biblical narratives concerning Moses of introducing for the first time in history a sharp distinction between true and false religion — or true and false gods. He charged that such a distinction encouraged hostility to the worshipers of gods in other traditions, and alleged that biblical monotheism was uniquely culpable for religious violence.

https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-center-did-not-hold/
 
Kim is critical of much of traditional Christian theology — and of monotheism in general. He endorses the critique of the so-called “Mosaic distinction” between true and false religion, which was proposed by Jan Assmann. The famous Egyptologist accused biblical narratives concerning Moses of introducing for the first time in history a sharp distinction between true and false religion — or true and false gods. He charged that such a distinction encouraged hostility to the worshipers of gods in other traditions, and alleged that biblical monotheism was uniquely culpable for religious violence.

https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-center-did-not-hold/

That's like saying Marx and Engels's "The Communist Manifesto" caused the murder of over 100 million people in the 20th century.

Books don't kill people. People kill people.
 
Kim is critical of much of traditional Christian theology — and of monotheism in general. He endorses the critique of the so-called “Mosaic distinction” between true and false religion, which was proposed by Jan Assmann. The famous Egyptologist accused biblical narratives concerning Moses of introducing for the first time in history a sharp distinction between true and false religion — or true and false gods. He charged that such a distinction encouraged hostility to the worshipers of gods in other traditions, and alleged that biblical monotheism was uniquely culpable for religious violence.

https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-center-did-not-hold/

Does leftianity cause violence? Yes...yes it does.
 
have there been any violent attacks by the Christian community in the last hundred years?..........

only ones I recall are the more passive aggressive damaging of closed for the day abortion clinics.

hardly compares to mohammadans having violence required by their religious texts.
 
was it a religious war or a political war?......
Now you're trying to modify the question you asked

Muslim versus Christian has been a defining condition and historical context of the Balkan peninsula for the last 800 years. This is well known to anyone who is aware of the history of the Byzantine empire and the Ottoman Turks in southeastern Europe.
 
Now you're trying to modify the question you asked

Muslim versus Christian has been a defining condition and historical context of the Balkan peninsula for the last 800 years. This is well known to anyone who is aware of the history of the Byzantine empire and the Ottoman Turks in southeastern Europe.

no.....I am not modifying anything.........was the war in Bosnia about the validity of one doctrine over another or was it about the 800 years of history........
 
Or that a violent riot was a peaceful protest

My favorite is still "normal tourist visit". He's a liar who supported the violence at the Capitol by his attempts to downplay the violence.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/...description-of-normal-tourist-visit-on-jan-6/
GOP Rep. Clyde defends ‘normal tourist visit’ comparison for Jan. 6
GOP Rep. Andrew Clyde (Ga.) defended his description of rioters walking through the Capitol on Jan. 6 appearing to look like a “normal tourist visit” during a committee meeting on Tuesday.

He's running for re-election and favored to win: https://ballotpedia.org/Andrew_Clyde

https://www.270towin.com/2022-house-election/
 
no.....I am not modifying anything.........was the war in Bosnia about the validity of one doctrine over another or was it about the 800 years of history........
This was the precise question you asked:

have there been any violent attacks by the Christian community in the last hundred years?..........

Even Al Qaeda had political goals. They wanted to drive the US out of Saudi Arabia and overthrow the corrupt Arab dictatorships.

You can't conveniently sweep the religious dimension under the carpet in the Balkans wars. War is political by nature, but Christian versus Muslim grievances has been bubbling under the surface for eight centuries

Serbian christians committed mass murderer and genocide on Bosnian Muslims in part because of the underlying religious and historical dimension
 
This was the precise question you asked:



Even Al Qaeda had political goals. They wanted to drive the US out of Saudi Arabia and overthrow the corrupt Arab dictatorships.

You can't conveniently sweep the religious dimension under the carpet in the Balkans wars. War is political by nature, but Christian versus Muslim grievances has been bubbling under the surface for eight centuries

Serbian christians committed mass murderer and genocide on Bosnian Muslims in part because of the underlying religious and historical dimension

do you recall ever hearing anyone on either side of that war using religious doctrine as an argument in favor of the actions they were taking?......ironically, while claiming that religion is the cause for the war in Bosnia you can simultaneously argue that Christianity in Europe has become meaningless as only 22% attend church services once a month or more.......
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2018/05/29/being-christian-in-western-europe/
 
Last edited:
My favorite is still "normal tourist visit". He's a liar who supported the violence at the Capitol by his attempts to downplay the violence.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/...description-of-normal-tourist-visit-on-jan-6/
GOP Rep. Clyde defends ‘normal tourist visit’ comparison for Jan. 6


He's running for re-election and favored to win: https://ballotpedia.org/Andrew_Clyde

https://www.270towin.com/2022-house-election/

you suck at logic and thinking.
 
Back
Top