Due Process Does Look Different: DHS Official Defends Deportation of Maryland Man

I said he was found to be involved with a terrorist gang group.

Feb 21, 2025. Last month, DHS issued a notice expanding the reach of expedited removal to individuals living in the interior of the United States. This would allow certain noncitizens to be deported without an opportunity to gather evidence, contact an attorney, or to present their case to a judge
And the USSC juts basically called that unconstitutional when they said that Garcia has the right to due process.
 
That is not the ruling, but an argument made by plaintiff counsel.

The actual ruling states;

{The application is granted in part and denied in part, subject to the direction of this order. Due to the administrative stay issued by THE CHIEF JUSTICE, the deadline imposed by the District Court has now passed. To that extent, the Government's emergency application is effectively granted in part and the deadline in the challenged order is no longer effective. The rest of the District Court’s order remains in effect but requires clarification on remand. The other properly requires the Government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador. }
OMFG.... How stupid can you possibly be?
The entire document is the ruling. You don't get to parse out some of the court's document and claim the plaintiffs wrote it. A concurring opinion is still part of the court's ruling.

You will find what I quoted in the document put out by the court.

 
Indeed.

Poor Pobre has not been right this decade.
Are you really going to argue that this quote is not from your link to the court's ruling?

It is part of the concurring opinion written by Justice Jackson.

The Government now requests an order from this Court permitting it to leave Abrego Garcia, a husband and father without a criminal record, in a Salvadoran prison for no reason recognized by the law. The only argument the Government offers in support of its request, that United States courts cannot grant relief once a deportee crosses the border, is plainly wrong. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U. S. 426, 447, n. 16 (2004); cf. Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U. S. 723, 732 (2008). The Government’s argument, moreover, implies that it could deport and incarcerate any person, including U. S. citizens, without legal consequence, so long as it does so before a court can intervene.
 
If Homeland Security can show evidence that a person is a member of a gang designated as a terrorist group, they can deport that person.


NOEM v. ABREGO GARCIA | Supreme Court | US Law

View attachment 47792
LII | Legal Information Institute
https://www.law.cornell.edu › U.S. Supreme Court




17 hours ago — ... is currently detained in the Center for Terrorism Confinement (CECOT). ... his returnto the United States would pose a threat to the public.
***“The United States alleges, however, that Abrego Garcia has been found to be a member of the gang MS–13, a designated foreign terrorist organization, and that his return to the United States would pose a threat to the public.”*** (Asterisks are mine)
You almost got the point. They were not given a court hearing requiring evidence of crimes. Most have clean records. If they gave them court time to prove their cases, it would be more acceptable to Dems. But rounding up people and shipping them to a foreign land to be abused and tortured, is as unAmeruican as it gets.
It is obvious that Trump organized this torture before he took office. That is Trumpian and wrong. Who was involved in the deal? How much are we paying? How long did he guarantee providing people to torture?
 
Politics

'Due process does look different': DHS official defends deportation of Maryland man​

NPR
By Luke Garrett
Published April 7, 2025 at 11:03 AM PDT
Supporters hold up signs as Jennifer Vasquez Sura, the wife of Kilmar Abrego Garcia of Maryland, who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, speaks during a news conference at CASA's Multicultural Center in Hyattsville, Md., Friday, April 4.'s Multicultural Center in Hyattsville, Md., Friday, April 4.
Jose Luis Magana
/
AP
Supporters hold up signs as Jennifer Vasquez Sura, the wife of Kilmar Abrego Garcia of Maryland, who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, speaks during a news conference at CASA's Multicultural Center in Hyattsville, Md., Friday, April 4.
The Trump administration has defended its deportation of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia — a Maryland man mistakenly sent to a prison in El Salvador — saying "due process does look different" for people they say are members of gangs the White House has designated as terrorist organizations.

Abrego Garcia was arrested and deported in March, despite having been granted protection by an immigration judge in 2019 that should have prevented him from being deported to El Salvador.

The Justice Department has admitted the deportation was an "administrative error," but DOJ lawyers argued in court papers that he is a member of the criminal gang MS-13.


In an interview with All Things Considered guest host and NPR White House correspondent Asma Khalid on Sunday, Tricia McLaughlin — assistant secretary for public affairs at the Department of Homeland Security — said the Trump administration's deportations are legal.

l Salvador presidential press office
/
via AP
In this photo provided by El Salvador's presidential press office, a prison guard transfers deportees from the U.S., alleged to be Venezuelan gang members, to the Terrorism Confinement Center in Tecoluca, El Salvador, Sunday, March 16.
"In every single case, there is due process," McLaughlin said. But, she added, there are different processes for people deemed members of terrorist groups.

It's interesting to us smarter and less gullible people how you MAGATs suddenly have abandoned the whole idea of "those filthy brown illegals taking our jobs and welfare checks" to focusing on obscure alleged criminal individuals. I guess that is demanded during your worship services of the

MnSOEMg.jpg
 
OMFG.... How stupid can you possibly be?
The entire document is the ruling. You don't get to parse out some of the court's document and claim the plaintiffs wrote it. A concurring opinion is still part of the court's ruling.

You will find what I quoted in the document put out by the court.


ROFL

The document from the court has attorney statements?

Wow, that's enlightening...

It's called "a transcript," moron.
 
It's interesting to us smarter and less gullible people how you MAGATs suddenly have abandoned the whole idea of "those filthy brown illegals taking our jobs and welfare checks" to focusing on obscure alleged criminal individuals. I guess that is demanded during your worship services of the

MnSOEMg.jpg
It's all about the cruelty. That's what gets the trumptards' tiny weenies hard. As long as migrants are being mistreated, they'll make up any shit they can to tarnish them.
You can't support terrorists that want to destroy America and Israel while living here on a student visa. This is not the feckless Biden administration.
 
Yeah deport Earl to where he is a citizen. The USA :laugh:
We don't know if @Earl is a citizen or not. Neither of you can write English, so it's safe to assume that neither of you should be in the US. Go figure it out in a gulag in El Salvador while your families wait. Maybe you can finish your "medical degree" from prison. :ROFLMAO:
 
Back
Top