Editor of "The New Individualist"

Annie

Annie

Not So Junior Member
Libertarianism may well find it's place. If the candidates sounded more like this, the philosophy might become more widespread. There can be found reasons for the middle of both major parties to move in the direction espoused by libertarians, that Ron Paul managed to attract the fringes of both parties along with some of the middle and many ill-informed college age students should be worrisome.
 
Kathianne said:
Libertarianism may well find it's place. If the candidates sounded more like this, the philosophy might become more widespread. There can be found reasons for the middle of both major parties to move in the direction espoused by libertarians, that Ron Paul managed to attract the fringes of both parties along with some of the middle and many ill-informed college age students should be worrisome.
Click to expand...


Libertarianism has found it's place, but it's candidates sound like Ron Paul.

The status quo fears Ron Paul's talk of monetary reform because they like the ability create all the money they need out of thin air. Libertarianism is not just "free market" zealotry, though the fascists wish it were.
 
uscitizen said:
You do have a disconnect with reality problem don't ya asshat ?
Click to expand...


No. I have a problem with people who see some form of enhanced fascism as the only valid solution to anything. You, for instance, only want more handouts for people as a response to unemployment from globalists selling us out, instead of trying to actually stop globalists from selling us out.
 
uscitizen said:
RP is pro business. Pro business means pro globalization now.
Click to expand...

No it doesn't. That's just what internationalists want it to mean. He's also against fiat currency, the phenomenon that transforms capitalism into fascism. He's also against the wars used to force people into the global commerce system against their will. In a pure ron paul universe, capitalism wouldn't be as morally suspect.
 
umm most all US businesses are deeply intertwined in globalization now. Drink another cup of coffee dude.
 
uscitizen said:
right I keep telling you to not buy Chinese stuff, but you keep right on doing it.
Click to expand...

We need a top down policy. We have always used tariffs and embargoes for political and economic ends. A glut of chinese cheap stuff has nearly destroyed other competitors in many markets. With a better policy, we could give non slave goods a chance to succeed, and non slave master manufacturers a chance to flourish.
 
Kathianne said:
Libertarianism may well find it's place. If the candidates sounded more like this, the philosophy might become more widespread. There can be found reasons for the middle of both major parties to move in the direction espoused by libertarians, that Ron Paul managed to attract the fringes of both parties along with some of the middle and many ill-informed college age students should be worrisome.
Click to expand...

He's just a stupid neolibertarian loon. Of course you would like him, but he's going to hell in a handbasket with all the neoconservatives. Libertarianism and war and unjustified interventionism WILL NEVER WORK WITH LIBERTARIANISM. EVER.
 
Watermark said:
He's just a stupid neolibertarian loon. Of course you would like him, but he's going to hell in a handbasket with all the neoconservatives. Libertarianism and war and unjustified interventionism WILL NEVER WORK WITH LIBERTARIANISM. EVER.
Click to expand...

So even the 'libertarians' are breaking into splinters. Too bad they never could get it together. :clink:
 
Kathianne said:
So even the 'libertarians' are breaking into splinters. Too bad they never could get it together. :clink:
Click to expand...

Neolibertarians have been a part of the libertarian movement for a long time. There's room for them but they will never be predominant, just like neoconservatives never will be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top