Correct.
and your side slams the gateway pundit reporting untrue
but this is Rolling Stone and MSNBC..so now we can put them in the same boat as the gateway pundit
Correct.
and your side slams the gateway pundit reporting untrue
but this is Rolling Stone and MSNBC..so now we can put them in the same boat as the gateway pundit
So every time someone reports what somebody said, it's automatically fake news?
Didnt say that ..but in this case it was
Did they talk to the hospital to verify his outrageous claims? Or did the just go against journalistic standards an ran a unverified story.The local news included a video of a doctor making that claim.
The local news never said it was true story. Not once.
Was what he said true?So every time someone reports what somebody said, it's automatically fake news?
Did they talk to the hospital to verify his outrageous claims? Or did the just go against journalistic standards an ran a unverified story.
Was what he said true?
Were the dogs left behind?Did you ask the same about people in Afghanistan who reported to the journalists about those US military dogs that were left behind?
Did you ask about those journalists who reported that?
Were the dogs left behind?
No but apparently the doctor did.I think you have a problem with memory.
You brought them up not me.You tell me.
You brought them up not me.
No but apparently the doctor did.
Let's go with he was a liar that wanted to hurt the hospital.I wouldn't be surprised. He probably did. Or somebody had something to hide or somebody lied to the doctor.
Let's go with he was a liar that wanted to hurt the hospital.
Let's go with he was a liar that wanted to hurt the hospital.