C
Cancel3
Guest
You mean you've lived in the UK most of your life?
I don't consider the UK gun laws to be reasonable. I prefer Florida's gun laws.
You mean you've lived in the UK most of your life?
If the 2nd Amendment were any less explicit in the Constitution, we would already be a disarmed populace thanks to idiots like Watermark.
The second amendment? The one that says that states have a right to keep armed militias?
I don't consider the UK gun laws to be reasonable. I prefer Florida's gun laws.
Not according to the Supreme Court.
Not according to the Supreme Court.
Not according to the supreme court of the past two years. It has been according to every other supreme court in US history.
Florida is a perfect example of what happens to a perfectly good place if you let Republicans rule too long. Even Mississippi is more reasonable.
One problem with your theory, and that is that the violent crime rate in Florida is lower than its been in several decades.
There are more gun owners than ever, and a lower rate of violent crime than ever.
Doesn't sound like a problem to me.
Not according to the supreme court of the past two years. It has been according to every other supreme court in US history.
As I've stated before, crime is the lowest it's been in several decades in practically every industrialized nation in the world. The US, however, is notable for having some of the highest rates.
But our violent crimes per capita rates have been dropping faster than England or Australia's. (two nations that have instituted very strict gun regulations)
There are a thousand different correlations that you could make Solitary. The fact is that violent crime just doesn't correlate with gun ownership. Gun ownership has always been high in the US.
Not according to the supreme court of the past two years. It has been according to every other supreme court in US history.