Chap, you're incoherent. There is no comparison between Kennedy & Palin, or Paris Hilton.
If you're trying to make some sort of logical argument, it is severely undermined by exaggeration.
I know. Palin has much more experience than Kennedy.
Chap, you're incoherent. There is no comparison between Kennedy & Palin, or Paris Hilton.
If you're trying to make some sort of logical argument, it is severely undermined by exaggeration.
I hold a different view of her experience, knowledge, and qualifications.
I hold a different view of her experience, knowledge, and qualifications.
Chap, you're incoherent. There is no comparison between Kennedy & Palin, or Paris Hilton.
If you're trying to make some sort of logical argument, it is severely undermined by exaggeration.
Chap, you're incoherent. There is no comparison between Kennedy & Palin, or Paris Hilton.
If you're trying to make some sort of logical argument, it is severely undermined by exaggeration.
Chap, you're incoherent. There is no comparison between Kennedy & Palin, or Paris Hilton.
If you're trying to make some sort of logical argument, it is severely undermined by exaggeration.
Do you believe Kennedy holds higher qualifications than Palin does?
It is like we live in fuedal times.......Kennedy, Kennedy, Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton, Kennedy. I'm ready for someone named Jones to take office of some sort.
Do you believe Kennedy holds higher qualifications than Palin does?
I posted the qualifications, 35, US citizen for at least 9 years, resident of the state in which they seek the office.People keep talking about "qualifications" yet I still haven't seen anyone set out what "qualifications" they deem sufficient to become a Senator. It's really weird.
Basically I would wonder if they would be elected rather than selected.People keep talking about "qualifications" yet I still haven't seen anyone set out what "qualifications" they deem sufficient to become a Senator. It's really weird.
There is a reason she didn't run for the office and sought to be appointed. It is far easier to be elected when running as an incumbent.
Bingo.
Because she would likely lose a hard-fought primary?Really? Bingo? Who would she run against? Schumer? Clinton? Not likely. She's seeking to be appointed because she can and she didn't run previously because it would have been a shitty decision to do so.
They're retarded people who allow their judgement of people and events to revolve wrongfully around genitalia.Danotard, what exactly is wrong with feminists? You use it like an insult.