Dano, they simply made a quick official reply that really holds no more merit other than to show they cared and didn't support anybody who would do that to another.
Ok I give a fuck what the McCain or Obama campaign said or thought or bought. Here is what you said in the opening salvo of your post at [ame="http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?t=15269"]Robber Takes Womans Money, Then Mutilates Her for McCain Support - Just Plain Politics![/ame]
So here is your comment at the top which I increased in size. You said criminals, in this case, the man that attacked this woman, don't want you to support the guy that is tough on crime (McCain). Insinuating that this guy, the criminal, supported Obama because he is SOFT on crime. It isn't real difficult to deduce where you were going with this one. We later all of us find out that this woman works for the McCain campaign as a volunteer at a phone bank. She is a McCain supporter. What I was asking of you, is that since you were able to so reasonably deduce that this fictional criminal was an Obama supporter because criminals don't like candidates that are hard on criminals. So what I was asking was that you now use your amazing powers of deduction to explain to us WHY a person that supports McCain would do this and what it is about THIS type of criminal that makes them likely to support McCain. Now, that being said, I'll let you off the hook. The point I was trying to make was that you IMMEDIATELY jumped to make this an issue of Obama being the candidate of choice for violent criminals and that they support him because he will just let them run rampant, being soft on crime and all. I don't think there is anything about McCain that makes this particular criminal, the woman who carverd on her own face, more likely to support McCain. But you still don't seem to get the point I was getting at. You wish to remain purposely obtuse and claim that I was trying to "protect Obama" when the real truth is when you first posted this I was on her side to the extent that I didn't think she made it up, because like you I thought that was a lot of abuse to put yourself through just to try and harm the obama campaign. But I also dismissed YOUR blantant attempt at tarnishing Barack Obama by distant association, which you did by telling us all how this guy could not possibly support McCain because McCain is much harder on crime. Ergo he MUST support Obama. You made this ugly, but you did it subtley and didn't think any of us were swift enough to catch you at it.