Dixie how about the demand aspect ? If demand goes down or stays flat should not prices either drop or stay flat ?
You just adressed 1/2 of supply and demand.
Umm dixie I believe our demand for oil has been flat or decreased a bit over the past year. Why is the price going up ? And dont say china and india, their demand curve has slowed as well and we use about 75% of the oil in the world so we are most of the demand.
The speculative bubble will collapse eventually and the price will shock-drop. Dixie, the fact that you had to ask what oil speculation had to do with the price of oil is a clear indication that you have outmatched yourself on this thread.
And Dicks, supply and demand are equally culpable in a price curve. To say it's one and not the other is ignorant (at best). Decreasing demand would affect the equation the same as increasing the supply to a similar degree.
We've already established (back on page 1) that Speculators do not have any leverage over price. I didn't have to ask, I already knew this. It is why they call them "speculators" ...they are "speculating" on the price going up or down. Kind of like gamblers. Now, if you went to Vegas and lost money all weekend, would it be the fault of all the gamblers, or just that you had shitty luck?
It is impossible for me to outmatch myself, but if anyone could outmatch me, it would be myself, you sure as hell aren't about to.
"culpable?" If you mean they both play a role in the equation, I agree, that's why they call it Supply and Demand. Did something I post indicate to you that I thought differently? My goodness, it seems I have gone over this about a dozen times already, but once again, the issue of high gas prices is Supply and Demand.
Your ignorance is apparent in your language. "Decreasing demand would affect the equation the same as increasing the supply to a similar degree." WTF kind of convoluted bullshit is this? Either demand affects the equation to the same degree or to a similar degree, it can't be both.
I declare, I have looked through my entire posting, and don't see a single place where I ever said that demand doesn't effect the economic condition of price. Is this something you dreamed I said, or wished I said? I guess it must be, because it doesn't appear anywhere in this thread.
Let's go over this one more time, Supply is more important in this situation than Demand, not because Supply has more of an effect on the equation, but because we can affect the equation more with Supply. We can not conserve and cut demand enough to offset the reduced Supply from OPEC production cuts. Unless we increase Supply, we will continue to see an increase in gas prices, because the issue is our domestic supply of oil.
This is what you said, so you can sit and spin: "The main issue is Supply, not Demand."
The MAIN issue is not either SUPPLY or DEMAND, it's the interaction of the two on a price curve continuum.
The fact that you called my very straight forward statement of fact "convoluted bullshit" shows that you never took econ 101 (or didn't pass). If you don't understand what's going on, don't try to act like you do. It doesn't come across well.
By the way, all the studies I've heard about say that drilling in ANWAR will affect the price very little at the pump. Domestic supplies of oil are not sufficient to tilt the world market in our favor. In fact, we sell a hell of a lot of our domestic oil to China anyway. Make your Republicans stop that before you get all high and mighty about tree huggers, Dicks.
A degree in economics. You were a fucking paginator for a nothing newspaper, Dicks. You called yourself "an artist." Economics is an art now, I guess.
Monopoly doesn't count, and mail order degrees are right out as well.
No, I was a photographer for a newspaper, and I consider myself an artist. There is no unwritten law that artists can't study economics, is there? I also have a law degree, although I never took the bar, it was mostly for business purposes. I have actually done a number of things in my life, unlike yourself.