How to think about God.

Celticguy said:
curious questions but I think they are off topic here.
Click to expand...

ever want to connect missing links of linear ideology to the kinetics of mutually evolving here now? I have done it. kinetic evolving into a compounding total sum of ancestries of each species that ever occupying time in the space of this atmosphere during the 5 billion revolutions this planet added since the solar system has been perpetually balancing here now.

Kinetic constant changes between erosion and decomposing lifetimes, thermodynamic rules apply here inorganically as well as ancestrally with regards to compounding additions equal to eroding and decaying results present conceived to decomposed as replacements to those added the reproduction.

See your social mind cannot expand around things not in syllables. Your brain is navigating event horizons already isolating each object outside your skin as eternally changing total sum outside as taking place inside your flesh. God or no God is always open for debate, now being eternity is off limits in social arena of ideas.
 
serenity said:
ever want to connect missing links of linear ideology to the kinetics of mutually evolving here now? I have done it. kinetic evolving into a compounding total sum of ancestries of each species that ever occupying time in the space of this atmosphere during the 5 billion revolutions this planet added since the solar system has been perpetually balancing here now.

Kinetic constant changes between erosion and decomposing lifetimes, thermodynamic rules apply here inorganically as well as ancestrally with regards to compounding additions equal to eroding and decaying results present conceived to decomposed as replacements to those added the reproduction.

See your social mind cannot expand around things not in syllables. Your brain is navigating event horizons already isolating each object outside your skin as eternally changing total sum outside as taking place inside your flesh. God or no God is always open for debate, now being eternity is off limits in social arena of ideas.
Click to expand...
isnt that special ?
still off topic. start your own thread if you want to go there.
 
Celticguy said:
One can only "guess" as to whether there is a god(s) or not, it cannot be proven one way or the other.
As to the "i dont know", that is not being an atheist, again, by definition.
As to the "blindly" there is enough to justify either choice though never enough to know for sure.
Thats why they call it faith.
Click to expand...

Not sure what you point is here, CG.

On the question of "Is there a GOD or are there any gods?"...the only thing one can do is to make a blind guess.

Any guess made is no better than leaving it to the toss of a coin.
 
Frank Apisa said:
Not sure what you point is here, CG.

On the question of "Is there a GOD or are there any gods?"...the only thing one can do is to make a blind guess.

Any guess made is no better than leaving it to the toss of a coin.
Click to expand...

in a sense, that IS my my point. cant be proven but just maybe it can be deduced. there will always be an element of faith involved but it seems people are able to sort it out sufficiently to lend their faith one way or the other.
 
Celticguy said:
in a sense, that IS my my point. cant be proven but just maybe it can be deduced. there will always be an element of faith involved but it seems people are able to sort it out sufficiently to lend their faith one way or the other.
Click to expand...

God created the world and guides it. Did I leave anything out from your definition?
 
Celticguy said:
in a sense, that IS my my point. cant be proven but just maybe it can be deduced. there will always be an element of faith involved but it seems people are able to sort it out sufficiently to lend their faith one way or the other.
Click to expand...

One...I do not think the existence or non-existence of any GOD or gods...can be deduced. I just cannot. One can guess one way or the other...but "deduced?"

Anyway, two...the "element of faith" is nothing more than insisting that the blind guess is correct.

The insisting is an absurdity.

Let me be clear about this, though: Either there is at least one god...or there are none. The blind guesses "There is a GOD" and "There are no gods" have this one factor in common:

One of them is correct.

Either there is at least one god...or there are no gods.

We just do not know which it is...and both assertions are just blind guesses.

Having "faith" in your blind guess is nothing more than insisting your blind guess cannot be wrong.
 
Celticguy said:
isnt that special ?
still off topic. start your own thread if you want to go there.
Click to expand...

the topic is how to think about God, correct? Those that believe in God say God knows all.

OK what happens when the idea time doesn't separate past, present, future evolving going on here now?

Genetics and molecular migration sustain perpetual motion between expanding compounding details never duplicated and contracting results never the same form since conceived in ancestral position here now. Gee 7,000 years of human intellect real isn't real just evaporated except for people that mind possibilities real isn't kinetically self evident as life taking place here now.
 
Frank Apisa said:
One...I do not think the existence or non-existence of any GOD or gods...can be deduced. I just cannot. One can guess one way or the other...but "deduced?"

Anyway, two...the "element of faith" is nothing more than insisting that the blind guess is correct.

The insisting is an absurdity.

Let me be clear about this, though: Either there is at least one god...or there are none. The blind guesses "There is a GOD" and "There are no gods" have this one factor in common:

One of them is correct.

Either there is at least one god...or there are no gods.

We just do not know which it is...and both assertions are just blind guesses.

Having "faith" in your blind guess is nothing more than insisting your blind guess cannot be wrong.
Click to expand...

But Frank, I do not insist anything of you or anyone else. Faith is a personal thing.
That said, clearly there are quite a lot of people who share the same faith.
But only the mohamadans do this insisting.
On this point, one could deduce that their version of God is false.
 
I could be very satisfied by all non-Christians simply regarding Christianity the way they think of cream in their coffee.

It helps neutralize the harshness and bitter taste of the drink.

Even if you don't get a buzz from the drink (Christianity), it is easier and more pleasing to swallow our society with the creamy smoothness of Christianity added to your mug.
 
Drummie123 said:
I could be very satisfied by all non-Christians simply regarding Christianity the way they think of cream in their coffee.

It helps neutralize the harshness and bitter taste of the drink.

Even if you don't get a buzz from the drink (Christianity), it is easier and more pleasing to swallow our society with the creamy smoothness of Christianity added to your mug.
Click to expand...

I like "you do your thing and I will do mine, I will attempt to stay out of your way, please return the favor".

Obviously we life in a Dark Age now and that will not happen, but it should be the goal.

To get back to being civilized.
 
Drummie123 said:
I could be very satisfied by all non-Christians simply regarding Christianity the way they think of cream in their coffee.

It helps neutralize the harshness and bitter taste of the drink.

Even if you don't get a buzz from the drink (Christianity), it is easier and more pleasing to swallow our society with the creamy smoothness of Christianity added to your mug.
Click to expand...

No.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
I like "you do your thing and I will do mine, I will attempt to stay out of your way, please return the favor".

Obviously we life in a Dark Age now and that will not happen, but it should be the goal.

To get back to being civilized.
Click to expand...

You sound like you are mentally ill. Not joking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top