If race doesn't exist.

[Flash]

Stupid comment. Of course it was just made up. How do you think the term was first coined?


There are identifiable differences between any two people. Therefore there is a race for each human. There the term is meaningless.


Like I said, a different "race" for each person. Stupid.

There's no official listing of "races" I see.

Differences between individuals do not constitute a race for each person--that is ignorant.

However, there are identifiable similarities between groups of people we can use to classify.

 

[IBDaMann]

Yes, race is largely superficial although identifiable by DNA and skeletal features.

False. Your position is based on nothing but absurd misinformation.

I notice there is still no authoritative list of races. Do you have any idea why that is?

 

[IBDaMann]

Differences between individuals do not constitute a race for each person--that is ignorant.

Your entire position is ignorant and contradictory. There are no biological races.

If a man of "race A" has two children with a woman of "race B", and each child acquires 50% of his DNA from the father and 50% from the mother, are the children of the same race per their same genes or of different races per their visible differences?

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

If Race didn't exist then there shouldn't be Racism, just Prejudices.
But, then again that might disrupt a cornerstone of the Leftist agenda.

We are all prejudice- but we are not all racists!

Racism is a question of oneself, that only you can answer!

You may always be prejudice from natural instinct, but you actually have to choose to be racist or not.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Why would you label Tiger a Cablinasian?

I didn't. He did.

FYI, I don't do text walls. I've already conceded you've won the semantic argument. What more do you want?