If the Democrats can’t landslide the Republicans this year....

My panties ARE wadded up. They're wadded up in a big, friggin' unravelable ball.

Honestly, I can't believe this thing is tied. It's ridiculous. America is either stupid, or racist, or suicidal. And when I say "America," I don't mean all Americans; just enough to make the critical difference, as they did in 2000 & 2004.

Obama has not taken it to the Republicans about their serious failures. He has not gone on the attack. He is still playing the nice guy, so the people are not seeing what has happened.

Americans, by & large, have a memory about as long as the average sitcom.

Marion Barry was busted smoking crack on video, and then a few years later was elected mayor of DC again.

George Wallace stood on the steps of the University of Alabama to try and stop blacks from being allowed in school there. Then 4 years later he carried the black vote in his reelection as Governor.

Ronald Reagan was embroiled in a huge scandal involving trading arms for hostages. And a few years later he is granted virtual sainthood by republicans.
 
Obama has not taken it to the Republicans about their serious failures. He has not gone on the attack. He is still playing the nice guy, so the people are not seeing what has happened.

Obama also made a promise that he wasn't going to run a smear campaign....so far all he has done was reply to McCain's attack ads.....it's also a good reason to have Biden......he can do it, while Obama tackles the issues.

It promises to be a different kind of race.......attack ads may get the attention, but they do get old.......while the issues don't.
 
Everyone agrees he should be ahead by double-digits now. The national conversation regarding this has gotten absurd...oh, what could it be? It must be his inexperience, or William Ayers! What, oh what could it possibly be?

obama is a wimpy candidate who is entirely fluff and as more and more people get to know him, they begin to see that. For christs sake his website says "powered by hope"

Only you doe eyed retards think he should be in double digits.
 
Like I said, between 20-25% of DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY VOTERS in the last few primaries said in EXIT POLLS (so, they had no problem telling someone to their face) that race was a significant factor in their vote.

You do the math. Yeah, I know - I'm making "too big of a deal" about it. It's just a quarter of the electorate; no biggie.
 
My panties ARE wadded up. They're wadded up in a big, friggin' unravelable ball.

Honestly, I can't believe this thing is tied. It's ridiculous. America is either stupid, or racist, or suicidal. And when I say "America," I don't mean all Americans; just enough to make the critical difference, as they did in 2000 & 2004.


LOL i know right? whoever would have thought that not everyone agrees with you!
 
offense against obama does not mean I am defending mccain. I am not going to vote for him, I have never liked him, and if he is elected, after i get over my elation at how absolutely crushed democrats would be, I'll be sad that we are stuck with mcmunster for four years.

But this shit happens every year. Democrats talk as though they have their new christ politician, they jump for glee, with a smile wider than that guy on the levitra commericials, and then when the (superior) republican political smear machine kicks it into high gear you say "no faaaair, they are being meaaaaan", "why isn't our super awesome candidate ahead by 20 points? I agree with him, how come everyone else doesn't????"
 
Like I said, between 20-25% of DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY VOTERS in the last few primaries said in EXIT POLLS (so, they had no problem telling someone to their face) that race was a significant factor in their vote.

You do the math. Yeah, I know - I'm making "too big of a deal" about it. It's just a quarter of the electorate; no biggie.

I'm curious........did it mention how many out of those 20-25% were black saying they wouldn't vote for a white man?
 
I'm curious........did it mention how many out of those 20-25% were black saying they wouldn't vote for a white man?

That stats were ridiculous; they DID have it broken down, and the vast majority of those 20-25% did vote for Hillary.

So, there you go...
 
I wonder how many people blamed racism for Al Sharpton's poor showing?
 
Everyone agrees he should be ahead by double-digits now. The national conversation regarding this has gotten absurd...oh, what could it be? It must be his inexperience, or William Ayers! What, oh what could it possibly be?


You know it's funny to me, it seems Democrat Liberals are the ones obsessed with race, not Republicans. We don't care what color you are, as long as you can get the job done.... Condi and Colin are good examples. It's the Democrat Libs who keep bringing up this thing about Obama's race, as if it makes some difference in how we vote.

Here's the thing, going by the last two elections, we pretty much established the country is split right down the middle... 50/50.... now, if Republicans vote Republican and Democrats vote Democrat, and Obama loses, wouldn't that mean the racist people who didn't support Obama, came from the Democrat side, not the Republican?

I think those of you who seem to be obsessed with race, are the ones who aren't about to vote for a black man, and you are simply covering your tracks early here... after all, no one will know how you cast your vote on election day, and if you can make this 'racist' charge stick, it will be a feather in your cap, and next time your party can nominate a white candidate with the clear conscience you are doing it "because of all those racist Republicans out there."
 
As much as I hate to agree with Dixie, he does bring up a good point. If the republicans are so racist, why is it that the republican's cabinet has more minorities than any presidential cabinet in history?
 
As much as I hate to agree with Dixie, he does bring up a good point. If the republicans are so racist, why is it that the republican's cabinet has more minorities than any presidential cabinet in history?

I don't really think appointments are the best way to judge that. Whenever politicians have to appoint people, they are making a rational decision to save THEIR OWN ass, and they know they have to put up a diverse facade. Clarence Thomas, for instance, was completely unqualified to be a supreme court justice, and was appointed, basically, because he was the only conservative black guy H.W. could think of at the time, and he knew he need to replace the only black guy on the court with another black guy or else he'd face a whole lot of shit at election time.

But who do Republicans actually elect to lead them?

White people, unanimously. There's not a single black Republican elected to federal office in America. There are also no black Republican governors, and I do not believe there are any black statewide officials at all, although I can't verify that.

BTW, Clinton had a more diverse cabinet. Seven of his cabinet appointments were black, with a smaller cabinet, so it was actually disproportionately diverse. Although, again, that was mostly a facade. None of the black appointments really ever held a lot of power, besides possibly Condi. Executive cabinets these days generally don't have a lot of responsibility, which is why so many high profile appointments have quit over the years.
 
Last edited:
I don't really think appointments are the best way to judge that. Whenever politicians have to appoint people, they are making a rational decision to save THEIR OWN ass, and they know they have to put up a diverse facade. Clarence Thomas, for instance, was completely unqualified to be a supreme court justice, and was appointed, basically, because he was the only conservative black guy H.W. could think of at the time, and he knew he need to replace the only black guy on the court with another black guy or else he'd face a whole lot of shit at election time.

But who do Republicans actually elect to lead them?

White people, unanimously. There's not a single black Republican elected to federal office in America. There are also no black Republican governors, and I do not believe there are any black statewide officials at all, although I can't verify that.

BTW, Clinton had a more diverse cabinet. Seven of his cabinet appointments were black, with a smaller cabinet, so it was actually disproportionately diverse. Although, again, that was mostly a facade. None of the black appointments really ever held a lot of power, besides possibly Condi. Executive cabinets these days generally don't have a lot of responsibility, which is why so many high profile appointments have quit over the years.

I was under the impression that Secretary of State was a fairly powerful position. I was also under the impression that Colin Powell is black.

I think that saying Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell were just "tokens" is gravely underestimating the contributions that these two made.
 
I was under the impression that Secretary of State was a fairly powerful position. I was also under the impression that Colin Powell is black.

I think that saying Condoleezza Rice and Colin Powell were just "tokens" is gravely underestimating the contributions that these two made.

Do I think that Colin Powell is a good guy? Yes. Do I think there are other people more qualified to be SOD? Yes. Do I think there are people more qualified than Condi to be SOS? Yes.
 
Do I think that Colin Powell is a good guy? Yes. Do I think there are other people more qualified to be SOD? Yes. Do I think there are people more qualified than Condi to be SOS? Yes.

Hell, I think there are a lot of people more qualified to be president than either of the two candidates we have to choose from.

But that is not the point. My point was that the supposedly racist republicans have put two blacks in higher positions than the democrats. And to call those two Secretaries of State "tokens" is shameful. They were chosen because of their qualifications and their party loyalties. If they were just for show they wouldn't have been in that position.

And while you are correct that there are no black republican governors, the democrats haven't exactly been electing blacks to gubenatorial offices in droves. Since the reconstruction there have been exactly 3 black democrat governors.
 
But this shit happens every year. Democrats talk as though they have their new christ politician, they jump for glee, with a smile wider than that guy on the levitra commericials, and then when the (superior) republican political smear machine kicks it into high gear you say "no faaaair, they are being meaaaaan", "why isn't our super awesome candidate ahead by 20 points? I agree with him, how come everyone else doesn't????"

QFT
 
And to call those two Secretaries of State "tokens" is shameful.

I did not.

They were chosen because of their qualifications and their party loyalties.

And their convenient skin color.


If they were just for show they wouldn't have been in that position.

They can basically do the job and they're black and conservative, so like Clarence Thomas, they are thrown into very high office to show how unracist conservatives are.

And while you are correct that there are no black republican governors, the democrats haven't exactly been electing blacks to gubenatorial offices in droves. Since the reconstruction there have been exactly 3 black democrat governors.

And how long has it been since the Democratic party wasn't dominated by the south? About thirty years.
 
offense against obama does not mean I am defending mccain. I am not going to vote for him, I have never liked him, and if he is elected, after i get over my elation at how absolutely crushed democrats would be, I'll be sad that we are stuck with mcmunster for four years.

But this shit happens every year. Democrats talk as though they have their new christ politician, they jump for glee, with a smile wider than that guy on the levitra commericials, and then when the (superior) republican political smear machine kicks it into high gear you say "no faaaair, they are being meaaaaan", "why isn't our super awesome candidate ahead by 20 points? I agree with him, how come everyone else doesn't????"

LOL BECAUSE LIBERALS ARE PUSSIES RGHT?! LOL YOU ARE SO CREATIVE N FUNNY
 
Back
Top