Reasonable debate centered on situational ethics building realities where actual life is being ignored as physically limited to reproductions ancestrally timed apart now in plain sight for what, picking sides of most popular form of denying physical limitations as practiced so far.
Where is the debate about what went wrong to start with instead of always arguing on never getting back to how life actually works sustaining spontaneously alive while reproductively added to ever changing forms shaped here now.
Simple compounding did to does remain as never being the same total sum achieved from now on. Every reproduction regardless its species is 50/50 each parent, 25% the 4 grandparents, 12.5% great grandparents, 6.25% great great.
All that being 100% 1 of a kind timed apart now as equally occupying space in this atmosphere. Kinetic results not potential differences of opinions governing outcomes from now on like there is a tomorrow factually considered possible because everyone agrees now cannot be point of origin to only reporductively timed apart in living plain sight.
What is the negative nobody can historically disprovecomparing beliefs life is more than simultaneously alive as spontaneously here?