Is this the White Power sign?

[T. A. Gardner]

Nice list. Not all are factual court losses since the suits are still in play or the link is an opinion. Their silence on Hamas is interesting.

Your continued hatred of anything Left of you is also noted.

Are you an apologist for the SPLC? They're one-sided scum who have no scruples about lying to destroy someone they disagree with. As a source, they're thoroughly discredited. They make Alex Jones look good.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Here is a sign I personally chose just for you!

YOU decided it would be a good idea to cite the KKK/SPLC in your racist screed. Getting mad at me isn't going to change anything.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Are you an apologist for the SPLC? They're one-sided scum who have no scruples about lying to destroy someone they disagree with. As a source, they're thoroughly discredited. They make Alex Jones look good.

No, Terry. I simply support the Constitution. If they get sued and lose, that's on them. If you want to hate the 260M+ Americans to the left of you, that's your choice. If you want to incite violence against them, I support law enforcement charging you for it.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

YOU decided it would be a good idea to cite the KKK/SPLC in your racist screed. Getting mad at me isn't going to change anything.

You make a good wingman for Terry, Down Under.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

No, Terry. I simply support the Constitution. If they get sued and lose, that's on them. If you want to hate the 260M+ Americans to the left of you, that's your choice. If you want to incite violence against them, I support law enforcement charging you for it.

If you want to cite the SPLC as a credible source, be prepared for a lot of blowback and pushback, because they aren't a credible source. As for the above, that's just angry drivel no doubt you're tossing at me for blasting the radical Left for being the pieces of shit they are.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

If you want to cite the SPLC as a credible source, be prepared for a lot of blowback and pushback, because they aren't a credible source. As for the above, that's just angry drivel no doubt you're tossing at me for blasting the radical Left for being the pieces of shit they are.

Meh.

Here, Terry, push back on this: https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2023/10/10/patriot-front-leader-identified-texas
PATRIOT FRONT LEADER IDENTIFIED IN TEXAS
A Texas man with a past conviction for aggravated assault with a deadly weapon has been identified as a leader in the white nationalist Patriot Front group, a Hatewatch investigation has revealed.

Brenner Alexander Cole, 25, of Driftwood, Texas, has been a Patriot Front member since at least 2021 and since has assumed a leadership role within the group, according to leaked documents found by the media collective Unicorn Riot. The cache of leaked documents, which includes audio recordings of group meetings, shows that Cole became a network director for Patriot Front on Dec. 10, 2021; this role helps to plan propaganda runs, coordinate Patriot Front demonstrations and recruit new members. Cole also appears to have planned to drop a Patriot Front banner over an FBI billboard that advertises how to report hate crimes, but whether the action was carried out is unclear....

...Patriot Front is a white nationalist hate group known for spreading racist propaganda and parading unannounced in cities across the U.S. They often chant racist and anti-immigrant slogans and carry banners with bigoted messaging. Thomas Rousseau, 25, of Grapevine, Texas, leads the group, but he relies on a loyal group of middle managers, including Cole, as network directors to manage Patriot Front members’ activities in specific regions. Cole manages the south Texas region for Patriot Front.

 

[IBDaMann]

The first sign that you think is three is "W".

Nope. You should recall from your deaf studies that it is not a "W" if one is showing the back of the hand. You shouldn't need this explained to you.

 

[AProudLefty]

Nope. You should recall from your deaf studies that it is not a "W" if one is showing the back of the hand. You shouldn't need this explained to you.

Sighs

 

[IBDaMann]

Sighs

You're supposed to be holding your breath. This doesn't work if you are breathing.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

You're supposed to be holding your breath. This doesn't work if you are breathing.

^^^
More proof of Sybil's cognitive disorder; he's delusional.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Because outside of class prejudice among themselves, there were no white slave ships, no additional laws passed to grant white folk equal status as human beings with the aforementioned groups, no media images of white folk as genuinely ignorant, happy-go-lucky fools in general (and if they should any "smarts", they were shifty eyed criminals), no history/social text in our grade schools that barely acknowledge white folk (and if they did, it was in a token mindset).

I could go on, but hopefully you get the message.

P.S. - As it stands, the vast majority of folk who scream "white pride" are usually belonging to groups or of the mindset that want's expulsion/banning of all non-white folks/immigrants, the dismantling of all Civil Rights laws, the New Deal and any social service that protects/aids non-white folk from systematic racism from banks, real estate companies, hotels, etc.

Got that?

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Geeko Sportivo View Post
It was non-professional- and yes it was the WHITE POWER OK sign!

You may read all about it here!

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/...ght-wing-troll

The SPLC? You are using a thoroughly discredited source, you know. It's not just that they're radical Leftists, it's that they've repeatedly been smacked down, even in court, for lying, obfuscating, and just plain making shit up, not to mention being selective in who they call a "hate group" (you are not going on their list if you're a radical Leftist hate group).

I think you are referring to one or two cases were the SPLC was proven wrong in court in one of its denunciations. Not bad ratio for an organization that's been around for 52 years.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Because outside of class prejudice among themselves, there were no white slave ships, no additional laws passed to grant white folk equal status as human beings with the aforementioned groups, no media images of white folk as genuinely ignorant, happy-go-lucky fools in general (and if they should any "smarts", they were shifty eyed criminals), no history/social text in our grade schools that barely acknowledge white folk (and if they did, it was in a token mindset).

I could go on, but hopefully you get the message.

P.S. - As it stands, the vast majority of folk who scream "white pride" are usually belonging to groups or of the mindset that want's expulsion/banning of all non-white folks/immigrants, the dismantling of all Civil Rights laws, the New Deal and any social service that protects/aids non-white folk from systematic racism from banks, real estate companies, hotels, etc.

Got that?

What I get is you have no knowledge of history.

There were hundreds of thousands of Whites enslaved by the Barbary Pirates, and other groups in Africa who took their ships and sold the crews into slavery. It was common practice across Africa at the time.

https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-africa/white-slaves-barbary-002171
https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/empire_seapower/white_slaves_01.shtml

So, your myopic and jaundiced view of history as told to you by equally idiotic Leftist academics is fucked up. Well over a million Whites, mostly Europeans ended up enslaved in Africa where the slave trade originated.

You can take your shit, racist, views of history and shove them up you ass.

 

[Taichiliberal]

No, it's accurate.

Southern Poverty Law Center Settles Lawsuit After Falsely Labeling 'Extremist' Organization
https://www.newsweek.com/splc-nawaz-million-apologizes-981879

Hint: The SPLC settled rather than lose.

CORAL RIDGE MINISTRIES MEDIA, INC. v. SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/21-802

Hint: The SPLC lost this one too

Southern Poverty Law Center Slapped with Racketeering Suit Over ‘False Hate Group Designation’
https://lawandcrime.com/lawsuit/sou...ering-suit-over-false-hate-group-designation/

Yet another one they're in the process of losing.

The Supreme Court says it won’t consider rewriting defamation law... yet
https://www.theverge.com/2022/6/27/...-splc-petition-denied-libel-law-actual-malice

And... Smacked down by the Supreme Court...

The Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate-based scam that nearly caused me to be murdered
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...aw-center-hate-groups-scam-column/2022301001/

Lying hurts people and in the SPLC's case gets you massively sued...

SPLC conspicuously silent on pro-Hamas groups in US
https://hotair.com/david-strom/2023...ro-hamas-groups-in-us-n584342#google_vignette

An example of how the SPLC is just a radical Leftist smear group that targets only Conservative, Rightwing groups often undeservedly...

The Bad Hate The Good: The Southern Poverty Law Center Tries To Smear PragerU
https://www.investors.com/politics/columnists/splc-prager-university-hate-groups-left-wing/

And yet another example of the SPLC smearing someone or some group they disagree politically with.

The Southern Poverty Law Center Makes Millions Trafficking Hate
The Center has gotten rich in part thanks to its "hate map," which smears many good people.
https://reason.com/2023/07/19/the-southern-poverty-law-center-makes-millions-trafficking-hate/

The SPLC, today, is nothing but a radical Leftist hate group.

And how many in your list are actual convictions? See, not liking someone/thinking or making a LOT of accusations isn't the same thing. In 52 years, you need to list lawsuits filed against and have won in a court of law, NOT public opinion. Get back when you have that, otherwise don't waste time and space blowing smoke.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

And how many in your list are actual convictions? See, not liking someone/thinking or making a LOT of accusations isn't the same thing. In 52 years, you need to list lawsuits filed against and have won in a court of law, NOT public opinion. Get back when you have that, otherwise don't waste time and space blowing smoke.

They weren't criminal lawsuits you retard. They were civil suits suing for libel, defamation, and the like. Those suing have pretty much uniformly won against the SPLC. And, no, I don't have to satisfy your demand for more proof as that's just a logical fallacy, particularly when you offer ZERO proof of your own in rebuttal.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

I think you are referring to one or two cases were the SPLC was proven wrong in court in one of its denunciations. Not bad ratio for an organization that's been around for 52 years.

FBI: SPLC not a reliable source
https://afajournal.org/past-issues/2017/december/fbi-splc-not-a-reliable-source/

20 State AGs: ‘SPLC Has Been Utterly Discredited as a Reliable Source’
https://www.amren.com/news/2023/02/...een-utterly-discredited-as-a-reliable-source/

The Southern Poverty Law Center isn't authoritative, it's garbage
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...rty-law-center-isnt-authoritative-its-garbage

Law enforcement says the SPLC is unreliable. 20 state attorney generals say it's unreliable, a plethora of journalistic sources, not on the radical Left, say its unreliable. It isn't "one or two cases," it's pervasive across a wide spectrum of sources.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Because outside of class prejudice among themselves, there were no white slave ships, no additional laws passed to grant white folk equal status as human beings with the aforementioned groups, no media images of white folk as genuinely ignorant, happy-go-lucky fools in general (and if they should any "smarts", they were shifty eyed criminals), no history/social text in our grade schools that barely acknowledge white folk (and if they did, it was in a token mindset).

I could go on, but hopefully you get the message.

P.S. - As it stands, the vast majority of folk who scream "white pride" are usually belonging to groups or of the mindset that want's expulsion/banning of all non-white folks/immigrants, the dismantling of all Civil Rights laws, the New Deal and any social service that protects/aids non-white folk from systematic racism from banks, real estate companies, hotels, etc.

Got that?

What I get is you have no knowledge of history.

There were hundreds of thousands of Whites enslaved by the Barbary Pirates, and other groups in Africa who took their ships and sold the crews into slavery. It was common practice across Africa at the time.

https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-africa/white-slaves-barbary-002171
https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/empire_seapower/white_slaves_01.shtml

So, your myopic and jaundiced view of history as told to you by equally idiotic Leftist academics is fucked up. Well over a million Whites, mostly Europeans ended up enslaved in Africa where the slave trade originated.

You can take your shit, racist, views of history and shove them up you ass.

Figures you'd run to a site like this, especially when it states: Our goal is to highlight the very latest archaeological findings, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.


Then there's this:

Overall, we rate Ancient Origins a moderate conspiracy and pseudoscience source based on the promotion of ancient aliens. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting as they also publish credible pro-science information.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ancient-origins/

Oh and here's something for you to chew on: British slavery of Africans began in 1555 and officially ended in 1835. Between 1662 and 1807 British and British colonial ships purchased an estimated 3,415,500 Africans. Of this number, 2,964,800 survived the 'middle passage' and were sold into slavery in the Americas.

American slavery of Africans began in 1619. 10.7 million was the official number of slaves in America. It officially ended in 1865, but it's cousin Jim Crow kept a de facto slavery until about 1964 or 1965.

So did "white slavery" exists. Yep, but without free lancing pirates, it wouldn't have made the numbers your site alludes to.

So once again, T.A., your slavering bigotry clouds your research skills and critical analysis. I believe you were looking in the mirror when you typed your last sentence.

Yeah, the cop flashed the white power sign....a lot of those assholes permeate police forces nationwide. Just Google "racist cops expose convicted" and get educated. Or fuss and fume, lie and deny as is your forte. Carry on.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

FBI: SPLC not a reliable source
https://afajournal.org/past-issues/2017/december/fbi-splc-not-a-reliable-source/

20 State AGs: ‘SPLC Has Been Utterly Discredited as a Reliable Source’
https://www.amren.com/news/2023/02/...een-utterly-discredited-as-a-reliable-source/

The Southern Poverty Law Center isn't authoritative, it's garbage
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...rty-law-center-isnt-authoritative-its-garbage

Law enforcement says the SPLC is unreliable. 20 state attorney generals say it's unreliable, a plethora of journalistic sources, not on the radical Left, say its unreliable. It isn't "one or two cases," it's pervasive across a wide spectrum of sources.

Your sources are just as biased, Terry. AFA? CNS News Blog? Seriously? LOL

If you were still working for the US government, I'd turn you in, Terry.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-family-association/
American Family Association – Bias and Credibility

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cns-news/
CNS News – Bias and Credibility

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/
Washington Examiner – Bias and Credibility

To prove that, unlike you, I'm more balanced...in more ways than one.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/southern-poverty-law-center/
Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) – Bias and Credibility

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Figures you'd run to a site like this, especially when it states: Our goal is to highlight the very latest archaeological findings, peer-reviewed academic research and evidence, as well as offering alternative viewpoints and explanations of science, archaeology, mythology, religion and history around the globe.


Then there's this:

Overall, we rate Ancient Origins a moderate conspiracy and pseudoscience source based on the promotion of ancient aliens. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting as they also publish credible pro-science information.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/ancient-origins/

Oh and here's something for you to chew on: British slavery of Africans began in 1555 and officially ended in 1835. Between 1662 and 1807 British and British colonial ships purchased an estimated 3,415,500 Africans. Of this number, 2,964,800 survived the 'middle passage' and were sold into slavery in the Americas.

American slavery of Africans began in 1619. 10.7 million was the official number of slaves in America. It officially ended in 1865, but it's cousin Jim Crow kept a de facto slavery until about 1964 or 1965.

So did "white slavery" exists. Yep, but without free lancing pirates, it wouldn't have made the numbers your site alludes to.

So once again, T.A., your slavering bigotry clouds your research skills and critical analysis. I believe you were looking in the mirror when you typed your last sentence.

Yeah, the cop flashed the white power sign....a lot of those assholes permeate police forces nationwide. Just Google "racist cops expose convicted" and get educated. Or fuss and fume, lie and deny as is your forte. Carry on.

So, you admit my sites are factually correct, but cannot accept that so you try to denigrate them using an irrelevant Appeal to authority.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Your sources are just as biased, Terry. AFA? CNS News Blog? Seriously? LOL

If you were still working for the US government, I'd turn you in, Terry.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/american-family-association/
American Family Association – Bias and Credibility

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cns-news/
CNS News – Bias and Credibility

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/
Washington Examiner – Bias and Credibility

To prove that, unlike you, I'm more balanced...in more ways than one.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/southern-poverty-law-center/
Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) – Bias and Credibility

And, here we get ad hominem. Attacking the source without any factual evidence doesn't fly.