post 16
Isn't that how the Federal government is designed to work?
- Thread starter Robo
- Start date
post 16
I ran away from nothing. What thread are you even talking about since I just got to this board this morning?
Why can't you apply the word racist properly?
evince
Truthmatters
accept your a racist
you cant name one incident of racism
you are lying about the first black presidents record
YOU refused to face he FACTS that clearly shows the republican party cheats voters of color to win elections
I acecept you are a liar and an idiot since you aren't even applying the word racist correctly.
HAHAHAHA OMG get a clue kid. Stop huffing paint.
No elections were won from cheating, not from the Dems and not from Republicans. You're a habitual liar now.
evince
Truthmatters
there are no facts in your post
you live in a world without facts and nothing but tired old slanderous lies
yeap your a racist
you cant even think of one act of racism
racist don't see anything as racist
Its what makes them racists
evince
Truthmatters
so you deny the entire USA courts records that span decades and that shows many many times the republican party has been caught cheating voters ?
because your not a racist or a republican
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
You haven't a clue about racism kid. It's clear you have some growing up to do since you can't even apply the word right.
Oh and
Making statements
while doing returns
and trying to make
the
thread longer
does not make
your point
any
more
valid.
I didn't deny that. I said NO elections were won from cheating. Try to keep up.
I'm neither but you are a liar and an idiot.
evince
Truthmatters
James Lee's testimony[edit]
On 17 April 2001, James Lee testified, before the McKinney panel, that the state had given DBT the directive to add to the purge list people who matched at least 90% of a last name. DBT objected, knowing that this would produce a huge number of false positives (non-felons).[4]
Lee went on saying that the state then ordered DBT to shift to an even lower threshold of 80% match, allowing also names to be reversed (thus a person named Thomas Clarence could be taken to be the same as Clarence Thomas). Besides this, middle initials were skipped, Jr. and Sr. suffixes dropped, and some nicknames and aliases were added to puff up the list.
"DBT told state officials", testified Lee, "that the rules for creating the [purge] list would mean a significant number of people who were not deceased, not registered in more than one county, or not a felon, would be included on the list. DBT made suggestions to reduce the numbers of eligible voters included on the list". According to Lee, to this suggestion the state told the company, "Forget about it".
"The people who worked on this (for DBT) are very adamant... they told them what would happen", said Lee. "The state expected the county supervisors to be the failsafe." Lee said his company will never again get involved in cleansing voting rolls. "We are not confident any of the methods used today can guarantee legal voters will not be wrongfully denied the right to vote", Lee told a group of Atlanta-area black lawmakers in March 2001.[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_Central_Voter_File#James_Lee.27s_testimony
thousands of perfectly legal voters were tagged as felons when they were not felons
they had their right to vote stripped from them in that election
how many votes did bush win by?
On 17 April 2001, James Lee testified, before the McKinney panel, that the state had given DBT the directive to add to the purge list people who matched at least 90% of a last name. DBT objected, knowing that this would produce a huge number of false positives (non-felons).[4]
Lee went on saying that the state then ordered DBT to shift to an even lower threshold of 80% match, allowing also names to be reversed (thus a person named Thomas Clarence could be taken to be the same as Clarence Thomas). Besides this, middle initials were skipped, Jr. and Sr. suffixes dropped, and some nicknames and aliases were added to puff up the list.
"DBT told state officials", testified Lee, "that the rules for creating the [purge] list would mean a significant number of people who were not deceased, not registered in more than one county, or not a felon, would be included on the list. DBT made suggestions to reduce the numbers of eligible voters included on the list". According to Lee, to this suggestion the state told the company, "Forget about it".
"The people who worked on this (for DBT) are very adamant... they told them what would happen", said Lee. "The state expected the county supervisors to be the failsafe." Lee said his company will never again get involved in cleansing voting rolls. "We are not confident any of the methods used today can guarantee legal voters will not be wrongfully denied the right to vote", Lee told a group of Atlanta-area black lawmakers in March 2001.[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_Central_Voter_File#James_Lee.27s_testimony
thousands of perfectly legal voters were tagged as felons when they were not felons
they had their right to vote stripped from them in that election
how many votes did bush win by?
And Gore only wanted a PORTION of the counties recounted. You are still an idiot and a liar with no proof. Just idiotic conspiracy theories.
Funny you do so much lying and you can't admit Gore didn't want a complete state recount and only just a portion of the counties.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida_election_recount
The news stations even falsely reported the poll closing time.
evince
Truthmatters
Where did I say they didn't? However, in Obama's case he has used it on MANY controversial items.