Yeah, because explaining how basic cleaning of a work area is a job requirement is defending Gingrich. And while we're at this statement, what do you mean "worked for experience, not necessity"? Are you saying experience isn't important in securing a future job? Because otherwise it IS a necessity.
Are you that fucking stupid to think repeating your idiocy will make it magically valid? Kids are taught to pick up their toys and such after they finish, put their books and writing away, pick up their clothes in their rooms.....they're KIDS, that's what they do and should ONLY be required to do. As they get OLDER, then they can take on more responsiblity RELATIVE TO THEIR AGE. Trying to translate that into making them child labor sanitation workers to satisfy Gingrich's "welfare queen" fantasy while making some greedy little management fuck rub his hands in glee over the savings in cutting the cleaning staff of his building is just pathetic. But hey, Donald Trump will exploit them for ratings, and it's NOT YOUR KID, so it's all good, right bunky?
I see you've never been to Detroit for any length of time, otherwise you'd know it's not a fantasy.
Well bunky, you and your leadership had over 20 years to provide CONCLUSIVE PROOF of that fantasy in ANY state in the USA. And so far, ZIP. So you can parrot that BS until the cows come home, as your word is but a piss in the wind.
Ah the false dilemma, a logical fallacy favorite of yours.
So far YOU can't prove otherwise, genius. So you're just pissing in the wind again. But that's not enough for you, since you decide to double it up.
You're stalling, bunky...get to the point, by which I hope you can actually prove something beyond your ability to blow smoke. By suggesting that children should clean their bathroom, I do not suggest a return to child labor on several accounts.
As the chronology of the posts shows, YOU did NOT state such, bunky...so stop lying. How would they be cleaning schools if they were not themselves in school?
Again, beyond putting their books away, why would children suddenly be required to replace the janitor(s)? They are not in school to be janitors....YOU weren't, your siblings and/are kids weren't either. So please spare me this Gingrich garbage. Or how would my suggestion be undermining unionized labor?
THINK STUPID....if kids are doing the jobs of janitors AS BRIEFLY DESCRIBED BY GINGRICH, then there would be NO NEED for a janitor...at best his job would be cut in half, subsequently his salary. Union dues go done, union desolves. Cause and effect....but that requires thinking beyond the headline rhetoric you neocon parrots squawk so loudly. With menial tasks out of the way, taken care of by the people who actually make said mess, the janitor can focus on more critical work, such as building maintenance.
janitors clean up, repairs to structure and such are done by other folk. Also, you just made my point as I stated here earlier....less work means less hours, less pay for the janitor. And again, KIDS ARE NOT IN SCHOOL TO BE JANITORS.
And where do you prove that cleaning a job space isn't essential to maintaining a job in any skilled trade?
Where did I say that, you dishonest dweeb. YOU keep foistering this false premise and then treat it as a valid point. The chronology of the post exposes your folly for all to see. You posted a link, but it's just to your own post. In that case, here is irrefutable evidence that rightly refutes your claim:
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sh...publican-Party-Anymore-!!&p=914815#post914815
