Jack Posobiec

Far-right commentator Jack Posobiec is a current host on One America News Network (OANN), an information network widely known to distort facts and which has been embraced by President Trump. This investigation has found that Posobiec — a Trump favorite — has collaborated with white supremacists, neo-fascists and antisemites for years, while producing propaganda that Trump and his inner circle have publicly celebrated.

“Jack Posobiec’s extensive ties to white supremacists should serve as a wake-up call for anyone who hasn’t made the connection between Trump’s MAGA movement and hate,” said Michael Edison Hayden, the SPLC senior investigative reporter who uncovered the story about Posobiec and his ties to white supremacy and the White House.


Lies.
SPLC are commie fag liars. Garbage scum.
This lying of theirs will hurt them more than him.
 
They hate muslims and Christians. Who don’t they hate?

It's a testimony. No examples were given. Unless you point out the inflammatory statements made by SPLC.

Genspect is anti LGBT and supports forced conversion therapy.

Link to where they incited violence.

His quotes are here: https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/dustin-inman-society/

Another anti LGBT sentiment.

You have not shown them to be a hate group.

SPLC does not hate or shun anyone.
They don't hate commie nazi lying faggots, because that's what they are.
 
You think T. A. has taught you?

You have TOP to entertain you.

Do you have any questions?
T.A. owned you in this thread, dumbfuck.
Apparently he's done some homework on this.
All I do is remember the way Brian Fischer laid it out and snippets I've seen about SPLC over the years.
Good luck throwing your lot in with those douchebags. They have tons of bad karma coming, and it could spread to you.
 
If by agenda you mean advocating for LGBT rights, then I guess so.

This isn't a one-sided issue. Those opposed have legitimate concerns that those advocating for ignore or, worse like the SPLC, attack without regard for debate or reasonable discussion.
The anti-abortion movement has a history of violence.

So? The majority of those opposed to abortion to one degree or another are non-violent. That aside, it is just one issue of many Leftist / Progressive issues that the SPLC takes on to generate their "Hate List."
Not an answer.

Yes, it was. Their Hate Map and the definitions of groups attached to it--or even individual persons in some cases--is the embodiment of the SPLC's hatred. They are implying those groups are worthy of violent opposition.
Not a fallacy. It's a simple question. By saying yes, then applying your logic you hate those Christians.
It is. You used a mote and bailey. You took an isolated, small group that is extremist as your example wanting me to agree with your position--which is correct for that small, isolated group--the "Mote." That is, it makes an easily defended position to base your case on. You then apply the "bailey" to it which is the much larger and difficult to defend position of all other cases.

As for your counter argument above, that's not true either. If I agree with you that the Westboro group is opposed to LGBT that doesn't mean I vilify them or "hate" them. What distinguishes the SPLC as a hate group is they take their position to the next level. They publicly out some group, or even single person, put that group on their hate map, add commentary often in the form of opinion, and then widely disseminate that. In doing so, they make the group a target for often violent opposition.

In doing all that, the SPLC is effectively generating the hate by their commentary. The SPLC also is selective about which groups they target. They rarely, if ever, target any group on the Left. They handwave, ignore, or dismiss such groups with equivocation and weasel words.
 
Let's NOT, because you're just regurgitate your opinion, supposition and conjecture. Here's a thought. Why don't you copy and paste from the SPLC theie criteria for a hate group label. That way, we can see if what you say here is true.
Since you can't defend the SPLC other than with vitriol, ad hominem, and baseless opinion, you got nothing.



And, by the way, the SPLC doesn't hew very closely to their own rules. They frequently target individuals for example. It also adds opinion to its descriptions of groups on its map. That is, it uses non-factual descriptions in labeling groups.
 
Back
Top