Mason Michaels
Verified User
Went over your head!
Koch study: medicare for all saves money
- Thread starter evince
- Start date
Went over your head!
You as a Democrat do it everyday here. I am not sure how you confuse political leanings with socialtel abominations. Plenty of Democrats and liberals on this board I enjoy talking to and discussing political differences. Just because that is not the case with you and your constant everything is "race based" does not mean they are like you at all.
I will ask you only once to prove I have said or implied that. If you are going to talk bullshit, at least have something to back it up.
What do they want to do with it?
Do you mean with the Medicare for all? You know that has 0% of passing.
Isn't she under indictment for welfare fraud?
I sure hope so.
I am pretty discriminating, but not based on skin color.
Most common sense thing I have seen on this board in a very long time. I may not agree with your politics, but I certainly agree with this.
You can deny things because you don't like the truth.
Wait, that's what you did.
Again, I've given you a face to face way to not be anonymous. You refuse.
You wouldn't have to do anything. What you want would give you the ability to deny again. Face to face wouldn't give you an out.
You should be willing to look me in the eye since you think you're such a man.
Just like you said with this nonsense you support with healthcare, you don't know until you try it.
Appears to me you'll find any out you can.
CharacterAssassin
Verified User
Lulz. I challenged him to fly out to L.A.
Tucked his tail between his legs and ran like a bitch.
hvilleherb
Verified User
Anything to stay away from socialized medical care.
Nowhere in the delegated powers of Congress does it give Congress authority over healthcare coverage. The left wing claim of it falling under "general welfare" doesn't fly. That's nothing more than those that want a big federal government twisting it to claim the Constitution saying something it does not say. The 10th Amendment states that the power not delegated to the federal government are reserved to the States. Since healthcare is not a delegated power, that means the power and authority over healthcare belongs to the States. If a State does not choose to deal with it, reserved powers doesn't mean it automatically defaults to the federal government as a delegated power.
The Constitutional difference between Obamacare and Romney care is that Romneycare was done on the level at which the Constitution specifically states is can be done and Obamacare was done on a level to which the Constitution gives no delegated authority to act. Don't take that to mean I agree with the concept of Romneycare. However, I do support where the Constitution says authority should lie and it simply doesn't give the federal government authority over healthcare, therefore, Obamacare isn't within what the Constitution says the federal government can do.
Hawaii tried single payer for HAWAII. While I don't agree with the concept, I do support HAWAII being able to make such a decision as long as it affects HAWAII and the residents of HAWAII only. It was done at the level which the Constitution says it can be done.
So you say. Can you prove it?
I'll bet you love McCain now. He couldn't beat Obama so he decided to kiss his ass and push you back in line.
There's a reason you can't make sense of it. You're as dumb as the typical nigger.
Mason Michaels
Verified User
Funny the rest of the world has single payer.
Not one of them want our system!
You own stock in healthcare insurance companies?
Life is Golden
Saint
And their heads of state come here when they need cutting edge medicine.
Single payer is shithole care, death care is a more appropriate descriptor.