Liberals will win majority of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, CNN projects

The only possible reason anyone outside of WI would give two pinches of piss who's on the supreme court of that state is if the Dems are planning more election shenanigans in the future. Or of course if you need to kill your baby while travelling through or visiting. There is that important activity to protect.

I can understand why these losers are jumping up in the air and clicking their nuts though. After being so thoroughly drubbed any win, no matter how insignificant will make you fell important.
Understandably, for people outside of Wisconsin is isn't as big of a deal. It will mean two less seats in the House of Representatives due to the upcoming leftist gerrymandering here. It also means easier election fraud shenanigans.

For us Wisconsinites, it means quite a bit more, but it is what it is. Life goes on.
 
Understandably, for people outside of Wisconsin is isn't as big of a deal. It will mean two less seats in the House of Representatives due to the upcoming leftist gerrymandering here. It also means easier election fraud shenanigans.

For us Wisconsinites, it means quite a bit more, but it is what it is. Life goes on.
I guess I don't get your drift. Isn't congressional districts done by the state legislature of which there is a solid red majority? Courts don't draw lines do they?
 
I don't care whose dick is bigger... Billionaires donating millions of dollars is still billionaires donating millions of dollars. You just hate Musk doing it because 1) You've been ORDERED to hate EVERYTHING that Musk says or does, and 2) the money was funding a conservative campaign rather than a libtard one.
Ah, your question was “how much did George Soros give,” and I told you, two million

Your “whataboutism” fell flat on its face, but thanks for playing
 
I guess I don't get your drift. Isn't congressional districts done by the state legislature of which there is a solid red majority? Courts don't draw lines do they?
As soon as one party gerrymanders, the other side will take it to court. The SCOTUS said last time they are not going to get involved in State gerrymander cases, ergo, it helps having a majority on the State Court.
 
Musk money could not win this election this time?!!:)

CNN —
Democratic-backed candidate Susan Crawford will win Wisconsin’s Supreme Court race, CNN projects, maintaining the liberal majority on the court in a key battleground state less than three months into President Donald Trump’s second term.

Crawford, a liberal circuit court judge in Dane County, will beat the conservative candidate Brad Schimel, a Waukesha County judge who received Trump’s backing in the final stretch of the campaign. The race was officially nonpartisan, but Crawford’s victory will be seen as a bright spot for Democrats in Wisconsin and nationwide as voters handed the president’s preferred candidate a defeat in the first major political test of the second Trump era.

Crawford and her Democratic allies also worked to turn the election into a referendum on Trump ally Elon Musk, who poured millions of his personal fortune into the race. It quickly became the most expensive judicial contest in US history.

Musk and groups affiliated with him spent more than $19 million in the state, including funding field operations and television advertisements. Crawford tied the tech billionaire directly to Schimel in her appearances, at times referencing Musk at “my opponent.” Democratic groups ran television ads linking the Tesla CEO to Schimel.

In all, the candidates and outside groups spent more than $90 million — shattering spending records set just two years ago, when a liberal judge captured an open seat and flipped control of the court.

Schimel and Republicans had hoped to draw on the network of voters who supported Trump in November’s presidential election, when he narrowly won the battleground state. Schimel hugged Trump closely throughout the campaign and even appeared in a live chat with Musk on his social media site X.

But Democrats bet that seizing on that alignment would pay off with voters at a time when the two men have undertaken a controversial reshaping of the federal government. Issues such as abortion rights and the redistricting of congressional maps also emerged as flashpoints in the campaign.

Crawford, who has represented Planned Parenthood as a private attorney, backs abortion rights.

In a state with divided government — Gov. Tony Evers is a Democrat, and Republicans control the state legislature — the Supreme Court has become the final arbiter on policies that affect Wisconsites’ lives, including whether a 19th-century law that banned most abortions could be enforced today.

And in a state that helps determine who wins the presidency, the high court would have the final word in resolving election disputes.

Since the liberals won a 4-3 majority two years ago, the court has delivered major victories to Democrats — reversing a 2022 high court ruling that had imposed a near-total ban on ballot drop boxes and striking down state legislative maps drawn by Republicans.

The court could revisit congressional maps that have helped the GOP hold a lopsided advantage of six out of eight US House seats, despite the paper-thin margins of victory for Republicans and Democrats in statewide races.

Crawford will serve a 10-year term.(y)


https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/01/politics/wisconsin-supreme-court-election/index.html
....annnnnnnd more mindless chanting.

So less than three months into Trump's 2nd term, things stay the same in Wisconsin. Meh.

Sorry you have to live through that.

No court has authority to write law, dude.
No State court has any authority to interfere with a federal election either.
Now you want to institutionalize election fraud by Democrats.
 
Wisconsin is like San Francisco?
It has many of the same problems as the SDTC, but is not a dictatorship yet.
This was a highly watched race in the country.
Didn't watch it. Didn't bother.
All it means is that Wisconsin is still under the thumb of Democrats.
Musk made it so by pouring more money into the campaign than we've ever seen in this kind of race.

It didn't work. That's a very positive sign.
No, a negative one, since Democrats want to use the State court to institutionalize Democrat election fraud.
 
Understandably, for people outside of Wisconsin is isn't as big of a deal. It will mean two less seats in the House of Representatives due to the upcoming leftist gerrymandering here. It also means easier election fraud shenanigans.

For us Wisconsinites, it means quite a bit more, but it is what it is. Life goes on.
Feel sorry for ya pal. I know you had better hopes than this.
 
I guess I don't get your drift. Isn't congressional districts done by the state legislature of which there is a solid red majority? Courts don't draw lines do they?
You forget. Democrats use illegal means and lawfare to get their way.
You are correct. No court can draw the line of any legislative district.
 
"The Information Age is a historical period that began in the mid-20th century. It is characterized by a rapid shift from traditional industries, as established during the Industrial Revolution, to an economy centered on information technology. The onset of the Information Age has been linked to the development of the transistor in 1947, and the optical amplifier in 1957. These technological advances have had a significant impact on the way information is processed and transmitted." ( Wikipedia; there are numerous other sources.)
Irrelevant appeal to authority. Did that information not exist before this age? What makes it exist now? The label is wrong.
 
I guess I don't get your drift. Isn't congressional districts done by the state legislature of which there is a solid red majority? Courts don't draw lines do they?
Very understandable questions (since you don't live here). Let me just start by saying that Wisconsin is rather weird when it comes to redistricting.

Yes, it is technically our state legislature that creates the districts (or "draws the maps", if you will). However, the snag in the road is that those maps also have to be approved by our Governor (currently "Tyrant Tony" Evers) because it goes through the regular legislative process. Thus, the process (due to having a Democrat "Governor") typically ends up in court and the court effectively decides the maps.

Last time around, we had all sorts of court battles just to keep the maps relatively the same. Then, when our state supreme court switched over to activist control a couple of years ago, they paved the way for Evers to get his way on the maps via a leftist lawsuit. That's why our legislature as of today has a noticeably smaller majority than the almost-supermajority that we had just a few years ago before we lost the court to activists.

Now, they'll legally challenge the maps again and take it even further than last time (as now there's no "least change" rule from the prior conservative(ish) court). This means that our maps will get so leftist gerrymandered that Congressional Districts 1 and 3 will both flip from R to D. It also means that state level maps will get worse to where we could possibly lose the legislature depending on how bad they can manage to gerrymander the lines.
 
Musk money could not win this election this time?!!:)

CNN —
Democratic-backed candidate Susan Crawford will win Wisconsin’s Supreme Court race, CNN projects, maintaining the liberal majority on the court in a key battleground state less than three months into President Donald Trump’s second term.

Crawford, a liberal circuit court judge in Dane County, will beat the conservative candidate Brad Schimel, a Waukesha County judge who received Trump’s backing in the final stretch of the campaign. The race was officially nonpartisan, but Crawford’s victory will be seen as a bright spot for Democrats in Wisconsin and nationwide as voters handed the president’s preferred candidate a defeat in the first major political test of the second Trump era.

Crawford and her Democratic allies also worked to turn the election into a referendum on Trump ally Elon Musk, who poured millions of his personal fortune into the race. It quickly became the most expensive judicial contest in US history.

Musk and groups affiliated with him spent more than $19 million in the state, including funding field operations and television advertisements. Crawford tied the tech billionaire directly to Schimel in her appearances, at times referencing Musk at “my opponent.” Democratic groups ran television ads linking the Tesla CEO to Schimel.

In all, the candidates and outside groups spent more than $90 million — shattering spending records set just two years ago, when a liberal judge captured an open seat and flipped control of the court.

Schimel and Republicans had hoped to draw on the network of voters who supported Trump in November’s presidential election, when he narrowly won the battleground state. Schimel hugged Trump closely throughout the campaign and even appeared in a live chat with Musk on his social media site X.

But Democrats bet that seizing on that alignment would pay off with voters at a time when the two men have undertaken a controversial reshaping of the federal government. Issues such as abortion rights and the redistricting of congressional maps also emerged as flashpoints in the campaign.

Crawford, who has represented Planned Parenthood as a private attorney, backs abortion rights.

In a state with divided government — Gov. Tony Evers is a Democrat, and Republicans control the state legislature — the Supreme Court has become the final arbiter on policies that affect Wisconsites’ lives, including whether a 19th-century law that banned most abortions could be enforced today.

And in a state that helps determine who wins the presidency, the high court would have the final word in resolving election disputes.

Since the liberals won a 4-3 majority two years ago, the court has delivered major victories to Democrats — reversing a 2022 high court ruling that had imposed a near-total ban on ballot drop boxes and striking down state legislative maps drawn by Republicans.

The court could revisit congressional maps that have helped the GOP hold a lopsided advantage of six out of eight US House seats, despite the paper-thin margins of victory for Republicans and Democrats in statewide races.

Crawford will serve a 10-year term.(y)


https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/01/politics/wisconsin-supreme-court-election/index.html
Hahahahha, 25 million+ by Musk, all to flop on his face
 


Bill Mitchell

@mitchellvii
Subscribe


DON'T BLACK-PILL OVER THIS FOLKS:1. This was a liberal replacing a liberal.
2. The 4-3 liberal court is still 4-3 as it has been for 2 years.
3. Trump gets people to turn out no one else can.
4. Schimel ain't Trump.
5. Voter ID won BIG which is huge.
6. 2026 is forever away in political time.
Many things will positively affect the midterms between now and then that will be MUCH more important than this.


9:17 PM · Apr 1, 2025
·
208.7K

Views
"voter ID won BIG which is huge"
Bitch, Wisconsin has had Voter ID since fucking 2011. FOURTEEN FUCKING YEARS
 
Back
Top