"Lipstick on a pig" McCain

RStringfield said:
Another thing about this ad is that it shows that the Repubs want to continue the focus on Palin. McCain is boring and a lousy candidate. The Repubs want to make this about Obama vs Palin.
Click to expand...

It will be fun to watch when they split up to cover more events.

McSame will be standing in empty halls.
 
Mcain will have buses go to some old folks home are roll them in.
Is it to make him look under 90 or becuase no one shows up.
 
cawacko said:
Darla, look at the lies and misinformation left-wing folk are putting out about Sarah Palin. They send 30 lawyers to Alaska to do research on her for what? Democrats are not victims here and they are playing the same game.
Click to expand...

ummm maybe b/c we don't know a damn thing about her.
 
RStringfield said:
Yeah, Obama is talking about issues like McCain's "definition" of middle class as those making under 5 million.

You think McCain is slime because of partisanship, not because of dirty politics. Just about everybody is guilty of dirty politics.
Click to expand...

No, I think he's slime because he's slime, he's running a slime campaign, and Obama isn't, he's not talking about issues, and Obama is. You don't want to see it because you're too invested in your own partisanship. Libertarians are not immune to being partisan, they just pretend that they are. Their partisanship lies in their deep faith-based belief that both parties are exactly alike, and they are different.
 
Darla said:
No, I think he's slime because he's slime, he's running a slime campaign, and Obama isn't, he's not talking about issues, and Obama is. You don't want to see it because you're too invested in your own partisanship. Libertarians are not immune to being partisan, they just pretend that they are. Their partisanship lies in their deep faith-based belief that both parties are exactly alike, and they are different.
Click to expand...

I gave you an example of Obama "talking about issues" that was fairly slimy and clearly took McCain out of context. Or the commercials about how many houses McCain has. Who gives a fuck? Now I am sure you will spin that into being a valid discussion of the issues, because you are a partisan hack, but it is not a valid discussion of the issues.

No, Libertarians are not immune from partisanship. But you won't hear me promoting Barr/Root because they suck. I will admit I displayed some with Paul, though.
 
Last edited:
RStringfield said:
I gave you an example of Obama "talking about issues" that was fairly slimy and clearly took McCain out of context. Or the commercials about how many houses McCain has. Who gives a ***? Now I am sure you will spin that into being a valid discussion of the issues, because you are a partisan hack, but it is not a valid discussion of the issues.

No, Libertarians are not immune from partisanship. But you won't hear me promoting Barr/Root because they suck. I will admit I displayed some with Paul, though.
Click to expand...

And what example was that?

For the record, you are a complete Ron Paul hack.
 
RStringfield said:
I gave you an example of Obama "talking about issues" that was fairly slimy and clearly took McCain out of context. Or the commercials about how many houses McCain has. Who gives a fuck? Now I am sure you will spin that into being a valid discussion of the issues, because you are a partisan hack, but it is not a valid discussion of the issues.

No, Libertarians are not immune from partisanship. But you won't hear me promoting Barr/Root because they suck. I will admit I displayed some with Paul, though.
Click to expand...

Yeah, right, that was real slimey! As far as having 8 houses and not even knowing it, you bet that's an issue, especially in this economy.

Republicans love you because you give them cover for voting for the biggest slimes to ever walk the earth - the modern day republican party.

It is your own blinders that wont' allow you to admit it. But you only fool those who so badly want to be fooled
 
Darla said:
The only pig in this race is Old Man McCain himself. This reminds me so much of this scene in Angel (the tv series), where they are put in charge of an evil law firm, Wolfram & Hart, and they get this client who is a woman senator. She comes in because she is being challenged by a young guy, and she wants them to turn put a spell on him to cause him to believe he is a pedophile and to publically confess to it. And she says that he is polling good with the chicks, and “I had the chicks, the chick vote was mine”, and she is just pure evil.

And that is what this entire campaign reminds me of. Pure evil disguised as the chick-friendly candidate.

Old man mccain has always been a dirty old man, and he started out as a dirty young man. With his rape jokes, and his serial fucking around, and his jokes about young girls, that's all he has ever been.

He picked Palin because his dick got hard, or at least, moved (let's face it at his age, and in his condition, if it moves it's like, an epic event), and he thought that the dicks of a lot of other old men might get hard or move too.

For an example, take a look at Dixie's posts. His dick hasn't gone down since he got the news.

Excuse my bluntness, but let's at least put the cards down on the table, one time. We're talking about hard dicks here. It needs to be said and not just implied like Limbaugh does when he says "we've got a babbbbbbbbe on the ticket folks". Let's just spell it out.

In the meantime, the planet contiues to careen towards crisis level. Actually, when I think about it, it really comes as no surprise to me that hard dicks will end up dooming the planet. It really doesn't.
Click to expand...

Wow you're really starting to flip about about this. Do we need a suicide watch for you liberals?
 
RStringfield said:
Middle class as those making under 5 million a year. Pay attention.
Click to expand...

OK, then its like I initially thought. You didn't give example of Obama being slimy in his talking points. You just seem to be deluded enough to think that you did.
 
Darla said:
Yeah, right, that was real slimey!
Click to expand...

Yes, it was slimy.

Darla said:
As far as having 8 houses and not even knowing it, you bet that's an issue, especially in this economy.
Click to expand...

As I predicted. It has shit do with the economic problems this country faces.

Darla said:
Republicans love you because you give them cover for voting for the biggest slimes to ever walk the earth - the modern day republican party.

It is your own blinders that wont' allow you to admit it. But you only fool those who so badly want to be fooled
Click to expand...

You are the one being fooled. I have spent most of my time, this election, bashing the Repubs. For which I am called a socialist, liberial (sic) and other such nonsense. IMO, anybody that votes for McCain is a complete idiot of either the partisan or big government warmonger varieties. But statists can't accept the fact that some people do not like either major party.

I won't be voting for Obama (unless he suddenly grows a backbone) but I still hope he wins out over McCain.
 
RStringfield said:
It was slimy. He clearly took McCain out of context just as Repubs are trying to do with Obama on this lipstick nonsense.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/factchecking_obama.html
Click to expand...

If you would like another example there's McCain comment about leaving troops in Iraq for 100 years if no one is getting hurt. Obama said McCain wants to fight the war in Iraq for up to 100 years. Well no, that's not what McCain said.

Two wrongs don't make a right and unfortunately both campaigns engage in these tactics.
 
RStringfield said:
I won't be voting for Obama (unless he suddenly grows a backbone) but I still hope he wins out over McCain.
Click to expand...

So the Dems can have a majority and veto proof system so they can pass all their social programs? At least with McCain you'll get some gridlock and hopefully nothing gets done..
 
cawacko said:
If you would like another example there's McCain comment about leaving troops in Iraq for 100 years if no one is getting hurt. Obama said McCain wants to fight the war in Iraq for up to 100 years. Well no, that's not what McCain said.

Two wrongs don't make a right and unfortunately both campaigns engage in these tactics.
Click to expand...

I find McCain's full statement terrible.
 
Obfuscate said:
So the Dems can have a majority and veto proof system so they can pass all their social programs? At least with McCain you'll get some gridlock and hopefully nothing gets done..
Click to expand...

I doubt it. McCain campaigns on reaching across the aisle and he has a long record of supporting big government. Besides, President's don't need congress to bring about big government messes.

Obama is no true believer in big government fixes. I am sure he will support quite a bit of government growth, but he has shown that he is open to empirical evidence and that does no favors to government fixes.

http://www.reason.com/news/show/128356.html
http://www.reason.com/news/show/118937.html
 
RStringfield said:
Yeah, Obama is talking about issues like McCain's "definition" of middle class as those making under 5 million.

You think McCain is slime because of partisanship, not because of dirty politics. Just about everybody is guilty of dirty politics.
Click to expand...

you forgot to mention the ever critical issue of how many homes McCain owns.... Obama is all for talking about that as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top