Majority of Republicans Already Say They Can’t Lose in 2024 Unless the Vote Is Rigged

I'm not weasel wording anything.
Courts simply cannot certify any election. They can't even decertify an election.

Courts can certainly fail to give serious charges credence. By choosing to not hear the case, there is no trial, no opportunity to present any evidence, ...nothing.

What courts CAN do is bring criminal charges to those defrauding the election (if the prosecutor chooses to do so, of course). Unfortunately, too many prosecutors are Soros backed and just as corrupt as hell. Too many judges are also Soros backed and just as corrupt as hell.

but there are legal decisions to be made regarding elections.

election fraud is a crime which can be punished in the legal system.

judges are corrupt ass maggots.

im sorry to be the one to have to tell these troubling things.
 
but there are legal decisions to be made regarding elections.

election fraud is a crime which can be punished in the legal system.

judges are corrupt ass maggots.

im sorry to be the one to have to tell these troubling things.

Yes. Election fraud is a crime. To prosecute an election defrauder though, you must:

1) Find the bastard. While there is plenty of evidence of election fraud, putting them to names is the hard part.
2) Get a prosecutor that isn't corrupt. Kinda hard to find these days.
3) File a criminal case in a court where the judge isn't corrupt, and make it a jury trial, so the judge's influence is minimized.

It is also best to conduct the trial as sanitary as possible, so no appeal will be heard, and to make it difficult for the Democrats to politicize it.
 
justice requires non-corrupt judges. we don't always have that.


often personnel is corrupt.

Collecting evidence does not require judges at all. If there are millions of cases of voter fraud, you should have no problem collecting a few hundred of them.

The next step would require judges, but more judges were appointed by Republicans than Democrats. The next step would be to present that in court. The Republican judges have begged for someone to find some evidence...

And so we return to why have Republicans failed to find any evidence in 3 years?
 
Collecting evidence does not require judges at all. If there are millions of cases of voter fraud, you should have no problem collecting a few hundred of them.

The next step would require judges, but more judges were appointed by Republicans than Democrats. The next step would be to present that in court. The Republican judges have begged for someone to find some evidence...

And so we return to why have Republicans failed to find any evidence in 3 years?

judges dismissed all kinds of evidence.

they didnt seriously consider anything.

they're corrupt.
 
Collecting evidence does not require judges at all. If there are millions of cases of voter fraud, you should have no problem collecting a few hundred of them.

The next step would require judges, but more judges were appointed by Republicans than Democrats. The next step would be to present that in court. The Republican judges have begged for someone to find some evidence...

And so we return to why have Republicans failed to find any evidence in 3 years?

Argument of the Stone fallacy. I have already shown you some of the evidence of election fraud by Democrats. You can't just make it disappear. You can't just make people's judgement of that evidence just disappear either.
 
On a real point, trump has never been able to tie a tie. That is just bizarre to me.

Illiteracy: Proper nouns are always capitalized.

Trump has no problem tying a tie.

Biden doesn't know where he is, what he is doing, where he is going, or even what year it is.
 
judges dismissed all kinds of evidence.

they didnt seriously consider anything.

they're corrupt.

You are claiming that all the judges(Republicans and Democrats) would dismiss your evidence, which is why you have no evidence? Unlikely, but more importantly, wouldn't you have the evidence anyway?
 
You are claiming that all the judges(Republicans and Democrats) would dismiss your evidence, which is why you have no evidence? Unlikely, but more importantly, wouldn't you have the evidence anyway?

Go to court much Walt? He ain't too far from the truth.
 
You are claiming that all the judges(Republicans and Democrats) would dismiss your evidence, which is why you have no evidence? Unlikely, but more importantly, wouldn't you have the evidence anyway?

Some of it has already been shown to you.
 
In fact, it was a fair and honest election. Trump proved that himself. He asked for and got more recounts than anyone ever had before. They proved the vote was correct.
Then he went to court over 60 times and lost them all because he had NO PROOF of election fraud. His cases were tossed because he had nothing.
Look what lying about the election cost Fox? Only about a billion dollars.
The secretaries of state that Trump accosted to change the elections informed him simply and clearly the elections were clean.
You have to be a real blind ass Trumpy to not understand that.
Trump lost a fair and honest election. You goofball rightys should have been part of Dominion's s.suit.
 
Back
Top