McCain , the savings and loan failure and the keating five

Superfreak said:
That is quite comical.
Click to expand...


If you really question wether the Dems tear each other appart much more often then R's you know nothing about politics.


Look how fricking quik the right lined up under McSame after repeteedly attacking him over the last decade at least.
 
Desh said:
The right brings them up all the time along with the Obama having gone to a muslim school 40 some years ago.
Click to expand...

Anyone who brings up Whitewater or Billy lying and acts as though they are relevant is an idiot.

The Obama going to a muslim school is factual, but also not really relevant to who he is today.

The Keating five crap is not relevant because McCain was found to have done nothing wrong other than use poor judgement. Which from his actions since the event show that he has learned from that poor judgement.
 
Desh said:
If you really question wether the Dems tear each other appart much more often then R's you know nothing about politics.


Look how fricking quik the right lined up under McSame after repeteedly attacking him over the last decade at least.
Click to expand...

and the Dems won't line up behind Obama once Hillary is officially out?

Who is the right supposed to line up behind? Obama? Hillary?

You THINK the Dems "tear each other apart" more because you are severely blinded by your own partisanship. Ted Kennedy is still a Dem Senator.... so don't pretend they are oh so quick to kick out the corrupt.
 
Superfreak said:
Anyone who brings up Whitewater or Billy lying and acts as though they are relevant is an idiot.

The Obama going to a muslim school is factual, but also not really relevant to who he is today.

The Keating five crap is not relevant because McCain was found to have done nothing wrong other than use poor judgement. Which from his actions since the event show that he has learned from that poor judgement.
Click to expand...


Poor judgement and helping a guy who gave him money by intervening on his behalf with investigators?

He was helping the people who gave us teh savings and loans scadal and cost this country lots of tax dollars in a bail out. Now he has put on his top advisor pannel the guy who wrote GLB act which deregulated the banks yet again and caused more pain.

The guy picks time and time again the wrong people to be involved with.
 
Desh said:
Why should they not.

I dont recall any dems saying Obama is a traitor?
Click to expand...

Why should they not be relevant?

Whitewater... because Bill isn't running and Hillary is done, she just hasn't accepted it yet.

Bill Lying.... because Billy isn't running

Keating 5.... because if you have an "issue" where the person was found to have done nothing wrong... then it is not an "issue"

Not sure where you are going with the Dems saying Obama is a traitor.
 
Desh said:
Poor judgement and helping a guy who gave him money by intervening on his behalf with investigators?

He was helping the people who gave us teh savings and loans scadal and cost this country lots of tax dollars in a bail out. Now he has put on his top advisor pannel the guy who wrote GLB act which deregulated the banks yet again and caused more pain.

The guy picks time and time again the wrong people to be involved with.
Click to expand...

1) Again, other than poor judgement he did nothing wrong AND he has since fought for campaign finance reform.

2) I am not going to get into your whole "the GLB bill was the sole reason banks deregulated and caused this mess".

3) I really don't think that you want to talk about association as a determining factor.... especially if you are for Obama.
 
uscitizen said:
Dems have more loyalty to their party and do tend to embrace corrupt ones more than Republicans do.

but then the demoncrats in congress are becoming more republicanized all the time. The result of corporate interests buying our government.

Seems like McSames campaign reform bill made that a bit easier too.
that combined with rescinding the fairness doctrine.
Click to expand...


:shock:
 
Desh said:
If you really question wether the Dems tear each other appart much more often then R's you know nothing about politics.


Look how fricking quik the right lined up under McSame after repeteedly attacking him over the last decade at least.
Click to expand...

Interestingly enough Desh you yourself have posted articles about how the right has not lined up behind McCain and how he's having trouble bring the RR into his camp.

Notice how quick you jumped into Obama's camp after your prefered candidate John Edwards lost.
 
Hmm the dems are at least having an actual primary race and did just not drop their drawers and line up in front of Hillary. Like the repubs did for McSame.

Does this not verify what I posted SF ?
 
it says a lot about his morals, stepping in for the Keating and taking the CASHHHHHHH.
I just don't want to hear morals and ethics from Mcfossil. He should man up and lose on the issue's alone.
 
uscitizen said:
Hmm the dems are at least having an actual primary race and did just not drop their drawers and line up in front of Hillary. Like the repubs did for McSame.

Does this not verify what I posted SF ?
Click to expand...

What do you call what the Republicans did? If you went by polls Rudy would have been the nominee. Dude got his ass kicked. Why are you complaining about it?
 
uscitizen said:
Hmm the dems are at least having an actual primary race and did just not drop their drawers and line up in front of Hillary. Like the repubs did for McSame.

Does this not verify what I posted SF ?
Click to expand...

So your contention is that Huckabee didn't stay in until he was mathematically eliminated?

Just because McCain locked up the necessary delegates faster doesn't mean the Reps didn't have a race. The only thing you "verified" is that you can be just as ignorant on this topic as you have been on many others recently.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top