Monica Lewinsky Asks Bill Clinton....

[PostmodernProphet]

An indictment is an accusation of a criminal act. Being overturned does not mean a person was not indicted for a criminal act, only that some error was made in the process (the juror did not live in the county). .

being overturned merely means the prosecutor was a fuckwit and was wrong about crime being committed......

 

[Flash]

A law is not a crime, Sock. Trump is authorized to retain any document he wishes. He has not violated any part of Title 18.
You are describing Biden. You cannot try Trump for Biden's violation of federal law.

A law defines a crime. Trump has been indicted for 91 crimes. The trials will determine if he is guilty or not guilty. You don't have knowledge to determine if he can retain any document he wishes, especially after those documents were subpoenaed and he refused to return them. Biden has nothing to do with this case--an attempt at diversion on your part.

 

[Flash]

It's a sham, Sock.

Apparently they do if that someone is Trump.

Trump has never lost an election.

Trump has not committed any crime.

You cannot make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear, Sock. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Nothing but more wild stories invented by the Trump supporters to add to their other lies.

 

[Into the Night]

An indictment is an accusation of a criminal act. Being overturned does not mean a person was not indicted for a criminal act, only that some error was made in the process (the juror did not live in the county).

We know all accusations are not true--like voter fraud, etc. That is the purpose of the trial. Bult the person who was found not guilty was still indicted for a criminal act. If not, what is an example of an indictment that is not a criminal act.

I provided the example of a criminal act as you asked. Your turn.

You did not provide any example of a criminal act. You posted a law. A law is not a criminal act.
You cannot make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear, Sock. I have already shown some of it to you. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Son, you look cray-cray when you repeat yourself like Rain Man.

Who is 'Rain Man', Sybil? Another one of your imaginary friends?

 

[Flash]

You did not provide any example of a criminal act. You posted a law. A law is not a criminal act.
You cannot make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear, Sock. I have already shown some of it to you. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

A law describes a criminal act. Learn how the law works.

We are still waiting for any evidence of election fraud. You never proved anything.

I'll now settle for one precinct (rather than county) that had more votes than registered voters. You can't make up lies and call those evidence and expect anybody to believe you other than Trump supporters.

 

[Into the Night]

A law defines a crime.

A law is not a crime, Sock.

Trump has been indicted for 91 crimes.

No crimes listed.

The trials will determine if he is guilty or not guilty.

Guilty of what?

You don't have knowledge to determine if he can retain any document he wishes,

The law, Sock. The law.

especially after those documents were subpoenaed

Congress does not have authority to subpoena.

and he refused to return them.

Trump does not have to return them.

Biden has nothing to do with this case--an attempt at diversion on your part.

Biden stole confidential and secret documents. He was never authorized to have them. He had them for YEARS. He exposed them to agents from China and Ukraine. That's espionage, Sock. That's an act of treason.

You cannot blame Trump for Biden's violations of federal law.

The trial in New York is not talking about federal documents, Sock.
The court of New York has no jurisdiction over federal law, Sock.

 

[Flash]

The law, Sock. The law.

Congress does not have authority to subpoena.

The subpoena was issued by the DOJ. Trump's lawyer warned him if he did not return the documents it would be a crime.

Cite the provision in the law that says Trump does not have to return those documents. I won't hold my breath.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

PLEASE CALL ME CRAY-CRAY
MOMMY CALLED ME LIL’ CRAY-CRAY
I’VE GROWN USED TO IT​

I can see why, Cray-Cray.

 

[Into the Night]

The subpoena was issued by the DOJ. Trump's lawyer warned him if he did not return the documents it would be a crime.

Cite the provision in the law that says Trump does not have to return those documents. I won't hold my breath.

Word stuffing. Trump does not have to return any document. RQAA.

 

[Flash]

Word stuffing. Trump does not have to return any document. RQAA.

Then it shouldn't be difficult to cite the provision in the law that says that.

RQAA="I don't have any idea so I'll just pretend I already answered that question."

 

[Into the Night]

Then it shouldn't be difficult to cite the provision in the law that says that.

RQAA. Stop asking the same question over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over, Sock. It's already been answered.

 

[Flash]

RQAA. Stop asking the same question over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over, Sock. It's already been answered.

You never cited the provision the first time.

You should stop using RQAA over and over, lying to people about the 2020 election not taking place over and over, election fraud over and over, January 6 rioters over and over, silly fallacies over and over.

 

[Into the Night]

You never cited the provision the first time.

Blatant lie. RQAA.

You should stop using RQAA over and over,

Stop asking the same question over and over. It's already been answered. You are being mindless.

lying to people about the 2020 election not taking place over and over,

Not a lie, Sock. You cannot make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear.

election fraud over and over,

You cannot make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear, Sock. I've already shown some of it to you. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

January 6 rioters over and over,

You cannot make the evidence of Democrats coordinating and supporting the riots in cities across America or on Jan 6th just disappear either, Sock. Some of that has also been shown to you. Argument of the Stone fallacy.

silly fallacies over and over.

They are YOUR fallacies, Sock. You cannot blame me for YOUR problem. Inversion fallacy.

 

[Port Tack]

What crime, Sock?

You really should try and keep up.

 

[Port Tack]

It is in English. The law he is quoting concerns someone holding document without authorization, the way Biden did. Trump has authorization. Biden did not.
It has nothing to do with this court case at all, nor any hush money, nor any fraud. Indeed, the court in New York has no jurisdiction to prosecute federal law, which is what he is quoting.

In other words, he is listing a 'crime' that is not even on the indictment.

Biden did nothing wrong or they would have prosecuted him.

 

[Port Tack]

A law is not a crime, Sock.

No crimes listed.

Guilty of what?

The law, Sock. The law.

Congress does not have authority to subpoena.

Trump does not have to return them.

Biden stole confidential and secret documents. He was never authorized to have them. He had them for YEARS. He exposed them to agents from China and Ukraine. That's espionage, Sock. That's an act of treason.

You cannot blame Trump for Biden's violations of federal law.

The trial in New York is not talking about federal documents, Sock.
The court of New York has no jurisdiction over federal law, Sock.

Biden broke no law or he would have been prosecuted.

 

[Port Tack]

Word stuffing. Trump does not have to return any document. RQAA.

Is that because the FBI that searched his place took them all?

 

[Port Tack]

Biden stole confidential and secret documents. He was never authorized to have them. He had them for YEARS. He exposed them to agents from China and Ukraine. That's espionage, Sock. That's an act of treason.

Biden did not break any law. there was no law broken or they would have conveiened a grand jury like they did with Trump.

You cannot blame Trump for Biden's violations of federal law.

what law, Biden broke no law.

The trial in New York is not talking about federal documents, Sock.
The court of New York has no jurisdiction over federal law, Sock.

NY has jurisdiction over trumps crimes or they would not be trying him now.

 

[Port Tack]

You did not provide any example of a criminal act.

The prosecution explained it pretty well today in court while your fuhrer sat looking like a worn out old man. you should try and check the news.

You can now read daily transcripts of the Trump trial, here’s how
https://thehill.com/homenews/nexsta...ily-transcripts-of-the-trump-trial-heres-how/

Better hurry though, it could be over before you know it!

First Witness in Trump’s Hush Money Trial Could Wreck His Whole Case
https://newrepublic.com/post/180870/first-witness-trump-hush-money-trial-david-pecker

Nobody gives a flying fuck what you think, this is who matters.

Two-thirds of registered voters say Trump’s hush money charges are serious
https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/two-thirds-registered-voters-say-trumps-hush-money-charges-are-serious

Among Republicans as a whole, 24% say they would not vote for Trump if he was convicted of a felony crime by a jury, and 37% say they would not vote for him if he was serving time in prison at the time of the election.