PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
18 U. S. C. [FONT="]§ [/FONT]793 (e)
describes no action Trump committed......sorry......
18 U. S. C. [FONT="]§ [/FONT]793 (e)
describes no action Trump committed......sorry......
The court will figure it out. What's the worry?
Good. You seemed to be shitting all over your trident and tail.I'm not worried....
I'm just pointing out the lies from our lib'rul posters.......its sort of what happens around here.....you lie, I point......
in other words you want to ignore the fact every indictment is nothing but a political sham......
remind me how many of the sandwiches indicted by Bragg have had their cases reversed by appeals courts.......It is not a sham when a grand jury indicts you for a felony.
You still ignored the entire issue that a felony indictment by definition is an indictment for a criminal act. You can't just indict someone for nothing.
Trump can never lose and election or commit a crime because his supporters believe the election and criminal charges were all negligent with no evidence.
Good. You seemed to be shitting all over your trident and tail.
You don't believe Trump is actually on trial in NY? Interesting.
^^^and you seem to have posted your 130,000th lie.......not interesting.....
remind me how many of the sandwiches indicted by Bragg have had their cases reversed by appeals courts.......
dude, an indictment is nothing higher than an accusation.....Bragg has been oiverturned consistently......so has Smith.....Fanni hasn't been a DA long enough to have a record.....That does not alter the fact that an indictment has to be for a criminal act.
In other words, you have not bothered to read any of the indictments. All the indictments are criminal acts with the corresponding criminal statute listed. Indictments, by definition, are accusing the defendant of a criminal act.
18 U. S. C. [FONT="]§ [/FONT]793 (e)
Try putting that in English.
dude, an indictment is nothing higher than an accusation.....Bragg has been oiverturned consistently......so has Smith.....Fanni hasn't been a DA long enough to have a record.....
United States Code Section 793.
This is one of the criminal statutes on which one of the 91 indictments is based. You said none of the indictments are crimes, but this is one of the crimes. Criminal indictments only exist when they are indicting a person for a crime.
Do a search for this section and read the crimes it covers.
The court will figure it out. What's the worry?
Good. You seemed to be shitting all over your trident and tail.
You don't believe Trump is actually on trial in NY? Interesting.
Figure what out, Sybil? Persecution is itself illegal.
Son, you look cray-cray when you repeat yourself like Rain Man.Persecution is itself illegal, Sybil.
It's a sham, Sock.It is not a sham when a grand jury indicts you for a felony.
Apparently they do if that someone is Trump.You still ignored the entire issue that a felony indictment by definition is an indictment for a criminal act. You can't just indict someone for nothing.
Trump has never lost an election.Trump can never lose and election
Trump has not committed any crime.or commit a crime
You cannot make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear, Sock. Argument of the Stone fallacy.because his supporters believe the election and criminal charges were all negligent with no evidence.
^^^
Follows the Father of Lies, calls others the liars.
Pmp, you find it interesting enough to respond. Jus' sayin'.