C
Cancel3
Guest
lets say they all are recreational. the republican NAZI like policy put them there for the perpetuation of power and racism.
Now that I can agree with.
lets say they all are recreational. the republican NAZI like policy put them there for the perpetuation of power and racism.
Ahem, excuse me, but Republicans are not solely responsible for pot being illegal. I know you want to just blame the fuck out of them for every damn thing you can come up with, but pot being illegal is the result of totally bipartisan effort.
More difficult than MJ.Beer is hard for teens to get ?
The war on drugs was started by Ronald Reagan. Sure pot was illegal before that, but it did not carry the same enforcement or punishment as it does now. Do you realize here in Florida conviction for any amount of pot requires a mandentory two year drivers liscense suspension.
Ok, then lets call it a Bipartisan Nazi like policy.
Is that better?
Although, the conservatives out there are far more likely to fight the legalizations of marijuana.
Just like the conservatives would be more likely to try and legislate a medical procedure they dislike. You have only to look at Terri Schiavo's plight to see that.
1937 -- Marijuana Tax Act --Signed by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
This effectively outlawed marijuana on a federal level.
As for the laws of today, I have already stated my position, did you not read my posts? I think the laws are absurd and pot should be decriminalized. So, I can't argue with you about that, but to just outright lie about why pot is illegal in the first place, and to blame it on "Nazi Republicans" is absurd, and I can't allow it to stand. It was actually a "Nazi Democrat" who made it illegal.
I'll fight the "legalization" of pot, based on the fact that smoking is bad for your health. I support "decriminalization" of pot, based on the fact that people should be able to grow and possess a fucking weed, and that shouldn't be a felony.
I'll fight the "legalization" of pot, based on the fact that smoking is bad for your health. I support "decriminalization" of pot, based on the fact that people should be able to grow and possess a fucking weed, and that shouldn't be a felony.
lets say they all are recreational. the republican NAZI like policy put them there for the perpetuation of power and racism.
Where and how did I lie about who made it illegal in the first place?
So the grand federal government should make anything that is bad for your health illegal?
Somehow that doesn't sound like a very conservative mindset. What happened to less government interference?
You want to keep it illegal because its bad for your health? So we are going to outlaw red meat, sugar, tobacco, fast food, and the long list of other things that are bad for your health?
OK lets see what the hitler youth republicans say after the role call vote on HR5843.
Well, we have a democrat majority, should pass with flying colors, right?
You're twisting my position. A familiar tactic for you, but very dishonest.
Our government should NEVER make something legal that is BAD for public health! It actually defies the fundamental purpose and principle of a federal government to do that. This is quite different from making things illegal that are bad for public health. In some cases, the government certainly has an obligation to act, such as drunk driving... bad for public health... should be illegal... heroin and opium... bad for public health... should be illegal... pot, should not be legalized, but should be decriminalized. Red meat and tobacco... already legal, shouldn't be made criminal.
My best guess is that Reid is not the only wussy democrat, therefore it'll get some votes but won't pass.
More dems will vote yes but that's little consolation for ending the continued retardation of our government