"No such law exists"

What would it prove? Nothing. All that matters is what is proved in court. I'd wager on it, but Trumpers hate making bets on Trump. LOL

Tinker is a liar and troll so no one should feel any obligation to provide anything she asks for.

The same Presidential Records Act information has been quoted at least 10 times to her, she ignores it when quoted and then just repeats the same lies later pretending she has never read the quoted facts.

So when i am quoting anything or providing it, it is not to Tinker but to counter the lies for others reading, so they can get the proper information.
 
Trump was chided by legal experts over the weekend for seemingly making up legislation that he stated had authorized him to take national security documents home to his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.

"Nope. No such law exists. Period." wrote longtime Harvard legal scholar Laurence Tribe.
Yes, there is such a law and it is the highest law of the land. It's called the Constitution of the United States. Of course, you have no idea what I'm talking about, and that's because the problem of your confusion is on your end.

He had no right to possess them.
Yep, he had every right to posess them, and once again, you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about because you are a totally uneducated fuck who forms violent opinions from his most profound ignorance.

Read the Constitution, although I know that you find that it burns your eyes. Nobody has the power to remove the (ex)President's authority.

No law says the President can steal documents.
When I read this I thought "What a fucking stupid comment" and then I looked up and noticed that it was your comment, so order was once again restored to the universe.

It's not theft if what Trump had were Executive Branch documents. Were they Executive Branch documents, BidenPresident? If they were, Trump can have them. Were they Executive Branch documents?

You are a fucking brainless twit.

Trump is not the king. News to you?!
Yes, you are an extremely stupid twit. News to you?

His fans will continue to swallow whatever Trump is drizzling down their throats. Sad.
You will continue to swallow whatever Spanky drizzles down your throat. Funny!

terry-spanky.gif


Just false. Not worth continuing.
Good. Fleeing from the discussion was the first intelligent thing you have done in this thread. Of course, you probably should have done so before you ever posted anything, but better late than never.
 
The same Presidential Records Act information has been quoted at least 10 times to her, she ignores it when quoted and then just repeats the same lies later pretending she has never read the quoted facts.
Three things:

1. You are a moron.
2. Every single time you quote the Presidential Records Act, you do so out of context and effectively lie. There is no law that Congress can pass that removes any of the Executive power bestown upon the (ex)President per the Constitution. You have been told this like 10 times, but you ignore it and then just keep repeating the same lies pretending that no one ever said anything.
3. You are an idiot and a liar.
 
You will continue to swallow whatever Spanky drizzles down your throat. Funny!

I love it when you prove you read all of my posts by stealing my lines. :laugh:

It's one reason why I like to sprinkle key words and phrases in posts to see if they are turned. Thanks for returning it. :)
 
Three things:

1. You are a moron.
2. Every single time you quote the Presidential Records Act, you do so out of context and effectively lie. There is no law that Congress can pass that removes any of the Executive power bestown upon the (ex)President per the Constitution. You have been told this like 10 times, but you ignore it and then just keep repeating the same lies pretending that no one ever said anything.
3. You are an idiot and a liar.

Your stupidity is showing here.

I don't care what you 'tell' me when you do not do what i do, which is cite facts. I QUOTE the PRA, and do not add any context in those quotes. It is just the facts of what it says.

And i don't GAF how many times you "tell" me something when you are wrong and won't quote anything. Saying stupid and wrong things over and over does not make it right no matter what Trump says. If you want to make the case that the Constitution gave Trump the power to do what he did, then QUOTE the relevant part. Yo just stating it, when you are stupid is meaningless.
 
Your stupidity is showing here.

I don't care what you 'tell' me when you do not do what i do, which is cite facts. I QUOTE the PRA, and do not add any context in those quotes. It is just the facts of what it says.

And i don't GAF how many times you "tell" me something when you are wrong and won't quote anything. Saying stupid and wrong things over and over does not make it right no matter what Trump says. If you want to make the case that the Constitution gave Trump the power to do what he did, then QUOTE the relevant part. Yo just stating it, when you are stupid is meaningless.

Smart, emotionally stable people learn to avoid being baited by trolls, especially the mentally ill ones. Jus' sayin'. :)
 
200w.webp
200w.webp
200w.webp

I don't care what you 'tell' me
I realize this. You don't care how much information to the contrary is presented, you can't break from your delusion. You can't shake your TDS. You can't be rational to save your life. It doesn't matter what the Constitution reads, or that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. You don't care. You hate Trump, you are too stupid to learn, you suffer from TDS and delusion disorder and your thought-masters demand that you OBEY without question.

I get it. You don't care.

which is cite facts.
... and you don't even know what the word "facts" means. What you cite are errors and your own misinformation, and as I mentioned above, you don't care how helpful anyone tries to be, you are completely dominated by your TDS. What you gibber and babble is completely erroneous. You could read the Constitution and go with what it reads, but you have been ordered to stay clear of that document lest it "confuse" you.

I QUOTE the PRA, ...
... and not the Constitution. I notice that the PRA completely omits any mention of "Article II. Section 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America." ... and this is where you blurt out "That doesn't mean anything!" Just a sidenote, when you cite dishonest, TDS-infested disinformation, you chop your argument off at the knees right at the starting line.

And i don't GAF how many times you "tell" me something
Yes, yes, we've already been over this, but I included that sentence because it was what you wrote to Tinkerpeach, almost a word-for-word direct copy, implying that your having sufficiently repeated some misinformation makes Tinkerpeach in the wrong for not having accepted it. You're a moron.

If you want to make the case that the Constitution gave Trump the power to do what he did, then QUOTE the relevant part.
Really? The Constitution is not a long read. The President's authorizations are wrapped up in Article II. In fact, I'll post Article II for you right here:

Article II. Section 1.
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.

The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.

The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

Section. 2.
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.

Section. 3.
He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

Section. 4.
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

So just read it. That which doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Contrary to what your thought-masters have told you, reading the Constitution will not kill you, nor will practicing its principles.

f424e832c62617becd1beac0dbb59b08.jpg
 
I realize this. You don't care how much information to the contrary is presented, you can't break from your delusion. You can't shake your TDS. You can't be rational to save your life. It doesn't matter what the Constitution reads, or that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. You don't care. You hate Trump, you are too stupid to learn, you suffer from TDS and delusion disorder and your thought-masters demand that you OBEY without question.

I get it. You don't care.


... and you don't even know what the word "facts" means. What you cite are errors and your own misinformation, and as I mentioned above, you don't care how helpful anyone tries to be, you are completely dominated by your TDS. What you gibber and babble is completely erroneous. You could read the Constitution and go with what it reads, but you have been ordered to stay clear of that document lest it "confuse" you.


... and not the Constitution. I notice that the PRA completely omits any mention of "Article II. Section 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America." ... and this is where you blurt out "That doesn't mean anything!" Just a sidenote, when you cite dishonest, TDS-infested disinformation, you chop your argument off at the knees right at the starting line.


Yes, yes, we've already been over this, but I included that sentence because it was what you wrote to Tinkerpeach, almost a word-for-word direct copy, implying that your having sufficiently repeated some misinformation makes Tinkerpeach in the wrong for not having accepted it. You're a moron.


Really? The Constitution is not a long read. The President's authorizations are wrapped up in Article II. In fact, I'll post Article II for you right here:



So just read it. That which doesn't kill you makes you stronger. Contrary to what your thought-masters have told you, reading the Constitution will not kill you, nor will practicing its principles.

I've read it thanks.

And it backs up exactly what i say and that i was 100% and you 100% wrong.

You missed that in your derp idiocy, didn't you.

Feel free to quote any part you think makes your case though, so we can laugh some more.
 
200w.webp
200w.webp
200w.webp

I've read it thanks.
No you haven't. You're most welcome.

And it backs up exactly what i say
Nope. It kills your claim utterly.

Feel free to quote any part you think makes your case though, so we can laugh some more.
I guess you missed my quote and my posting of the entirety of Article II. Like I said, you ignore all new information because you find learning to be tantamount to torture, and you have already been ordered to never deviate from the TDS-party-line, i.e. we've been over this.

It's all captured in "you're a moron."

a50682aa55e64d666f79900d5ed98d79.jpg
 
No you haven't. You're most welcome.


Nope. It kills your claim utterly.
Ya i did and it makes my argument and crushes yours. So thx again.

I guess you missed my quote and my posting of the entirety of Article II. Like I said, you ignore all new information because you find learning to be tantamount to torture, and you have already been ordered to never deviate from the TDS-party-line, i.e. we've been over this.
Nope, saw it. that is what helped my argument and crushed yours.


It's all captured in "you're a moron."
And yet you posted arguments that provided me right and you wrong.
 
Back
Top