serendipity
Verified User
The judges repeatedly asked questions about who was harmed, and James' lawyers had no answer to that. They repeatedly asked about statute of limitations to no useful reply from James' lawyers. They asked how the size of the judgement was arrived at, to no good answer. They asked about jurisdictional conflicts to no good answer.
James' legal team had nothing for the court to justify the verdict reached or the case brought. It was clear the judges were very skeptical of the whole case and verdict.
Poor Dick is a prick, nothing new there!