Not looking good for Lettica James

The judges repeatedly asked questions about who was harmed, and James' lawyers had no answer to that. They repeatedly asked about statute of limitations to no useful reply from James' lawyers. They asked how the size of the judgement was arrived at, to no good answer. They asked about jurisdictional conflicts to no good answer.

James' legal team had nothing for the court to justify the verdict reached or the case brought. It was clear the judges were very skeptical of the whole case and verdict.

Poor Dick is a prick, nothing new there!
 
That was not the purpose. Short afternoons at the court were not interfering with his heavy schedule (golfing). He was not ordered by the judge to be there. He chose to because he saw his brilliant talks to the press as free campaigning. He was talking stupidly to the press. He heard great wisdom educating the people he has conned.
derp derp
 
The judges repeatedly asked questions about who was harmed, and James' lawyers had no answer to that. They repeatedly asked about statute of limitations to no useful reply from James' lawyers. They asked how the size of the judgement was arrived at, to no good answer. They asked about jurisdictional conflicts to no good answer.

James' legal team had nothing for the court to justify the verdict reached or the case brought. It was clear the judges were very skeptical of the whole case and verdict.
Imagine if it were to get to the SCOTUS if a far left court of appeals is asking those questions.

But of course it's so ridiculous it's going to die a quick death long before then.
 
Imagine if it were to get to the SCOTUS if a far left court of appeals is asking those questions.

But of course it's so ridiculous it's going to die a quick death long before then.
The problem there is if it does it set precedence. That means if the verdict goes against James it puts an end to her ability to use that particular law as a bludgeon politically. She's more likely to accept the loss than let that happen.
 
Back
Top