Notable dissident Russell Brand under attack


First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me

----------------------------------

We failed to learn.

Buckle Up.
 

The “canceled” have one thing in common: their commitment to the truth.

They came for Tucker Carlson because he spoke the truth.

They came for Joe Rogan because he had conversations about the truth.

They came for Jordan Peterson because he challenged their lies.

They came for Julian Assange and Edward Snowden because they revealed the truth.

They came for Elon Musk because he allowed the truth to be spoken.

Now they’ve come for Russell Brand because he’s showing others that it’s possible to engage with the truth by asking questions.

Tucker was fired because his LIES cost Fox almost a billion dollars.
Joe Rogan has been on the air for a long time. Nobody came for him. He is a conspiracy nut.
Nobody came after those people.
 
Tucker was fired because his LIES cost Fox almost a billion dollars.
Joe Rogan has been on the air for a long time. Nobody came for him. He is a conspiracy nut.
Nobody came after those people.

Tucker was fired for telling too much truth.
 
I can't even imagine what it will be to live without power because I have run out of carbon points or social credit points or digital currency points.

If my plan of dying before the really nasty shit gets here fails �� I might find out.
 
Had I known that the power would disappear for no good reason I would have charged my phone.

Fuck Me.

GOOD!
 
What's this guy opposing lately to earn him the dissident label?

Brand is a formerly "outrageous" surrealist comic (who wasn't all that funny to begin with) who has morphed into a pseudo-intellectual toeing a Progressive line.

In some ways I've struggled over the past couple of years to find him relevant or interesting.

How do those "Me Too" broads get away with that shit?

There's a LOT of information out there as to why women remain quiet after being attacked. Many blame themselves for the attack (I am uncertain why) or they know that if the DO report the attack they themselves will be demonized as, well, you know..."Me Too Broads" or some such other unappealing epithet. Most of the time if they do report it little is done to protect them and if they press charges and it becomes a court case they WILL BE TREATED LIKE WHORES.

There's not a lot of support for women who make accusations against famous/powerful men.

I liked Moore's Arthur a lot more, but that's just a subjective opinion, of course.

Yeah, Brand is hard to like in any setting.
 
Back
Top