Notice how SF has not uttered a word about the diapering aspect here.
I mean, it's glaring in its omission. Hmmmm.
Hold my hair back...
Notice how SF has not uttered a word about the diapering aspect here.
I mean, it's glaring in its omission. Hmmmm.
Hold my hair back...
Darling when Republicans allowed Exxon Mobil to write the United States energy policy behind closed doors, you forever lost any right to even utter the words "potential conflict of interest."
Sorry. But some of us have not been stricken with amnesia.
So Bill and Hillary Clinton managed to get every single Republican and 37 Democrats to vote for this bill? Seriously?
I'm all in favor of addressing conflicts of interest, but lets get real.
LMAO... oh darling, you really shouldn't attempt the 'well Republicans did it too' as a reason to justify your position. Simply makes you look childish.
Notice how SF has not uttered a word about the diapering aspect here.
I mean, it's glaring in its omission. Hmmmm.
I did not say that Dungster.... but to bury your head in the sand and pretend that there is just no way any potential conflict of interest existed in this situation is quite naive.
yeah, because his wearing diapers is the issue....
You've already made Onceler throw-up, now you are calling me darling? Does Damo have to bring vomit bags in?
Also, if you will read my previous post on this strawman, you will see, that is not the point.
Wouldn't it be funny if someone sent Vitter a congratulatory telegram to mark his new leadership position along with a Diaper Genie?
In fact, I think it is. I'm sorry, but what depths have we sunk to, when a man who pays women to diaper him, to diaper him , is on television lecturing people about ethics?
I'm sorry, but I am going to draw the line here. Blowjobs in the men's room at an airport, ok. But not this. This far, no farther.
There should be a constitutional amendment forever banning the practice of diapering on grown men.
What does getting diapered have to do with 'ethics'???
What is a diaper genie?
Go ahead, put all your heavyweights towards that one. Make sure to spend a lot of political capital along the way...There should be a constitutional amendment forever banning the practice of diapering on grown men.
Go ahead, put all your heavyweights towards that one. Make sure to spend a lot of political capital along the way...
And Darla, if you don't want them to call you darling, you shouldn't call them darling to start the ball rolling.
There is nothing like a distraction to keep topics away from scary real problems... Diapers notwithstanding (I saw a CSI about this once.) "they do it too" is something we should be talking about, not as an excuse for our own party, but as something we can work towards ending.
Yeah, because "quid pro quo" isn't something anybody would think after millions in donations...It was in a Bette Davis way!
And, once again, mister retard, it's not about they do it too. The Clintons haven't done anything! It's about the sudden onset amnesia some people have developed.