"Pass this Bill Now"...

A tea partier is the opposite of a neocon dude.

And yet they BOTH vote the GOP ticket, "dude". So either they're the stupid fucks I always suspected, or the serious self contradicting hypocritics they act as.

Boy are you stupid. Projecting again, bunky?
Really stupid.

Says the libertarian lunkhead who previously swore that the definition of "neocon" didn't apply to anyone I critiqued...now he's trying to pigeon hole definitions as to what, clean up what idiocy he'll endorse (or deny endorsing?)? The Liberty lunkhead strikes again!
 
Says the libertarian lunkhead who previously swore that the definition of "neocon" didn't apply to anyone I critiqued...now he's trying to pigeon hole definitions as to what, clean up what idiocy he'll endorse (or deny endorsing?)? The Liberty lunkhead strikes again!

:)
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Damo, your teabagger/neocon myopia is becoming progressively worse. Go back, read the exchange between Yurtle and myself, then check this out
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...316#post870316
I've got an idea,,,,, why don't we not go back and find out that you're really lacking in any logical statement.

Why go through the effort when we know you're wrong.

Translation: the Libertarian lunkhead cannot logically or factually refute my posts point for point, so he just brays the automatic gain saying and negativity. Like his idol Ron Paul, the Liberty lunkhead talks shit that he can't live up to himself.
 
Translation: the Libertarian lunkhead cannot logically or factually refute my posts point for point, so he just brays the automatic gain saying and negativity. Like his idol Ron Paul, the Liberty lunkhead talks shit that he can't live up to himself.

Yea,,,,,,,,,,, Ron Paul!
 
What makes this Congress different? The most interesting change is GOP strategy. Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell (KY) has threatened filibuster on a wide range of issues, in part to force Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) to negotiate with his party and in part just to gum up the works. Republicans have invoked filibusters or used other delaying tactics on controversial issues like Medicare prescription drugs, the war in Iraq, and domestic surveillance—and on non-controversial issues like ethics reform and electronic campaign disclosure.

http://www.american.com/archive/2008/march-april-magazine-contents/our-broken-senate





Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act
On January 17, an attempt to change ethics laws and rules failed after forty-five Republicans blocked it from coming to the floor for a vote. Several days later, the measure passed 96-2 after Senate leaders were able to compromise on their differences.<ref>Jonathan Weisman, "Republicans Halt Ethics Legislation," Washington Post, January 17, 2007.</ref>

See Congresspedia page on the Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2007.
Raising the minimum wage
On January 23, forty-three Republicans blocked an attempt to raise the federal minimum wage from $5.15 to $7.25 over two-years.<ref>Thomas Ferraro, "Senate Republicans block minimum wage hike," Reuters, January 24, 2007.</ref>

Template:Senate record vote

Several days later, the increase was passed 94-3 after several amendments allowing for small business tax breaks were added to the bill.

See Congresspedia page on minimum wage legislation.
Opposing the "surge"
On February 5, 2007, forty-six Republicans blocked an attempt by Democrats to consider a resolution opposing President Bush's plan to send an additional 21,500 troops into Iraq.<ref>Carl Hulse and Brian Knowlton, "Senate expected to approve — eventually — resolution on Iraq," International Herald Tribune, February 6, 2007.</ref>

http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/List_of_Filibusters_in_the_110th_Congress


Senate Republicans: Filibuster everything to win in November?

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/02/12/84487/senate-republicans-filibuster.html#ixzz1Y4fXQoa8

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/02/12/84487/senate-republicans-filibuster.html

your claim:

every proposal and attempt by the Obama administration and the Dems regarding the economy was either rejected or filibustered by the GOP

nothing in your post above proves your claim. as was suspected, you would not be able to prove your claim.

this is from one of the articles and it is hilarious, i have a feeling you didn't realize it was there:

However disruptive it is to governance, their extensive use of the filibuster — extended debate to block a decisive vote — could prove to be a valuable campaign asset this fall. Democrats used similar tactics in 2006 and won enough seats to gain a Senate majority. Now Republicans hope it's their turn.

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/02/12/84487/senate-republicans-filibuster.html#ixzz1YQPBOG4e

doubt you have a problem with dems doing this as well....lmao
 
But of course. There is a marked difference.

When democrats use filibuster, it is the minority protecting the voice of their constituency against the tyranny of the majority.
When republicans use filibuster, it is being obstructionist against the will of the people.

Because democratic politicians are of pure heart, only caring about their constituents, working hard to create a worker's utopia of equality.
Republicans are spawn of Satan who eat the livers out of newborn kittens.

It's all clear when one thinks with a mind so narrow it disappears when looked at edge-on.
 
Says the libertarian lunkhead who previously swore that the definition of "neocon" didn't apply to anyone I critiqued...now he's trying to pigeon hole definitions as to what, clean up what idiocy he'll endorse (or deny endorsing?)? The Liberty lunkhead strikes again!

It's great how you've hidden your errors from my reply.

I've never voted for a republican, or democrat in my life, and I bet I've been voting longer than you've been alive. But you already know this, because you actually read what I post. Right?

You make yourself look pathetic by defending one against the other in the way that you do. But then again your a marxist that doesn't care about your rights or your right to property as long as your right is to my property, and my (everyones) involuntary servitude.

Marxist=0
Anti-Marxist= 100.
As always.

Notice that I don't refer you to nonsense.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
The Libertarian lunkhead strikes again! Obviously he can't (or won't) read:

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/sho...323#post870323


Yeah, like his buddy Ron Paul of late, our Liberty lunkhead talks a LOT of BS and blows smoke about things he can't live up to in actuality. Watch him dance, folks.

There's something here,,, I know.

You're trying to make a point here I'm sure.

:confused:

See folks, the chronology of the posts makes a complete ass of the Liberty lunkhead...hence his lame retort here.

Say goodnight Gracie!
 
What makes this Congress different? The most interesting change is GOP strategy. Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell (KY) has threatened filibuster on a wide range of issues, in part to force Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) to negotiate with his party and in part just to gum up the works. Republicans have invoked filibusters or used other delaying tactics on controversial issues like Medicare prescription drugs, the war in Iraq, and domestic surveillance—and on non-controversial issues like ethics reform and electronic campaign disclosure.

http://www.american.com/archive/2008...-broken-senate





Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act
On January 17, an attempt to change ethics laws and rules failed after forty-five Republicans blocked it from coming to the floor for a vote. Several days later, the measure passed 96-2 after Senate leaders were able to compromise on their differences.<ref>Jonathan Weisman, "Republicans Halt Ethics Legislation," Washington Post, January 17, 2007.</ref>

See Congresspedia page on the Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2007.
Raising the minimum wage
On January 23, forty-three Republicans blocked an attempt to raise the federal minimum wage from $5.15 to $7.25 over two-years.<ref>Thomas Ferraro, "Senate Republicans block minimum wage hike," Reuters, January 24, 2007.</ref>

Template:Senate record vote

Several days later, the increase was passed 94-3 after several amendments allowing for small business tax breaks were added to the bill.

See Congresspedia page on minimum wage legislation.
Opposing the "surge"
On February 5, 2007, forty-six Republicans blocked an attempt by Democrats to consider a resolution opposing President Bush's plan to send an additional 21,500 troops into Iraq.<ref>Carl Hulse and Brian Knowlton, "Senate expected to approve — eventually — resolution on Iraq," International Herald Tribune, February 6, 2007.</ref>

http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/List_...110th_Congress


Senate Republicans: Filibuster everything to win in November?

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/02/1...#ixzz1Y4fXQoa8

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/02/1...ilibuster.html


your claim:

every proposal and attempt by the Obama administration and the Dems regarding the economy was either rejected or filibustered by the GOP

nothing in your post above proves your claim. as was suspected, you would not be able to prove your claim.

this is from one of the articles and it is hilarious, i have a feeling you didn't realize it was there:

However disruptive it is to governance, their extensive use of the filibuster — extended debate to block a decisive vote — could prove to be a valuable campaign asset this fall. Democrats used similar tactics in 2006 and won enough seats to gain a Senate majority. Now Republicans hope it's their turn.

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/02/12/84487/senate-republicans-filibuster.html#ixzz1YQPBOG4e

doubt you have a problem with dems doing this as well....lmao


Yurtle has finally flipped, folks. I give a list of documented filibusters and stone walls from the GOP aimed at Obama and the Dems, and Yurt just stubbornly denies they exist! This is why most posters just ignore Yurtle after awhile, because you cannot argue with irrational, insipidly stubborn people like Yurtle.

Yurtle is not too bright folks, because he combed the article to find a sentence that suited his narrative, but ignored the FACT that the article DOCUMENTS THE EXTENSIVE use of the filibuster. NO ONE EVER STATED THAT THE FILIBUSTER HAS NOT BEEN USED BY BOTH PARTIES OVER THE YEARS, the point I was making was that the GOP has logged a RECORD use against this one President.

Poor Yurtle....his general stupidity coupled with his willful ignorance and neocon/teabagger myopia has been his own undoing yet again.

Say goodnight Gracie.
 
But of course. There is a marked difference.

When democrats use filibuster, it is the minority protecting the voice of their constituency against the tyranny of the majority.
When republicans use filibuster, it is being obstructionist against the will of the people.

Because democratic politicians are of pure heart, only caring about their constituents, working hard to create a worker's utopia of equality.
Republicans are spawn of Satan who eat the livers out of newborn kittens.

It's all clear when one thinks with a mind so narrow it disappears when looked at edge-on.

I provided that imbecile Yurt with documented proof of the GOP's excesive abuse of the filibuster.....never said the Dems have never used it. What's burning your dopey ass is the FACT that the GOP is so blantantly hypocritical and arrogant in their actions that no logical excuse can be given.

But Good Luck with trying to pass off your BS as poignant sarcasm
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Says the libertarian lunkhead who previously swore that the definition of "neocon" didn't apply to anyone I critiqued...now he's trying to pigeon hole definitions as to what, clean up what idiocy he'll endorse (or deny endorsing?)? The Liberty lunkhead strikes again!

It's great how you've hidden your errors from my reply.

Stop lying, you Liberty lunkhead! Since I'm the one that is constantly referring to the "chronology of the posts", there is no way that I hide anything. Just because you claim something doesn't make it so, Liberty...the chronology of the posts proves that.I've never voted for a republican, or democrat in my life, and I bet I've been voting longer than you've been alive. But you already know this, because you actually read what I post. Right?

For someone who is constantly swearing that he has nothing to do with the neocon/teabagger GOP, our Liberty lunkhead has constantly come to the defense of their policies on these boards. The chronology of the posts shows this. Also, if this braying libertarian loon has been voting "longer than I've been alive", then he must be the OLDEST poster in history!
:awesome:

You make yourself look pathetic by defending one against the other in the way that you do. But then again your a marxist that doesn't care about your rights or your right to property as long as your right is to my property, and my (everyones) involuntary servitude.

Marxist=0
Anti-Marxist= 100.
As always.

Ahh, so the Libertarian lunkhead shows his true colors....which is a total BS artist. Since I've started at least two threads criticizing Obama, the Libertarian lunkhead just resorts to the last ploy of the ignorant political idealogue...demonization of opposing views. Now anyone who knows the basic dictionary definition of marxism knows damned well that neither Dem nor Repub fit that definition. But like I said, Liberty cannot logically or factually refute or disprove what I put forth, so this is all he's got.

Libertarians are a fucking joke, folks....as Ron Paul recently proved with his latest statements. They offer nothing but convoluted claptrap to try and act as if their Spartan society fantasies actually fool people from their pseudo-ultra conservative hypocrisy. Our Liberty lunkhead is no different.

Notice that I don't refer you to nonsense.


See my above responses. The criticisms against the latest jobs bill is just more neocon/teabagger stupidity....dupes to the rich who shit on them daily. Carry on, my Liberty Lunkhead.
 


Taichiliberal said;
"See my above responses. The criticisms against the latest jobs bill is just more neocon/teabagger stupidity....dupes to the rich who shit on them daily. Carry on, my Liberty Lunkhead."

The jobs bill would be great if you, and everyone like you would start writing a check to the gov't.

Today.

But that's not what its (you're) all about. A mandate without choice is what you support.

As for me, a ball & chain around the the neck of the federal gov'ts control over the lives of people and busisness owners would work real nice.

Something you're against.

Taichiliberal also says;

"Stop lying, you Liberty lunkhead! Since I'm the one that is constantly referring to the "chronology of the posts", there is no way that I hide anything. Just because you claim something doesn't make it so, Liberty...the chronology of the posts proves that."

And your point is? What if I can't find your point, or "chronology of the posts". Why can't you clarify things. Is it maybe because you're lost?


Taichiliberal said;
"Ahh, so the Libertarian lunkhead shows his true colors....which is a total BS artist. Since I've started at least two threads criticizing Obama, the Libertarian lunkhead just resorts to the last ploy of the ignorant political idealogue...demonization of opposing views. Now anyone who knows the basic dictionary definition of marxism knows damned well that neither Dem nor Repub fit that definition. But like I said, Liberty cannot logically or factually refute or disprove what I put forth, so this is all he's got."

Marxism = an income tax, department of education, federal reserve to start with. Both reps and dems sign on to it. Please keep making an ass out of yourself.

Taichiliberal said;
"Libertarians are a fucking joke, folks....as Ron Paul recently proved with his latest statements. They offer nothing but convoluted claptrap to try and act as if their Spartan society fantasies actually fool people from their pseudo-ultra conservative hypocrisy. Our Liberty lunkhead is no different."

Socialists are a joke,,,,,,

dude.

They're lazy losers, looking for a free ride off of my dime.
 
The jobs bill would be great if you, and everyone like you would start writing a check to the gov't.

Today.

But that's not what its (you're) all about. A mandate without choice is what you support.

As for me, a ball & chain around the the neck of the federal gov'ts control over the lives of people and busisness owners would work real nice.

Something you're against.

Taichiliberal also says;

"Stop lying, you Liberty lunkhead! Since I'm the one that is constantly referring to the "chronology of the posts", there is no way that I hide anything. Just because you claim something doesn't make it so, Liberty...the chronology of the posts proves that."

And your point is? What if I can't find your point, or "chronology of the posts". Why can't you clarify things. Is it maybe because you're lost?


Taichiliberal said;
"Ahh, so the Libertarian lunkhead shows his true colors....which is a total BS artist. Since I've started at least two threads criticizing Obama, the Libertarian lunkhead just resorts to the last ploy of the ignorant political idealogue...demonization of opposing views. Now anyone who knows the basic dictionary definition of marxism knows damned well that neither Dem nor Repub fit that definition. But like I said, Liberty cannot logically or factually refute or disprove what I put forth, so this is all he's got."

Marxism = an income tax, department of education, federal reserve to start with. Both reps and dems sign on to it. Please keep making an ass out of yourself.

Taichiliberal said;
"Libertarians are a fucking joke, folks....as Ron Paul recently proved with his latest statements. They offer nothing but convoluted claptrap to try and act as if their Spartan society fantasies actually fool people from their pseudo-ultra conservative hypocrisy. Our Liberty lunkhead is no different."

Socialists are a joke,,,,,,

dude.

They're lazy losers, looking for a free ride off of my dime.

Reality check:

Per Merriam-Webster:

the political, economic, and social principles and policies advocated by Marx; especially : a theory and practice of socialism including the labor theory of value, dialectical materialism, the class struggle, and dictatorship of the proletariat until the establishment of a classless society


As you can see above, the Liberty lunkhead didn't have the brains or the cojones to research the true definition of Marxism, of which neither Democratic nor Republican party adhere to in practice or philosophy. So the Liberty lunkhead was WRONG, but like all libertarian assholes, Liberty cannot admit error, and will continue to treat his personal opinions, supposition and conjectures as fact despite historical evidence to the contrary.

This is why trying to engage the Liberty lunkhead in an honest and rational discussion fails shortly after the start...because he's incapable of honesty and rational discussion when faced with facts and logic that prove his libertarian BS wrong. The rest of his BS about not being able to find or discern the point of previous pionts tells us that either the Liberty lunkhead is basically ignorant of 8th grade reading comprehension or a liar. Judging by his "dictionary definition" of marxism, I'm leaning towards the latter. (which pretty much puts his opinion of "socialism" to a piss in the wind.).

Obama called out the GOP for the obstructionist SOB's that they are with no regards for American workers or their jobs....and as the CBO rates his bill, all the old Rovian talking points just are not cutting it.....and it just burns the asses of the neocon/teabagger/libertarian jackassess to no end.
 
Yurtle has finally flipped, folks. I give a list of documented filibusters and stone walls from the GOP aimed at Obama and the Dems, and Yurt just stubbornly denies they exist! This is why most posters just ignore Yurtle after awhile, because you cannot argue with irrational, insipidly stubborn people like Yurtle.

Yurtle is not too bright folks, because he combed the article to find a sentence that suited his narrative, but ignored the FACT that the article DOCUMENTS THE EXTENSIVE use of the filibuster. NO ONE EVER STATED THAT THE FILIBUSTER HAS NOT BEEN USED BY BOTH PARTIES OVER THE YEARS, the point I was making was that the GOP has logged a RECORD use against this one President.

Poor Yurtle....his general stupidity coupled with his willful ignorance and neocon/teabagger myopia has been his own undoing yet again.

Say goodnight Gracie.

do you ever tell the truth? where did i deny they exist? i even quoted an article that said they exist you dishonest hack. now you're changing your original claim from "every" to "extensive". you lied, got busted and now you're moving the goal posts to hide your embarrassing lie.

and as i predicted, you have no problem when the dems use the same tactics. political hack.
 
Reality check:

Per Merriam-Webster:

the political, economic, and social principles and policies advocated by Marx; especially : a theory and practice of socialism including the labor theory of value, dialectical materialism, the class struggle, and dictatorship of the proletariat until the establishment of a classless society

This has been proven to be an apology for the true reality of what Marxism really is.

Marxism only exists to make the rich richer, and the poor poorer. It takes away opportunity, and makes the masses dependent, and lazy. Look at East Germany, the USSR, N. Korea, Cuba, etc. A complete failure.

Marxism mandates compliance.

Opportunity (liberty) is quite the opposite.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Reality check:

Per Merriam-Webster:

the political, economic, and social principles and policies advocated by Marx; especially : a theory and practice of socialism including the labor theory of value, dialectical materialism, the class struggle, and dictatorship of the proletariat until the establishment of a classless society

This has been proven to be an apology for the true reality of what Marxism really is. Really? By whom? YOU? :palm: Newsflash: the Liberty lunkhead's opinion and a metro card only gets him on the bus, nothing else.
Marxism only exists to make the rich richer, and the poor poorer. It takes away opportunity, and makes the masses dependent, and lazy. Look at East Germany, the USSR, N. Korea, Cuba, etc. A complete failure.


Which has NOTHING to do with the Democratic or Republican party, of which this clown previously alluded were both "marxist" in nature....unless this Liberty moron equates all gov't systems that support a monetary tier system as marxist....the UK, USA, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Chile, Saudia Arabia, Indonesia, etc., etc. Once again, the Liberty lunkhead's version of how the world works is rift with convoluted logic, willfully ignorance and insipid stubborness.
Marxism mandates compliance.

Opportunity (liberty) is quite the opposite.

Notice that when Teabaggers/neocons/libertarians cannot admit they are wrong, they wave the flag in one form or another. Making moot point statements that have NOTHING to do with the subject at hand seems to be Liberty's lame ass attempt at a dodge....which fails as usual.

Obama called out the GOP for the obstructionist SOB's that they are with no regards for American workers or their jobs....and as the CBO rates his bill, all the old Rovian talking points just are not cutting it.....and it just burns the asses of the neocon/teabagger/libertarian jackassess to no end.
 
Back
Top