Pearls of wisdom from "the first"

Lionfish

Pocket lint
Contributor
Your government on display.

cd4e62c1c9765d3a.jpeg
 
What is wrong with what she said?

Cope.

Q: Why would you believe that the shooter was a victim in a school shooting?
A (The left): Because we want the news agencies to report that it is your fault no matter who the shooter is or why they did it.
 
Q: Why would you believe that the shooter was a victim in a school shooting?
A (The left): Because we want the news agencies to report that it is your fault no matter who the shooter is or why they did it.

Q: Why would the right believe that the news agencies claim that the shooter was a victim?
A: (The right): Because we want to alter the narrative to further the trans hate and harassment.
 
Q: Why would the right believe that the news agencies claim that the shooter was a victim?
A: (The right): Because we want to alter the narrative to further the trans hate and harassment.

A: (The sane): Because you (Biden's Press Secretary and leftists) are saying that folks in that particular group are the "real victims" and how much you support them.... That's why.

Instead of talking about the children who were killed and by whom we are now holding a conversation, begun by The Worst Press Secretary of All Time, where we are talking about a victim class who were not involved in the shooting except as a perpetrator. There were six innocents killed and one killer. Six, not seven.
 
A: (The sane): Because you (Biden's Press Secretary and leftists) are saying that folks in that particular group are the "real victims" and how much you support them.... That's why.

If you are truly sane, you'd realize that she was talking about the trans community, not the shooter. See how altering the narrative affects your way of thinking? It's pretty obvious from where I stand.

President Biden HAS ALREADY addressed the shooting. If the PressSec has done that, she would merely repeat what Biden said, which everyone already knew what he said.

Instead of talking about the children who were killed and by whom we are now holding a conversation, begun by The Worst Press Secretary of All Time, where we are talking about a victim class who were not involved in the shooting except as a perpetrator. There were six innocents killed and one killer.

Already was addressed. See above.

Six, not seven.

See? You are literally proving my point perfectly and soundly.
 
If you are truly sane, you'd realize that she was talking about the trans community, not the shooter. See how altering the narrative affects your way of thinking? It's pretty obvious from where I stand.

President Biden HAS ALREADY addressed the shooting. If the PressSec has done that, she would merely repeat what Biden said, which everyone already knew what he said.



Already was addressed. See above.



See? You are literally proving my point perfectly and soundly.

Biden didn't address the shooting in any way that would be acceptable by any other president. What he did was he had a quick comedy club standup act about ice cream where he then also talked about the shooting.
 
Biden didn't address the shooting in any way that would be acceptable by any other president. What he did was he had a quick comedy club standup act about ice cream where he then also talked about the shooting.

*Sighs*

Can't win with those guys.
 
*Sighs*

Can't win with those guys.

We didn't vote for him. But thankfully we now know that he's the husband of the doctoriest doctor of all doctorhood in doctoring. When Fauci wakes up in the morning he genuflects to Jill, then prays that someday he can be as doctory as she.
 
We didn't vote for him. But thankfully we now know that he's the husband of the doctoriest doctor of all doctorhood in doctoring. When Fauci wakes up in the morning he genuflects to Jill, then prays that someday he can be as doctory as she.

Yeah yeah yeah ok ok ok. :)
 
Back
Top