Pearls of wisdom from "the first"

Lionfish said:
1680788543903-png.1247056
Click to expand...

How is she wrong?
 
Damocles said:
A: (The sane): Because you (Biden's Press Secretary and leftists) are saying that folks in that particular group are the "real victims" and how much you support them.... That's why.

Instead of talking about the children who were killed and by whom we are now holding a conversation, begun by The Worst Press Secretary of All Time, where we are talking about a victim class who were not involved in the shooting except as a perpetrator. There were six innocents killed and one killer. Six, not seven.
Click to expand...

Who in the Administration has said the "real victims" are trans and not expressed heartache for the victims?

What is revealing about all this is, once again, how hard up the Right is for thoughtful grievances against the Administration. They seem only able to make shit up.
 
Damocles said:
Q: Why would you believe that the shooter was a victim in a school shooting?
A (The left): Because we want the news agencies to report that it is your fault no matter who the shooter is or why they did it.
Click to expand...
The statement is accurate, and if you read the forum, you realize it is the truth.

I don’t see anything in the meme that mentions the shooter? Did I miss something?

It does always interest me as to what trouble in people’s lives bring them to this point, so I do feel bad for them, but no sympathy for what they did. My heart goes out to their victims and families, especially the families who never get over the needless violent death of their loved ones.

The trans community will be attacked because like after 911, sick people decide to target a community for the acts of a few.

That was the point of her statement.
 
BartenderElite said:
We can do this all day. She's clearly talking about the backlash against the trans community (which is quite visible, especially on Fox and in DC), because of the actions of one criminal individual.
Click to expand...
It happened to other communities, like Muslims after 9/11. The is what her comment was addressing.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Yes, it does. To make it perfectly clear Muppet head is wrong. It is up to the DoJ to decide if they wish to prosecute that crime as a hate crime.
Click to expand...

She said it is not up to them. She isn't wrong.

And I find your term distasteful. Why do you go lower and lower to their level? You're better than that.
 
AProudLefty said:
She said it is not up to them. She isn't wrong.

And I find your term distasteful. Why do you go lower and lower to their level? You're better than that.
Click to expand...

Yes, it is. The feds can decide to prosecute or not. The state doesn't make that decision. Remember the "Knockout Game" going on during Obama's administration? Mostly Blacks doing it. They attacked the elderly, Jews, Whites, other Blacks, Asians, etc. Then a mentally ill White guy in Houston did it. Suddenly Holder's DoJ was all on him like stink on shit for a hate crime prosecution. Only one that the DoJ did against someone who did that crime.

Same thing here. The DoJ could decide it's a hate crime and prosecute. That's their decision. What's-her-name is just deflecting from the FACT that the Joke administration is one of the most racist, bigoted, and biased since at least the 50's. They're dodging this one because it goes hard against the radical Leftist narrative about the LGBTPDQRSTUVW community being oppressed. That means they can't be oppressors. It's the ill-logic of CRT.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top