Suppose there was a way to tell if a baby would be born gay. Not that any sane person believes it's genetic, but assuming it's was true, would you be OK with someone aborting it because it was gay? If you answer no, then you're being dishonest. You're the ones who want a woman to be allowed to abort their child for any reason, up to and even after birth. So if you say you have a problem with aborting gay babies, then you are a hypocrite. After all, it's HER BODY. Are you going to tell her she can't do it?
Question for liberals...
- Thread starter Grugore
- Start date
jimmymccready
Verified User
Most sane people of course believe homosexuality is in great part genetic.
Wouldn't that make them bigoted and homophobic, too?
It's the same type hypocrisy many of them have when it comes to same sex marriage. They claim to support that two people who love each other should be able to get married yet oppose certain types of marriages because they think they're wrong even when the reason is the two people love each others. Wonder how they'd choose if the two homosexuals that wanted to get married were brothers?
As a disclaimer, I don't support incestuous marriages. Using the example to show their hypocrisy.
Last edited:
Any scientific proof for that snowflake?
ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
Excuse me, sir. Did you notice that your straw man is on fire? I thought you'd want to know.
As you know, you statement isn't true. To claim what you claim, you'd have to believe that everything in life is open to choice except sexual orientation. Only an idiot would believe that. But whatever makes you feel better for choosing to be a fag.
If being queer was genetic, there wouldn't be any queers left. It's an evolutionary dead end.
I’m one “who want a woman to be allowed to abort her child for any reason, up to and even after birth”?
Go ahead and prove your claim, lying bitch.
The forum will wait for another lie from you.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Holy shit, really? Are you trolling?
Very very few Liberals think that's ok.
She can abort her gay baby solely for being gay if it's done early. I don't think late term abortions should be legal except in extreme cases.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
If two queers want to hook up, I have problem with that. What I do have a problem with is the attitude that not only would forbid me to disagree with it, but to actually make such disagreement a criminal offense. Not only do they wish to prevent any and all discent, they insist that we condone and even endorse it.
Jade Dragon
And I'm the one that jaded you.
Excuse me, sir. Did you notice that your straw man is on fire? I thought you'd want to know.
You beat me to it. As a person of faith, and someone with bad OCD; I can say, living by what if, is a path with endless pitfalls, that gets you no where. It's a path that can lead to madness.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
I don't agree with hate speech laws either, but that's not really an issue in America. As far as I know, nobody is calling to ban homophobia.
ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
Gay men still have active sperm and are able to impregnate women. Ask the children whose dads later came out of the closet, after marrying their moms because society looks down so hard on them.
As for the rest of your nonsense question, I don't see that ever being an issue. "Why's that?" you didn't ask. Because the only women who would even consider aborting a child simply because a non-existent test showed that the fetus might be gay are the very same women who are virulently anti-abortion religious fundie forced-birthers.
PS -- There is no such thing as post-birth "abortion." That's called "murder" and is illegal.
Every sane person knows a kid is born gay. Who would choose to be gay? That is against our drive to pass down our genes. It is setting yourself up for abuse and hate by strangers. It is making life far more difficult. Nope, gays are acting as they were born.
Last edited:
Sirthinksalot
Verified User
Ever hear of a recessive gene?
Sirthinksalot
Verified User
Are you saying everything in life is based on a choice except sexual orientation?
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
I don't know why anyone would even answer such a stupid hypothetical question like this idiot OP is asking- just for his trolling entertainment.
Let me tell you why- Because no matter how you answer his question, he is ready to attack you and your answer no matter what your answer is. He has it planned out in advance how he will try and insult your intelligence no matter how you answer his stupid hypothetical question.
2ndly, there will never be a way to detect a person's sexual preference before birth, after birth, and all the way up to the person's becoming mature enough to become sexually active. So basically, not only is this idiot's question totally hypothetical, it's totally impossible to ever be a real life choice.
Why entertain these hateful idiots here in this forum that ask such stupid questions that are just here to express and carry out their hateful agenda on people that do not agree with them.
Total Thread Fail!
Let me tell you why- Because no matter how you answer his question, he is ready to attack you and your answer no matter what your answer is. He has it planned out in advance how he will try and insult your intelligence no matter how you answer his stupid hypothetical question.
2ndly, there will never be a way to detect a person's sexual preference before birth, after birth, and all the way up to the person's becoming mature enough to become sexually active. So basically, not only is this idiot's question totally hypothetical, it's totally impossible to ever be a real life choice.
Why entertain these hateful idiots here in this forum that ask such stupid questions that are just here to express and carry out their hateful agenda on people that do not agree with them.
Total Thread Fail!