REDUX: How Election Fraud Is Conducted By The Democrat/RINO (Uni)Party

Yes, yes, anyone who doesn't subscribe to the hysterical nazi trumptard propaganda is a "RINO".
Another hallmark of dumbfuck leftists is their complete lack of any education. Nazis are socialists/leftists, not conservatives. Educated people know this. Leftists are uneducated, and are thus gullible, and have been ordered by their slave masters to believe that conservatives are socialists ... and leftists OBEY.

Another hallmark of dumbfuck leftists is their inability to spot a RINO.
 
Another hallmark of dumbfuck leftists is their complete lack of any education. Nazis are socialists/leftists, not conservatives. Educated people know this. Leftists are uneducated, and are thus gullible, and have been ordered by their slave masters to believe that conservatives are socialists ... and leftists OBEY.

Another hallmark of dumbfuck leftists is their inability to spot a RINO.

If by "Educated people" you mean people who receive their education through learned texts and scholars as compared to immersing themselves in political websites, they know Nazism is fascism, a far Right ideology.
 
How many ballots were filled out by poll workers? How many were scanned multiples?

I can tell YOU location and number of double scanned ballots for an event that actually happened and wasn't people chasing conspiracy theories.

Location: Georgia
Number: ~200

Some ballots initially double-counted in Fulton before recount

Almost 200 duplicate found when ballot images made public

 
Another hallmark of dumbfuck leftists is their complete lack of any education. Nazis are socialists/leftists, not conservatives.
Really? When why are they roaming around CPAC? Why does the fat orange king dine with them at his shitty country club?

Educated people know this!
 
If by "Educated people" you mean people who receive their education through learned texts and scholars as compared to immersing themselves in political websites, they know Nazism is fascism, a far Right ideology.
Fascism is a form of socialism. It is not 'far right'. It is supported by DEMOCRATS. It is what you want!

Trying to deny the writings of Karl Marx won't work.

Maybe you're illiterate. Maybe you can't read such advanced material.
 
How many ballots were filled out by poll workers? How many were scanned multiples?

I can tell YOU location and number of double scanned ballots for an event that actually happened and wasn't people chasing conspiracy theories.

Location: Georgia
Number: ~200

Some ballots initially double-counted in Fulton before recount

Almost 200 duplicate found when ballot images made public

Argument from randU fallacy. Quoting made up numbers won't work.
You can't make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear.
 
Argument from randU fallacy. Quoting made up numbers won't work.
You can't make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats just disappear.
The best part of your dishonesty/insanity is that, quite literally, all you have is made up numbers. I mean, somebody went through pictures of ballots, one picture at a time, and found which ones had been scanned twice. You call those made up numbers, but you are all in on the randomly generated numbers from some CPA, somewhere in the country?

How do you even function in life?

Almost forgot... I'm not trying to make evidence disappear. You are unable to make evidence appear.
 
The best part of your dishonesty/insanity is that, quite literally, all you have is made up numbers. I mean, somebody went through pictures of ballots, one picture at a time, and found which ones had been scanned twice. You call those made up numbers, but you are all in on the randomly generated numbers from some CPA, somewhere in the country?

How do you even function in life?

Almost forgot... I'm not trying to make evidence disappear. You are unable to make evidence appear.
Argument of the Stone fallacy. You are making shit up. Your desperation to ignore the evidence is obvious. You can't make it disappear, dude.
 
I can tell YOU location and number of double scanned ballots for an event that actually happened and wasn't people chasing conspiracy theories.
Nope. You are ignoring sworn testimony without refuting it. The number of fraudulent ballots in Georgia is at least 500,000 and could be in the millions. You know this and refuse to be honest.
 
Argument of the Stone fallacy. You are making shit up. Your desperation to ignore the evidence is obvious. You can't make it disappear, dude.
The funny thing is that you are a very skilled troll. You sprinkle in just enough normal responses and legit points to keep me wondering....and responding.
 
Nope. You are ignoring sworn testimony without refuting it. The number of fraudulent ballots in Georgia is at least 500,000 and could be in the millions. You know this and refuse to be honest.
Sworn testimony only means that somebody thinks they witness something.

The onus is on the person making the claim to prove their claim. It's not my job to refute every crazy thing that somebody believes.
 
Who are "they"?


Who are "them"?


Educated people know to use antecedents.
You should find an orderly in your institution and have them help you interpret this:


NATIONAL HARBOR, Md. — Nazis appeared to find a friendly reception at the Conservative Political Action Conference this year.

Throughout the conference, racist extremists, some of whom had secured official CPAC badges, openly mingled with conference attendees and espoused antisemitic conspiracy theories.


The presence of these individuals has been a persistent issue at CPAC. In previous years, conference organizers have ejected well-known Nazis and white supremacists such as Nick Fuentes.
 
Sworn testimony only means that somebody thinks they witness something.
Incorrect. You need to refute it. You haven't refuted it.

The onus is on the person making the claim to prove their claim.
The onus on the observer is to report what was observed.

I am the one drawing the conclusion and I am not on trial.

It's not my job to refute every crazy thing that somebody believes.
It is your job to refute every single thing that debunks your claim. The onus is on you to support your claim.
 
You should find an orderly in your institution and have them help you interpret this:
You should find a therapist to help you with your gullibility. You still haven't identified anyone you were calling "them" or "they."

What is your first language, if I may ask?
 
Incorrect. You need to refute it. You haven't refuted it.


The onus on the observer is to report what was observed.

I am the one drawing the conclusion and I am not on trial.


It is your job to refute every single thing that debunks your claim. The onus is on you to support your claim.
Lol ... The guy in Georgia that found the 200 ballots that were scanned twice had actual solid evidence of what he was claiming. A person could try to refute that by, for example, finding differences in the two ballots that you was claiming were scanned twice.

You claim there were 50,000 fraudulent ballots that were found and reported in sworn testimony. Which ballots? Which state? Where are these ballots? I can tell you where the double scanned ballots are. They are in Georgia. There are pictures of them.

The people who think they saw something provide nothing to refute. There's no way to refute stories conjured up in someone's mind.
 
Back
Top