Your loss. It's rather fun. You probably don't know how to do it, since you don't understand vector equations or even statistical math.
Ah...another that confuses geology with chemistry.
It is nonsense and gibberish.The only reason I posted the spacetime interval equation and link is because your boyfriendIBDumbass was hollering at me that my OP about the spacetime interval was nonsense and gibberish.
^^^
A correct call. He has not only made omniscience fallacies, he continues to make them, as well as void reference fallacies and false authority fallacies. He seems to think that science and/or mathematics is defined as some kind of college course, as if a college has magickal powers to redefine these words. He has, of course, already shown errors in algebra and vector mathematics. In the past he has shown errors in statistical mathematics and probability mathematics as well. He has so far denied and discarded Kepler's laws, Galileo's work, Newton's Law of Motion. Newton's Law of Gravitation, Einstein's Law of Relativity, Einsteins' law of Special Relativity, Heisenberg's Law, Planck's Laws, the source of the Periodical Table of the Elements, quantum mechanics, the Periodical Table of Quarks, acid/base chemistry (guess how!), Gibb's Law, Ohm's Law, Kirchoff's Law, and electrochemistry.
He has shown some illiteracy in the past as well. I've had to correct him on some of them, including failure to capitalize proper names, failure to capitalize the beginning of a sentence, the improper use of commas, and various misspellings. He also thinks a dictionary defines a word.
Bingo. He cuts and pastes from that resource and considers it a God...infallible.
Bingo. Again, he is turning to his crappy 'references' and his religions instead.
No, he isn't. There are plenty of others. This is just the most recent one you have dealt with here. You might recognize the Sock on other forums though, such as Swan.
It is for the moment, but he loses it when he's angry. Won't be long now!
Too funny. Like I said, you're just a political leftist; you can't apply any critical reasoning in the real world. Just let me know when you need some help.
Don't change the subject. You recommended I enroll in college courses to learn science. I asked you to be specific in that regard. Please tell me what I don't know and in what courses I should enroll so that I can properly consider your suggestion.
Fortunately for me, all universities and colleges consider my "preparation" to be more than adequate for any science courses in which I might wish to enroll, so all I need now is for you to tell me what I do not know and what science courses I need to take.
I don't know how to do this, as I have never done it. Will you teach me? Can you give me some pointers? What are your preferred techniques? I happy to take notes on whatever you teach me.
You're a psycho, Sybil. You are unable to learn because your thinker is broken.
I accept your tacit confession you have never been to college, never taken a college level science class and the litany of buzzwords and rudimentary concepts you are aware of just comes from googling around on Wikipedia, blog science, and elsewhere on the interwebs.
You're insane, Sybil.
Relativity in a non accelerating inertial reference frame has been known about since Galileo. All classical relativity means is that the laws of physics are the same for all observers in different non accelerating reference frames. Einstein added mathmatical rigour to special relativity, and he added electromagnetism to relativity in terms of light. General relativity considered accelerating reference frames, aka gravity.
Too funny. Like I said, you're just a political leftist; you can't apply any critical reasoning in the real world. Just let me know when you need some help.
Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.
