Russians have ' lowered the bar ' for nuclear weapons usage.

Nordberg said:
Russia has used long-range missiles against Ukraine. How is it an escalation if Ukraine uses them?
Click to expand...
They are NATO weapons- which depend upon NATO operators using NATO satellites. NATO permission to attack Russia with them would be direct NATO involvement.
It isn't a matter of whether they would use them or not- it's a matter of where they will glass first.
Israel would be a good choice, imo. Israel isn't a NATO member either- and few would miss it.

Mind you- the Israelis should receive warning in advance. Let's say ten minutes to make themselves scarce. That's five times as long as the Zionist scum give Palestinian civilians.
 
moon said:
Ukraine is not a NATO member- but the Russians would use nukes against anybody that becomes directly involved in attacking Russia, I believe.
Click to expand...
So their “new” doctrine is that they would use nukes against anybody that becomes directly involved in attacking Russia. That would be Ukraine. Same as the old doctrine.
 
moon said:
They are NATO weapons- which depend upon NATO operators using NATO satellites. NATO permission to attack Russia with them would be direct NATO involvement.
It isn't a matter of whether they would use them or not- it's a matter of where they will glass first.
Israel would be a good choice, imo. Israel isn't a NATO member either- and few would miss it.
Click to expand...
So now you’re saying Russia would will nuke a NATO country. Riiiiight!
You don’t give much credit for Putin’s intelligence.
He already misjudged Ukraine’s and NATO’s response to his invasion so now he’s going to triple down on his fuckups?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top