you again fail to understand. You're not penning Shakespeare here... you're just being stubborn to the point of insipidness. The chronology of the post shows your intent...to deny it is just absurd. given your end thoughts, i am not surprised. Of course not....because you're incapable of understanding true sarcasm or a quick turn of a phrase. To dumb it down for you....I'm mocking your childish "meadowmuffins" retort. you're a political hack that when handed the truth, ignores it, and goes right back to your argument, as if i never said it wasn't about what you claim Let's see, YOU make some assinine attempt to compare Sanford's illegal blunder to Obama's legitmacy, and when I point out the logical flaw in your reasoning, you whine "political hack"...either you're delusional, insipidly stubborn or truly ignorant of what determines a "hack". You only handed out your OPINION, and your opinion is NOT necessarily a conclusive truth....neocon parrots have a hard time dealing with that....and then you tell me to take tummy medicine..... Again, you just don't understand when someone is mocking you...I suggest you get an adult to explain it to you....I just don't have the patience.
your post is nothing but empty talking points with a weak attempt at insulting to make yourself look better. you don't fool me, and the only people you fool are those who are hacks like you. A lot of bluff and bluster to try and deflect the fact that I deconstructed your silly contention using simple logic. No one is trying to "fool" you....just educate you.
nice try, but i suggest you read and take time to comprehend what i am talking about.....