Here we won't go. Hell no. We won't go.
Syria and political hypocrisy
- Thread starter Taichiliberal
- Start date
Here we won't go. Hell no. We won't go.
Where have I heard that one before?
During the primary debates. Everyone except Paul seemed to support interfering in their Civil War. Romney even said we should consider ground troops.
maineman
Banned
people like you who don't understand the difference between arab nationalists and wahabbist islamic extremists should probably confine your discussions to baseball.
maineman
Banned
he struck a target IN a village. yes. Would you prefer we sent delta force or the seals in instead?
So the answer was "yes", all along.
How so?
Taft2016
Verified User
I'm listening...
Explain how the terrorists training in Iraq in 2002 were there to help Saddam against Iran...
....waiting...
maineman
Banned
I never said they were.
It is funny when reading most of the members comments, they just keep looking for excuses and lie to themselves just to justify the wars they get involved into. Iraq is one of the largest oil reserve in the world and according to some sources it is the largest reserve of oil, not talk about the quality of their oil. Saddam refused to sell oil for US money or more correctly US papers as well as many other reasons. It does not need a political genius to understand the main reasons.
In history, to control the world you must control the center of the world and to control the center you must control Palestine, that's why Palestine was the target of all empires by different reasons such as religions, ethnicity, etc that only naive, ignorant or/and deceived people fall to them.
As for the main topic and as always, USA government and their tail UK government among other countries can scream, act humanitarian and heroic (hypocrite) as mush as they want. But reality is they still don't dare get involved in Syria. Unlike Iraq; Syria is in border with Palestine/Israel and any real chaos in Syria will threat Israel existence which in return will threat USA existence in the middle east. Unlike Iraq; Syria has many alliances. If they do attack, then expect and regional or/and world war. And if they don't attack it is still risky for them, that they will with time start losing control over the middle east.
In history, to control the world you must control the center of the world and to control the center you must control Palestine, that's why Palestine was the target of all empires by different reasons such as religions, ethnicity, etc that only naive, ignorant or/and deceived people fall to them.
As for the main topic and as always, USA government and their tail UK government among other countries can scream, act humanitarian and heroic (hypocrite) as mush as they want. But reality is they still don't dare get involved in Syria. Unlike Iraq; Syria is in border with Palestine/Israel and any real chaos in Syria will threat Israel existence which in return will threat USA existence in the middle east. Unlike Iraq; Syria has many alliances. If they do attack, then expect and regional or/and world war. And if they don't attack it is still risky for them, that they will with time start losing control over the middle east.
Taft2016
Verified User
OK, you're dismissed. Your conversations are incoherent.
It's what I call Desharrhea.
When she's cornered she spews it like a skunk and hopes it will distract everyone.
He needs permission to go ashore, doesn't he?
Taft2016
Verified User
As you may or may not recall... there was an embargo on Iraqi oil prior to the invasion.
Afterwards, no country pillaged the oil reserves.
Ten years later, the invasion was still not about oil.
As for Palestine being the center of the world... that fact is about 1000 years out of date.
maineman
Banned
you're the one who can't keep straight who you are talking to. Not me.