I think Syria is about standing on the side of innocent people being killed with banned chemical weapons. Whether the world has the balls to enforce its own international laws is what's at question. I think they will not... even though our president wants them to. There have been plenty of instances in the past where they have failed to do so.
I think everybody that want’s to intervene in Syria’s civil war should grab the next transportation to the area and take whatever means to engage in war with them or donate to whatever cause there they’re comfortable with from afar.
The world community just like all authoritarian collectives is a fucking joke.
If national governments want to get in the middle of Syria’s civil war that’s their prerogative.
There is no imminent danger to America from the Syrian civil war.
There is no binding American national interest involved in Syria’s civil war.
America is 17 trillion $ in debt and has 1.5 trillion $ annual deficits. Involvement in Syria’s civil war would cost America “tens of millions of $” just by the pronouncement of America’s Secretary Of Defense which of course is a monumental under-statement.
A limited American attack on Syria would accomplish/solve what?
What would the unintended consequences be for America from an attack on Syria? The Russians, the Iranians.
What would the “end game” be for an American attack on Syria? What’s the exit strategy?
Where’s the proof of “WHO” actually used chemical weapons in Syria?
Where are the chemical weapons and how do we go about doing something about them?
What God died and left America in charge of the world?
OK! Now I’m open to all of the reasons America should attack Syria.
