The 14th identifies three classes of people.

So who deems them inadmissible or unlawfully present in the U.S.?
The Secretary of State or the Director of Homeland Security.

The far left is big on interpreting the Second Amendment but not the Alien Enemies Act.

It was upheld in 1948, the only time it was challenged.

Three lawyers on FOX, one a Harvard Law professor, said that president Trump would win this one easily on appeal.
 
Last edited:
The Secretary of State or the Director of Homeland Security.

The far left is big on interpreting the Second Amendment but not the Alien Enemies Act.
The Constitution supersedes the Alien Enemies Act. 6th Grade.
 
So did R v. W for decades.
There was never an enumerated Constitutional right to an abortion.

R v. W. was an illegal interpretation of the Constitution and was overturned.

Tens of millions of unborn infants were murdered based on an illegal interpretation of the Constitution.
 
Last edited:
There was never an enumerated Constitutional right to an abortion.

R v. W. was an illegal interpretation of the Constitution and was overturned.

Tens of millions of unborn infants were murdered based on an illegal interpretation of the Constitution.
For decades the Supreme Court said differently.

I believe in individuals right to privacy from government intrusion in the most fundamental issues affecting humanity.
 
For decades the Supreme Court said differently.

I believe in individuals right to privacy from government intrusion in the most fundamental issues affecting humanity.
No, far left loons who tried to destroy Capitalism, shoot presidents, burn Teslas and Tesla dealerships, and oppose the deportation of violent Illegal child rapists and murderers, and oppose cutting waste, fraud and abuse in government do not involve right to privacy.

The right to murder an unborn child does not involve the right to privacy.

It does involve the right of the unborn infants not to be murdered.
 
No, far left loons who tried to destroy Capitalism, shoot presidents, burn Teslas and Tesla dealerships, and oppose the deportation of violent Illegal child rapists and murderers, and oppose cutting waste, fraud and abuse in government do not involve right to privacy.

The right to murder an unborn child does not involve the right to privacy.

It does involve the right of the unborn infants not to be murdered.
Delusion
 
For decades the Supreme Court said differently.

I believe in individuals right to privacy from government intrusion in the most fundamental issues affecting humanity.
...nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
 
Congressman John A. Bingham of Ohio wrote section 1 of the 14th to extend the original intent of the Bill of Rights to the States, often citing the appalling treatment of slaves by States not then burdened by the Bill of Right requirements.

So in essence the Due Process clause, that now applies to the Federal Government as well codifies in the Constitution the then understanding of who had a right to Due Process, which is ALL PEOPLE.

So, when the President says a person is an enemy combatant or in the United States illegally, that person has a right to Due Process, which is a hearing by a Judge to determine if the allegations of the Executive Branch are true, or at least have a rational basis.

The Felon violated this right when he sent people he claimed are here illegally to be tortured in an El Salvadoran prison.

Otherwise one man would be allowed to send anyone to be tortured in El Salvador by simply claiming they fit a catagory. Is that a power Americans want to give the President on his own accord without a check or balance?

I am certain the answer from any rational American would be a resounding NO.
 
Back
Top