The Democrat party: Still EVIL after all these years

But killing a baby "just because I don't want it" is not evil?
I would say aborting a fetus because you realize you are not mature enough to carry it to term is a gray area

but aborting a life because you want another life - be it a specific gender, or race, or hair color - is fucking evil. no if's, and's , or buts
 
I would say aborting a fetus because you realize you are not mature enough to carry it to term is a gray area

but aborting a life because you want another life - be it a specific gender, or race, or hair color - is fucking evil. no if's, and's , or buts
So, how far are you looking to take what is essentially an unenforceable thought crime? You're basically agreeing that abortion/ending what would have been a human life at 7 weeks is legal if you "just don't feel like having a baby", but if you have a specific reason in your mind, then it's evil and should be outlawed. Would you put an age limit on abortion? What about means testing? If you're 30 years old and wealthy, but "just don't want to have a baby" should you be forced to since you're clearly mature enough and able to financially support a baby?
 
So, how far are you looking to take what is essentially an unenforceable thought crime? You're basically agreeing that abortion/ending what would have been a human life at 7 weeks is legal if you "just don't feel like having a baby", but if you have a specific reason in your mind, then it's evil and should be outlawed. Would you put an age limit on abortion? What about means testing? If you're 30 years old and wealthy, but "just don't want to have a baby" should you be forced to since you're clearly mature enough and able to financially support a baby?
it is not unenforceable - and it is more than thoughts -it is actions

you are just being dumb now
 
it is not unenforceable - and it is more than thoughts -it is actions

you are just being dumb now
How are you, an abortion doctor, going to determine the reason someone is getting an abortion? Per you, abortion at 7 weeks is fine... unless you have a specific reason beyond "Meh... I just don't want a kid" and if that reason is xxxxx, then it's evil.

Is it evil if a healthy, wealthy woman in her mid-20's doesn't want to have a baby because she's just starting her career but she knows she can support a baby? Again, how far are you willing to take these thought crimes?
 
How are you, an abortion doctor, going to determine the reason someone is getting an abortion? Per you, abortion at 7 weeks is fine... unless you have a specific reason beyond "Meh... I just don't want a kid" and if that reason is xxxxx, then it's evil.

Is it evil if a healthy, wealthy woman in her mid-20's doesn't want to have a baby because she's just starting her career but she knows she can support a baby? Again, how far are you willing to take these thought crimes?

if someone has a history of getting bloodwork at 7 weeks, and then aborting - I think I can convince a jury of guilt beyond reasonable doubt

the more you focus on how or if we can stop evil - the more I think you are just evil. no harm in making a law saying it is illegal to abort base on gender preference
 
if someone has a history of getting bloodwork at 7 weeks, and then aborting - I think I can convince a jury of guilt beyond reasonable doubt

the more you focus on how or if we can stop evil - the more I think you are just evil. no harm in making a law saying it is illegal to abort base on gender preference
Right, so you want to put people in prison for thought crimes because, as has been mentioned repeatedly, abortion at 7 weeks is perfectly legal... unless the wrong nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc happen to be bouncing around in your head.
 
Right, so you want to put people in prison for thought crimes because, as has been mentioned repeatedly, abortion at 7 weeks is perfectly legal... unless the wrong nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc happen to be bouncing around in your head.
you really are an idiot - thought crimes are crimes based on what you think, not actions you take

aborting a baby because you want a boy- and foolishly confiding in someone - explain how this is a thought crime
or admit you are fucking dumb
 
you really are an idiot - thought crimes are crimes based on what you think, not actions you take

aborting a baby because you want a boy- and foolishly confiding in someone - explain how this is a thought crime
or admit you are fucking dumb
Because LITERALLY the only difference between every legal abortion at 7 weeks, and the one you want to prosecute, is based on the reason. Reasons exist only as the result of nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc in your head in the form of thoughts.

Hence - thought crimes.
 
Because LITERALLY the only difference between every legal abortion at 7 weeks, and the one you want to prosecute, is based on the reason. Reasons exist only as the result of nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc in your head in the form of thoughts.

Hence - thought crimes.
so racial discrimination is just a thought crime and you are opposed to any laws trying to prevent it?

that is your position here?
 
so racial discrimination is just a thought crime and you are opposed to any laws trying to prevent it?

that is your position here?
Racial Discriminating is, in itself, what's illegal. What you're saying is that racial discrimination (aka abortion) is legal, unless you're thinking about Chinese people (aka gender), then it's illegal and you should go to prison.
 
Last edited:
Racial Discriminating is, in itself, what's illegal. What you're saying is that racial discrimination (aka abortion) is legal, unless you're thinking about Chinese people (aka gender), then it's illegal and you should go to prison.
yes discrimination based on a protected class is illegal - but how do you prove the thought crime? that is your weak argument here
 
yes discrimination based on a protected class is illegal - but how do you prove the thought crime? that is your weak argument here
I'm trying to keep the comparison aligned. So, I'm am saying discrimination IS LEGAL.

Imagine that discriminating was legal. Imagine that a business owner was justified in hiring only white people or only black people. Now imagine that someone wanted to pass a law saying that, while discrimination was legal, it would be illegal if you were thinking about discriminating against Chinese people.
 
I'm trying to keep the comparison aligned. So, I'm am saying discrimination IS LEGAL.

Imagine that discriminating was legal. Imagine that a business owner was justified in hiring only white people or only black people. Now imagine that someone wanted to pass a law saying that, while discrimination was legal, it would be illegal if you were thinking about discriminating against Chinese people.
imagine if you had a brain and could actually communicate with other adults
 
Not in the modern party (and no one has EVER supported abortion after birth). But you go girl.
Incorrect. Either you are egregiously out of touch or you are deliberately spreading disinformation.

Ralph Northam was the DNC's point man for advocating for abortion after birth, as a matter between a woman and her doctor, whereby the newborn is set aside and "made comfortable" while the mother and her doctor "discuss" the matter without any rush or pressure, and decide on the course of action "that is best for the mother."

The modern Republican party IS extreme.
The modern Republican subsidiary of the Uniparty is now almost a complete clone of its DNC owner.

You are about to elect a felon.
This is disingenuous. The DNC rigged a court process to destroy its most HATED enemy. The fact that you would "go there" shows that you obviously have no intention of being honest on this matter.

You supported the violent overthrow of the Government on Jan 6.
Yup, I was correct. You are not to exhibit any honesty on this matter.

Unlike the Right who consistently vote against expanded help for the poor, lower cost healthcare for the poor, etc.
Conservatives give many times more to the poor and disadvantaged than leftists who are the GREEDIEST mother-fuckers on the planet. Conservatives know that charity, the rightful place for such assistance, cannot be legislated. Leftists, however, in their eternal quest for total dishonesty, press for suffocating taxation to steal wealth from those who add value to society and pretend to redistribute some crumbs to the poor in the name of the leftist societal cancer.

This is how leftists intend to bring back slavery, i.e. by forcing ever greater numbers into poverty, and by forcing ever greater numbers of the growing impoverished into total dependence on the government's legitimized redistribution of other people's money.

The DNC never accepted losing slavery; they depend on it. The DNC is resolved to bring it back.

You guys only care about the Second.
Conservatives care about the entire package. I realize that you have a particular HATRED for the Republican party because it was founded on the principle of ending slavery, and we all know that leftists have never stopped fighting tooth and nail to reestablish slavery. Republicans represent a direct afront to the leftists' hopes and dreams.

Conservatives fight for the integrity of the entire Constitution and defend it against all enemies, foreign and domestic, particularly against its domestic leftist enemies.

Bet you grab you some Medicare the SECOND you qualify.
It is completely disingenuous to make Medicare the only viable option and then attack people for doing the only thing they can do.

We need to open all medical care to the completely free market, and get government out of it completely.

How about enjoying those "public highways"?
You don't get to claim limited resources are somehow on your side.

LOL. You lot have no clue how this country operates and you have no clue what "freedom" means.
Let me know when you want to bring it on. I'll pick you apart in short order. I'm standing by.

Is that why there has been no Republican to win the popular vote for POTUS in decades?
Trump won the popular vote by an avalanche in the stolen election, which is why the DNC had to steal it.
 
The Dem-Dumb party has been pro slavery, pro eugenics, pro-segregation (and now desegregation), and pro-abortion--
even after a baby has been born alive.

And yet those in that party always call Republicans "extreme."

Stupefying.

Dem-Dumbs disdain life, and they increasingly despise the First, Second, and various other Amendments in the Bill of Rights.
So they clearly detest liberty as well.

Dem-Dumbs have been anti-Freedom since the beginning, except, to be fair, for the "freedoms" to enjoy pornography and
drugs, be employed while having others pay for your indolence.

Polling clearly shows that American citizens don't agree with Democrats' policies on most every issue, whether from crime to
border control, or from the economy to transgender "affirming care" for minors.

Leaders of the Dem-Dumb party are most of those residing in the swamp and the staggeringly vast deep state, are not good
people, they are EVIL!
GO FUCK YOURSELF!
 
NO!

My response is the only proper response to your moronic posts!
Its not moronic as everything posted in the OP besides the part where he'll keep men out of women's sports (which he'll certainly do come 2025), he'll do again to help make America Great Again. Proper response from you? LOL! You cannot deny all those things from the OP actually took place between 2017 and 2020.
 
Its not moronic as everything posted in the OP besides the part where he'll keep men out of women's sports (which he'll certainly do come 2025), he'll do again to help make America Great Again. Proper response from you? LOL! You cannot deny all those things from the OP actually took place between 2017 and 2020.
Lies! Lies! AND MORE LIES!

Fuck off LIAR!

I have "0" respect for liars!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top