The Jew Hating white lib LEFT ban Pro Israel speakers at Berkeley - Jew free zones

martin said:
I gave a precise definition: "Critical race theory (CRT) is a cross-disciplinary examination, by social and civil-rights scholars and activists, to explore how laws, social and political movements, and media shape, and are shaped by, social conceptions of race and ethnicity."

If that is too many words to take in try: CRT is the study and theory of how perceptions of race shape our society.

For every CRT theorist and defender of CRT there are a few hundred or so handwringing Right wingers.
Click to expand...

The right did a bit more than hand wringing in Virginia. They flipped that state from blue to red.

CRT is racist and separates six year olds by "oppressor" and' oppressed."

Poor Marty.
 
martin said:
Don't know what to do with this. Obviously CRT is based on race. As history is based on the past. Your argument boils down to attacking CRT as racist because it attempts to explain racism. This leaves us nowhere; more exactly it leaves you nowhere.

When Harris used the word "equity" she meant what equity means, i.e., fairness, in this case people most impacted and least able to help themselves in the disaster, those without financial and other resources of their own to deal with it. As a practical matter this means disproportionally people of color.
Click to expand...

no she meant blacks only, wisen up and listen.

you voted for racists.
 
Earl said:
The right did a bit more than hand wringing in Virginia. They flipped that state from blue to red.

CRT is racist and separates six year olds by "oppressor" and' oppressed."

Poor Marty.
Click to expand...

I live in Virginia, which is and has been "purple", not blue, and before that was red. We still have a Democratic Senate.

You don't know much, dummy, and CRT seems part of that vacancy.
 
martin said:
I live in Virginia, which is and has been "purple", not blue, and before that was red. We still have a Democratic Senate.

You don't know much, dummy, and CRT seems part of that vacancy.
Click to expand...

So, you admit that CRT is racist, Marty.

Republicans swept the three statewide races in Virginia including the governorship. They also won a majority in the commonwealth’s House of Delegates.

Those were blue before the elections, Marty.

Lose the playground insults, Marty. You aren’t very good at them...or much else.
 
martin said:
I live in Virginia, which is and has been "purple", not blue, and before that was red. We still have a Democratic Senate.

You don't know much, dummy, and CRT seems part of that vacancy.
Click to expand...



You're such a pompous pillock, Marty. Why don't you listen to the inestimable John McWhorter instead of spouting bullshit?

John McWhorter, a black linguistics professor at Columbia University, says that parents who truly believe themselves to be anti-racist need to yank their kids out of schools that implement critical race theory into their curriculums.

McWhorter targeted Dwight-Englewood School in Englewood, New Jersey, in particular after former English teacher Dana Stangel-Plowe announced her decision to resign from her position at the school following allegations that it was indoctrinating children through CRT teachings.

McWhorter, in addition to being a noted academic, is an author and journalist who has written for CNN, Forbes, National Geographic, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and Time, among other prolific outlets.

On Tuesday, McWhorter tweeted a link of Stangel-Plowe’s remarks on her resignation and captioned it, “All hail Dana Stangel-Plowe, who has resigned from the Dwight-Englewood school, which teaches students ‘antiracism’ that sees life as nothing but abuse of power, and teaches that cringing, hostile group identity against oppression is the essence of a self. Truly antiracist parents, in the name of love of their kids, should pull them from the Dwight-Englewood school as of next fall. Only thing will arrest these misguided Elect parishioners from their quest to forge a new reality for us all.

https://conservativefighters.co/new...-must-pull-kids-from-school-that-teaches-crt/
 
Last edited:
This great Constitutional Republic is showing signs of a return to sanity.

Racist, radical Democrat Socialists are being rejected along with their racist CRT and BLM and teaching perversion and “oppressed” and “oppressors” to six year olds.

Their “de-fund” the police backfired and they are scrambling to say that they never really, really, really supported it...but in fact, they did.

Biden’s out of control inflation, borders and crime are demonstrating what happens to America when the far left Democrats are in control.

America is learning a painful lesson, never, never, never vote for these far left Democrat Socialist loons.
 
Primavera said:

You're such a pompous pillock, Marty. Why don't you listen to the inestimable John McWhorter instead of spouting bullshit?

John McWhorter, a black linguistics professor at Columbia University, says that parents who truly believe themselves to be anti-racist need to yank their kids out of schools that implement critical race theory into their curriculums.

McWhorter targeted Dwight-Englewood School in Englewood, New Jersey, in particular after former English teacher Dana Stangel-Plowe announced her decision to resign from her position at the school following allegations that it was indoctrinating children through CRT teachings.

McWhorter, in addition to being a noted academic, is an author and journalist who has written for CNN, Forbes, National Geographic, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and Time, among other prolific outlets.

On Tuesday, McWhorter tweeted a link of Stangel-Plowe’s remarks on her resignation and captioned it, “All hail Dana Stangel-Plowe, who has resigned from the Dwight-Englewood school, which teaches students ‘antiracism’ that sees life as nothing but abuse of power, and teaches that cringing, hostile group identity against oppression is the essence of a self. Truly antiracist parents, in the name of love of their kids, should pull them from the Dwight-Englewood school as of next fall. Only thing will arrest these misguided Elect parishioners from their quest to forge a new reality for us all.

https://conservativefighters.co/new...-must-pull-kids-from-school-that-teaches-crt/
Click to expand...

I didn't realize John McWhorter is "inestimable". Had never heard of him either. Had you?

I would be as much against CRT as he is if CRT were as he describes. His description is a rant, however. CRT is a method of understanding the effects of racist attitudes on our civil life. The argument, if any, should be with the results from these attempts, not good faith attempts themselves (which the Englewood example your post cites may not have been) or with the idea of CRT that is behind them. It's telling when self identified conservatives rage against CRT while appearing to have no interest in what CRT is.
 
CRT is racist and those who support it are racists.

Separating white six year olds as “oppressors” and black six year olds as “oppressed” is obscene and divisive and racist.
 
Israel, the world’s only Jewish-majority country, is a subject of special concern to many Jews in the United States. Caring about Israel is “essential” to what being Jewish means to 45% of U.S. Jewish adults, and an additional 37% say it is “important, but not essential,” according to a new Pew Research Center survey that was fielded from Nov. 19, 2019, to June 3, 2020 – well before the latest surge of violence in the region. Just 16% of U.S. Jewish adults say that caring about Israel is “not important” to their Jewish identity.

Most Jewish Americans identify as Democrats or lean toward the Democratic Party, and more than half gave negative ratings at the time of the survey both to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and to then-President Donald Trump’s handling of U.S. policy toward Israel.
 
martin said:
I didn't realize John McWhorter is "inestimable". Had never heard of him either. Had you?

I would be as much against CRT as he is if CRT were as he describes. His description is a rant, however. CRT is a method of understanding the effects of racist attitudes on our civil life. The argument, if any, should be with the results from these attempts, not good faith attempts themselves (which the Englewood example your post cites may not have been) or with the idea of CRT that is behind them. It's telling when self identified conservatives rage against CRT while appearing to have no interest in what CRT is.
Click to expand...

Yes of course I've heard of him and indeed posted about him several times before now. That you've never heard of him is par for the course sadly. At least you resisted the temptation to called him an Oreo. Bet you rushed out and bought a copy of White Fragility though, amirite?

Columbia University professor and linguist John McWhorter, who is Black, echoes that criticism, writing in The Atlantic that the book "openly infantilized Black people" and "simply dehumanized us."

He argues that for "DiAngelo, the whole point is the suffering" of white people, who are "taught that pretty much anything they say or think is racist and thus antithetical to the good."

McWhorter spoke with Morning Edition's Steve Inskeep about his criticism of the book and what he thinks is needed to change racist institutions.

https://www.npr.org/2020/07/20/8929...ite-fragility-as-dehumanizing-to-black-people
 
Last edited:
martin said:
I didn't realize John McWhorter is "inestimable". Had never heard of him either. Had you?

I would be as much against CRT as he is if CRT were as he describes. His description is a rant, however. CRT is a method of understanding the effects of racist attitudes on our civil life. The argument, if any, should be with the results from these attempts, not good faith attempts themselves (which the Englewood example your post cites may not have been) or with the idea of CRT that is behind them. It's telling when self identified conservatives rage against CRT while appearing to have no interest in what CRT is.
Click to expand...

Which "racist attitudes" are you talking about? Are we at a place where all we have to attack are racist attitudes? I don't give a shit what your attitude is toward me until it impacts your behavior in relation to me. Those two things are the same at all but you people really want to change attitudes not behavior. Thought control huh Adolf?
 
Primavera said:
Yes of course I've heard of him and indeed posted about him several times before now. That you've never heard of him is par for the course sadly. At least you resisted the temptation to called him an Oreo. Bet you rushed out and bought a copy of White Fragility though, amirite?

Columbia University professor and linguist John McWhorter, who is Black, echoes that criticism, writing in The Atlantic that the book "openly infantilized Black people" and "simply dehumanized us."

He argues that for "DiAngelo, the whole point is the suffering" of white people, who are "taught that pretty much anything they say or think is racist and thus antithetical to the good."

McWhorter spoke with Morning Edition's Steve Inskeep about his criticism of the book and what he thinks is needed to change racist institutions.

https://www.npr.org/2020/07/20/8929...ite-fragility-as-dehumanizing-to-black-people
Click to expand...

He is quite a prolific writer.

https://www.thriftbooks.com/a/john-h-mcwhorter/3571679/

Marty doesn’t get out much.
 
Primavera said:
Yep, Marty is not very smarty!!
Click to expand...

That’s very perceptive of you, Primavera.

All hat and no saddle comes to mind.

Marty tries but he is morbidly misguided, politically.

And (sic) not very smarty.

I am reminded of my debate days at the Harvard of the South. My motivation for being on the debate team... my girlfriend said she would be extra nice to me if I joined her.

I see Marty being escorted off the debate stage amid peals of derisive laughter.

Poor old Marty.
 
Primavera said:
Yes of course I've heard of him and indeed posted about him several times before now. That you've never heard of him is par for the course sadly. At least you resisted the temptation to called him an Oreo. Bet you rushed out and bought a copy of White Fragility though, amirite?

Columbia University professor and linguist John McWhorter, who is Black, echoes that criticism, writing in The Atlantic that the book "openly infantilized Black people" and "simply dehumanized us."

He argues that for "DiAngelo, the whole point is the suffering" of white people, who are "taught that pretty much anything they say or think is racist and thus antithetical to the good."

McWhorter spoke with Morning Edition's Steve Inskeep about his criticism of the book and what he thinks is needed to change racist institutions.

https://www.npr.org/2020/07/20/8929...ite-fragility-as-dehumanizing-to-black-people
Click to expand...

Well, DiAngelo is as nutty as he is. It seems CRT can only be discussed in terms of extremes when it is not extreme to recognize that racism has impacted our civil life and still does and to inquire into
those impacts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top