The Left and One Party Rule

Bollocks, you hate America, you wish to see America bankrupted by welfare!!
It's called envy !
Now go back to your pathetic meaningless life of mediocrity !
Let Americans thrive!!

As usual your comments are illogical. If America is the richest country why do you think social programs would bankrupt it when most other industrialized nations can afford them? The answer, of course, is we all know it has nothing to to with affordability.

When people talk about American Exceptionalism I don't think they're referring to the idea it's the only industrialized country claiming it can't afford social policies although that, in itself, is exceptional.
 
But you're someone who wants a society based on Star Trek, so your entire diatribe is dismissed.

What do you have against Captain Kirk? Or is your entity-ism directed towards Mr. Spock? Are you a Vulcanist? Or is your envy regarding not being able to be with an Orion gal? "Orion females were very animalistic in nature, known for their extreme carnal appetites and their innate skill of seduction. A Human male could rarely resist the alluring dance of the Orion slave girl."

Or is it simply a matter of your inability to comprehend logic?

Re: Orion salve girls one has to remember, "In Orion society, the males were slaves to the females. As a means of deceiving other species, the Orions maintained the facade that the females were the slaves. This was commonly done by selling Orion females on the Orion slave market.

Once sold to a male, the Orion slave girls used their unique physiology to their advantage; their highly potent pheromones accelerated the metabolisms of males of many species, raising adrenaline production to dangerous levels which caused aggression and, ultimately, a form of delusion. Its most significant effect was to make them susceptible to suggestion. Not long after, the "owner" males began taking orders from their "slave" females. The pheromones' effects were cumulative; the longer exposed, the more pronounced the results."
http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Orion

The pheromones, the scent of the woman, accelerated the metabolism of males resulting in the woman controlling the male. When one thinks about it, it's not that much different here on earth. :D
 
What do you have against Captain Kirk? Or is your entity-ism directed towards Mr. Spock? Are you a Vulcanist? Or is your envy regarding not being able to be with an Orion gal? "Orion females were very animalistic in nature, known for their extreme carnal appetites and their innate skill of seduction. A Human male could rarely resist the alluring dance of the Orion slave girl."

Or is it simply a matter of your inability to comprehend logic?

Re: Orion salve girls one has to remember, "In Orion society, the males were slaves to the females. As a means of deceiving other species, the Orions maintained the facade that the females were the slaves. This was commonly done by selling Orion females on the Orion slave market.

Once sold to a male, the Orion slave girls used their unique physiology to their advantage; their highly potent pheromones accelerated the metabolisms of males of many species, raising adrenaline production to dangerous levels which caused aggression and, ultimately, a form of delusion. Its most significant effect was to make them susceptible to suggestion. Not long after, the "owner" males began taking orders from their "slave" females. The pheromones' effects were cumulative; the longer exposed, the more pronounced the results."
http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Orion

The pheromones, the scent of the woman, accelerated the metabolism of males resulting in the woman controlling the male. When one thinks about it, it's not that much different here on earth. :D

You do realize that the shows WERE NOT documentaries and were make believe, kind of like most of your thinking.
 
As usual your comments are illogical. If America is the richest country why do you think social programs would bankrupt it when most other industrialized nations can afford them? The answer, of course, is we all know it has nothing to to with affordability.

When people talk about American Exceptionalism I don't think they're referring to the idea it's the only industrialized country claiming it can't afford social policies although that, in itself, is exceptional.
All lesser countries have massive social programmes, stagnant economies and socialised healthcare with waiting lists.

USA too has massive social programmes, but a great and resilient economy that foriegners wish to destroy out of envy.
Obama believes it is more important to be loved by foriegners than to do what is right for America.
He is an appeaser.
 
You do realize that the shows WERE NOT documentaries and were make believe, kind of like most of your thinking.

Yes, they were make believe just like all the great ideas were at one time. Like the crazy idea people could build a machine and fly. Or turn on a box in their living room and see pictures that are transmitted throuh the air. Talk about craziness!! Or a little pill that could clear up an "irritation" from a wild Saturday night. (I had to get that in there.)

Society is progressing and we have to go along. We all should want to go along. Let's work towards a better world.
 
All lesser countries have massive social programmes, stagnant economies and socialised healthcare with waiting lists.

Not true. Canada has a better economy than the US right now and Canada has plenty of social programs. As for healthcare waiting lists the majority of citizens in every country with "socialized medicine" prefer that to a "pay or suffer" system. It's like regular highways and toll roads. While some people are happy to pay a toll the vast majority use the regular highway.

USA too has massive social programmes, but a great and resilient economy that foriegners wish to destroy out of envy.
Obama believes it is more important to be loved by foriegners than to do what is right for America.
He is an appeaser.

That sounds like paranoia. Citizens wanting health care are not trying to destroy the country.
 
Not true. Canada has a better economy than the US right now and Canada has plenty of social programs. As for healthcare waiting lists the majority of citizens in every country with "socialized medicine" prefer that to a "pay or suffer" system. It's like regular highways and toll roads. While some people are happy to pay a toll the vast majority use the regular highway.

Of course Canada thanks God for the toll roads that connect her to America where her citizens can travel to get health care that might kill them in Canada while they wait for it, huh?
 
Yes, they were make believe just like all the great ideas were at one time. Like the crazy idea people could build a machine and fly. Or turn on a box in their living room and see pictures that are transmitted throuh the air. Talk about craziness!! Or a little pill that could clear up an "irritation" from a wild Saturday night. (I had to get that in there.)

Society is progressing and we have to go along. We all should want to go along. Let's work towards a better world.

Then your socialized wishes will be reconsidered, once we have replication machines in abundance.
 
Of course Canada thanks God for the toll roads that connect her to America where her citizens can travel to get health care that might kill them in Canada while they wait for it, huh?

It never ceases to amaze me the the ignorance surrounding government health care. Check out what's called "longevity" and get back to me. OK?
 
Not true. Canada has a better economy than the US right now and Canada has plenty of social programs. As for healthcare waiting lists the majority of citizens in every country with "socialized medicine" prefer that to a "pay or suffer" system. It's like regular highways and toll roads. While some people are happy to pay a toll the vast majority use the regular highway.



That sounds like paranoia. Citizens wanting health care are not trying to destroy the country.
When politicians run healthcare it becomes politicized and then is used for vote purchasing.
Just look at the UK NHS.
Prioritised care was given to those who had managed to achieve the lucrative label of VULNERABLE.

That was the magic word!

Vulnerable but to what?
The vulnerable were early released criminals, convicted sex offenders, career welfare recipients, drug addicts, convicts and suspects under arrest, they were the vulnerable.
Front of the line.
Paying customers last!!
 
It never ceases to amaze me the the ignorance surrounding government health care. Check out what's called "longevity" and get back to me. OK?

OK! Check out what’s called “bankruptcy” and get back to me OK?

Seems the financial “longevity” of nations that apply socialized medicine is in question.
 
Folks, I have a couple of questions I would like to throw at you.

1) Do Liberals really think that by eliminating the Conservative voice in America, that everything would be fine?

2) Where would Conservatives fit in modern America?

I qualify that last question as I think that to be a Conservative, you cannot adopt the so-called "fiscally conservative, socially liberal" copout.
Then you're not really a conservative then. You're a political reactionary. That's the problem with most of you on the far right. You keep demonizing those who don't agree with you as "a liberal" then attempt to co-opt the phrase "conservative" when people like you aren't even remotely conservative.

A conservative is a person who has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Ya'll want to change the nation into some right wing never, never fantasy land. To say that a person cannot have a vested interest, economically, in the status quo and be progressive socially, is by defintion a reactionary thing to say.
 
Fear mongering from the right, sounds like unchanged strategy and a third straight blowout.
The problem is, they haven't figured out the magnitude of the blow out becuase of the gerrymandered geographic advantages the GOP has engineered. That can't go on for ever. If during the next census in 2020 there is a Democrat as President and a majority of Governors that are Democrat than they will lose the house for the foreseable future too. The GOP's grasp on the house despite losing the popular vote to Democrats in congressional elections sure does illustrate the significance of geography in our elections.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top