I think most people would disagree with that definition of racism.
Thank you. I am always happy to disagree with any mistaken mass of morons. I didn't create the English language. I simply learned it properly.
The KKK are generally seen as being racist
Nope. They are often mistakenly referred to as "racist" when they would be correctly identified as "bigots." The KKK has no power; it is absurd to argue that the KKK can keep blacks out of professional sports, prevent them from holding positions in government, ensure no black man ever gets elected to Congress or to the Presidency, prevent blacks from living in any city, village or community, prevent blacks from attending any college or institution or even to prevent blacks from controlling entire major cities. The KKK are powerless to be racist. They absolutely can, and are, bigots.
But sure, if we're going by that definition, then Trump is pretending to be a bigot, not a racist.
You have TDS. Surely you must be aware that everyone who reads your posts filters out all content like this line above as if you never wrote it. Surely you must realize that when you express your TDS, readers of your posts interpret them not as saying anything about Trump but as you speaking volumes about yourself.
Jussayn.
Also, at some point in the past you made a poor decision to afix a cheezy virtue-signalling image in your signature. Anyone perusing any thread in which you participate instantly recognizes you as someone who (desperately) depends on emotional appeals for acceptance as opposed to strong arguments. You probably don't realize that the projection of your super-hero fantasy reveals your true self-image of weakness and impotence. I think most people find that rather pathetic, even if they see themselves as weak and impotent as well.
Jussayn.
The judge hasn't made a point to expresse pride in his Mexican heritage.
So we finally arrive at the root of your error. Yes the judge has expressed pride in his family and heritage. Now, if you can set your TDS aside for a moment you can reprocess this item with the new information and arrive at the correct understanding.
Trump assumed (or at least pretended to assume) that the judge is more loyal to Mexico than America,
Nope. Fortunately we discovered this second error of yours. Trump was not claiming the judge was loyal to Mexico. He was claiming that the judge was unfair to him, and pressed to get him recused for an impartial judge that would not be unfair.
You're not going to find any member of the Bar who will agree with you that Trump should have just quietly accepted an unfair judge and somehow avoided arguing from every angle to get the judge recused. You are simply in error.
The Four Year Plan gave Göring the power to create laws relating to industry anytime he wanted.
Yes. Goering was the plenipotenciary. He had full reign.
If he wanted, he could have enforced collective ownership, thus turning Germany into a Socialist country, but he never did.
Nope. Transitioning specifically to a commonwealth is not required for socialism. The naming of Goering as the chief central planner is what was required and transitioned Germany into an idealized socialist state.
Central planning is where you should be focusing, not in becoming a commonwealth like Virginia.
That's beside the point. The point is North Korea is not democratic,
North Korea absolutely is Marxist. Where did you get the idea it wasn't. Check the central planning.
